(3.5 stars) For readers who've followed Lauren Winner's career, Wearing God feels like the natural next step from her 2012 work Still. In the author q&a at the end of that book, Winner notes that "Among other things, divorcing has shaken up the assumptions I bring to reading scripture. In leaving my marriage, I was doing something that was simply not permissible, not in the way I have always interpreted scripture, and that is something I remain troubled by, confused by--it is not something about which I feel cavalier. I don't know, as neatly as I once knew, what my hermeneutic of scripture is. What does it mean to be someone who affirms scripture's authority, someone who wants to live inside the scriptural story, but who has made a major life choice that contradicts something about which Jesus in the Gospels is pretty clear? I don't have a straightforward, stable answer to that. I expect I will be trying to work it out for a long time." Wearing God feels like a lovely result of that working out.
In this book, Winner examines some of the less familiar descriptions of and metaphors for God in the Bible. Of particular note are the chapters on God as clothing, God's laughter, God as laboring woman. For any readers who worried, like I did, that part of Winner's working out of her hermeneutic would involve a lower or more cavalier view of scriptural authority, it quickly becomes evident that this did not happen and that Winner's approach remains thoughtful, creative, and rigorous. The two notes that bookend the text -- a short note on attempting to avoid gendering pronouns of God throughout and a short note on not including a chapter on the troubling metaphors of God as domestic abuser based on her work in a women's prison -- are particularly fine. In both, Winner balances between acknowledging troubling aspects of tradition/Scripture and not getting overly caught up in them, nor attempting to bend them or scriptural authority to her own preference. Throughout, there is a high view of the story that Winner finds herself in, even when it's complex and baffling. Maybe particularly when it's complex and baffling. I particularly appreciated the encouragement for the reader to link metaphors directly to their own lives (Winner argues that we're meant to do this, hence the many images of God as shepherd, God as king, etc, in the texts for an ANE audience who would've had such figures in their everyday lives) and the final chapter on Deus absconditas, how the hiddenness of God often is made manifest through language.
I did knock off a star for how the book overpromises -- in the introduction Winner talks about the richness of unexpected metaphors like God as beekeeper, tree, dog, metaphors which are ultimately left out of the text at hand. While Winner brings great insights to God as bread and wine and God as fire, neither of these images are unfamiliar to modern churchgoers (and maybe are as used and overused as God as shepherd/father/king). I would have loved to see more on the other, more radical metaphors in place of these two chapters. And while I appreciated the inclusion of lengthy quotations from various sources, I thought the book would have been better served by placing them all at the end of the chapters they were attached to, or as an appendix, rather than interspersed with the main text throughout. It made for a somewhat disjointed reading experience, personally.
The other way that I see Wearing God as being the natural next step of Winner's writings is how little she talks about the events/people of her own life. Unlike Girl Meets God, Still, and to some extent Real Sex, Wearing God really isn't in any way a spiritual memoir, even though Winner delves pretty deeply into her own feelings about the various metaphors. I couldn't tell if this was a kind of gun-shyness in the aftermath of the negative reactions to Still or if Winner felt like she had overshared in the past... or if it's the kind of humility that C.S. Lewis writes about -- not thinking less of oneself, but rather simply thinking of oneself less. At any rate, no one could accuse Winner of oversharing in this book (her new husband and congregation are mentioned rarely and typically only in passing), which may frustrate longtime readers of Winner's who are more used to the tone of her earlier books. To me, the restraint felt respectful and appropriate to the subject matter, though I would find it a shame if it came about mostly through Winner being burned so badly as a public figure in evangelical circles.
In all -- there are some real gems in this book, and it's made me want to be more on the lookout for unexpected metaphors as I read scripture.