General Books publication date: 2009 Original publication date: 1872 Original Publisher: James R. Osgood Subjects: Fiction / Classics Fiction / Literary Literary Criticism / American / General Notes: This is an OCR reprint of the original rare book. There may be typos or missing text and there are no illustrations. When you buy the General Books edition of this book you get free trial access to Million-Books.com where you can select from more than a million books for free. You can also preview the book there.
Nathaniel Hawthorne was a 19th century American novelist and short story writer. He is seen as a key figure in the development of American literature for his tales of the nation's colonial history.
Shortly after graduating from Bowdoin College, Hathorne changed his name to Hawthorne. Hawthorne anonymously published his first work, a novel titled Fanshawe, in 1828. In 1837, he published Twice-Told Tales and became engaged to painter and illustrator Sophia Peabody the next year. He worked at a Custom House and joined a Transcendentalist Utopian community, before marrying Peabody in 1842. The couple moved to The Old Manse in Concord, Massachusetts, later moving to Salem, the Berkshires, then to The Wayside in Concord. The Scarlet Letter was published in 1850, followed by a succession of other novels. A political appointment took Hawthorne and family to Europe before returning to The Wayside in 1860. Hawthorne died on May 19, 1864, leaving behind his wife and their three children.
Much of Hawthorne's writing centers around New England and many feature moral allegories with a Puritan inspiration. His work is considered part of the Romantic movement and includes novels, short stories, and a biography of his friend, the United States President Franklin Pierce.
Read this as part of a Literature course. Learning literary criticism with this book made it all the more fascinating to read. Having read it in high school, a lot of it went over my head and I remember disliking the book as the ending is bleak. Yet, it was a totally new experience looking at it thematically and with critical theory/ formalism. Hawthorne was intentional with his word choice and foregrounding. This book is more endearing to me in adulthood.
The Scarlett Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne is a classic American novel that was written decades ago. It is long, excessively wordy, and ultimately, quite boring; at least, that was my opinion of it once I finally finished the last page. While I can respect Nathaniel Hawthorne as a writer, I do not like his work. Those opinions aside, the book’s themes largely revolve around sin, evil, human nature, and the like. The book seems to be written in a preachy sort of way. Its writing is very descriptive, using very long analogies and metaphors to describe the simplest of things. Had this book been written in a more simplistic style, it would have been far shorter. The title of the book makes reference to the famous red letter “A” that the main character, Hester Prynne, must wear as a symbol of her adulterous ways. This letter represents the books predominant theme of sin. The people of the book make her wear this to let everyone else know that she screwed up, and the price is apparently humiliation and shame. It is very unforgiving and harsh. This theme of sin is very closely tied to evil, the root of all sins. Because of the fact that human nature is to sin, engage in sinful activities, think sinfully, and so on, that is closely tied to sin as well. There is some degree of acceptance in this book, but it felt very overshadowed by the more negative aspects of the story. Hawthorne’s style was incredibly detail oriented and descriptive. Now, in moderation, this is actually a good thing. I applaud authors that let me know exactly what I am looking at and can paint a vivid picture of that in my head. Mr. Hawthorne takes this to the next level, almost numbing the reader’s mind to the events of the story with his long-winded and meticulous descriptions of the environment and the people. All things in moderation, and in this case, less is more. All in all, this book was pretty dry for me. I still recognize its particular finesse and rightful place in American literary history, but it was not for me. I would recommend it for a fan of classic literature, or for patient readers.
I have just three things to say about this 'classic.' 1.Boring 2.Extremly confusing and hard to read. 3.Filled with as many world-view problems as The Matrix.
You know, in college Nathaniel Hawthorne was one of my favorite authors. I especially enjoyed reading some of his short stories. The Scarlet Letter is one that I read in high school. I really couldn't remember it when I picked it up again for Nathanuary.
So did I like it? Not so much. I gave it three stars; because, it's a well-written classic. I nearly gave up an The Scarlet Letter because the Counting House bored me terribly. When I read the actual story, it kept my attention; but, it was just so tragic. I was so sad for the way the town's people treated Hester, how her OOPS! just about gave it away. Anyhow, it was a sad story with some very good character development.
Okay,.... 3rd reading over the course of 35ish years. STILL confused on what to say on how I feel about this book. I thought maturity with age would help with some insight but I am still left with more blanks, more questions, and many of the same questions & thoughts I faced the first 2 times I read it.
Yes, great foreshadowing, great symbolism, strong character, yada, yada, yada. I loved the style of writing though many have problems understanding it but it fits the time period and I loved her strength, spunk, and conviction to be true to herself.
The two areas that continue to bother me to this day are:
1). It rambles on and on and on often with nothing to do with anything related to do about the story line itself. (Is this an attempt to make the book longer or did the author go off on a side tangent?) 2) Without trying to spoil anything,.... Why was "he" made out to be such a sniveling cowardly whimp? Why did she cover for so long & simply accept the ridicule and being ostracized for both her and her daughter?
I'm not sure O will ever truly understand the true intentions of what the author desired for the readers to attain from reading the book.
Hardest book I've ever read, but I was determined to finish. I can't say I didn't skim a lot of words, but I understood the plot. Sad book but it was good. I'd give it 2.5 stars if that was an option. If you don't know the word ignominy, look it up first. It's on every other page, along with a lot of words we don't use a lot today.
My copy has 268 and I finished the book. It was tough to read this initially, but I started to like it more as it went on. I like how the characters developed and the ending. I think Pearl is a really interesting character and it would be fun to create her. I like how the minister tells everyone at the end that he's sorry, and he should've stood with Hester 7 years ago. Overall, It was ok. I struggled to understand what was happening at first but it got easier.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
This first chapter contains little in the way of action, instead setting the scene and introducing the first of many symbols that will come to dominate the story. A crowd of somber, dreary-looking people has gathered outside the door of a prison in seventeenth-century Boston
The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne is a classic American novel renowned for its intricate language and profound themes. It follows the story of Hester Prynne, a young woman who is ostracized by her Puritan community after giving birth to a child out of wedlock. As a punishment, she is forced to wear a scarlet "A" on her chest, a public symbol of her adultery. Despite the harsh judgment she faces, Hester refuses to reveal the identity of her lover, who is later revealed to be the town's respected minister, Arthur Dimmesdale. Their shared secret becomes a source of torment for both of them, as they struggle to reconcile their guilt with their desire for redemption. The novel delves into the complexities of sin, repentance, and societal hypocrisy. It explores the themes of love, forgiveness, and the enduring human spirit. Through Hester's experiences, Hawthorne offers a powerful commentary on the destructive nature of prejudice and the importance of compassion.
The Scarlett Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne opens with a discovery of a script in a posthouse. The book revolves around the letter A worn by Hester Prynne marking her for her sins of adultery. Because her daughter Pearl was born to a man in which she was not wed, her fellow Puritans viewed her as a sinner. The majority of the novel is false, save for bits and pieces of "The Custom House,"which is based on Hawthorne working in the that very building of Salem, Massachusetts. Despite that, the discovery of the manuscript is untrue. The Scarlet Letter was written in the style of dark romantic. It takes place at a recognizable place and time, Massachusetts during the 17th century, but many of its contents are made up. That being said, the Scarlett Letter was a book written mostly to show the morality of the characters and how to learn from mistakes.
The plot revolves around a woman who must deal with the consequences of her actions, after she has an affair with a reverend. The themes are based on the effects of keeping secrets and of comitting sin. This book is boring at times, during much of the novel not much happens and nothing really interesting happens. The sentences are way too long and detailed, large enough to be a paragraph in their own right. The moments of the book that really matter are the ones with thematic importance, particularly the scaffhold scenes. This book might relate to today's society by examining the effects of sinning, which is something that will always occur, no matter what era it is.
Read this in high school and again as an adult and I still loved it. Although wordy and sometimes hard to understand, The Scarlett Letters lessons ring true today as much as they did back then. Speaking to a womans place and the unfairness of the blame game when it comes to unwed and pregnant mothers. A good read if this is your ort of thing.
The book goes on and on, in no particular direction. It has a great moral, and a few lines I underlined. Apart from that, there is nothing much to recommend. It is one of those tough-to-read books, dragging on and being a difficult read.