It's sad when you build up such high expectations for something and then come to the reality that no, you set the bar far, far too high, this doesn't even come close to meeting those expectations.
That's how I felt about this book.
I have never read anything by Danielle Steel before, and I highly doubt I will read anything by her again after this. Though to be fair, this was the first and only time I had ever been interested in pursuing a book of hers.
I liked the premise of Sisters, it sounded like it could have been a really interesting story, and I think it would have been...if placed the right hands. It tells the story of (surprise, surprise) four sisters: Candy is the youngest, is 21, and she's a high fashion model. Annie is an artist living in Italy (mid 20's). Tammy is a television producer out in Hollywood, getting ready for the big 3-0. And Sabrina, the oldest, is in her mid 30's and is a New York City lawyer. Only Sabrina and Annie have boyfriends, and Sabrina's has been with her for years and years; he'd like to get married, but Sabrina has a phobia when it comes to marriage (I should mention this is because she's a divorce lawyer). Every year, the four sisters gather in New England with their parents for 4th of July, and that's when "stuff happens". After said "stuff", the sisters have to figure out how they will move forward, both separately and together.
So right there, it sounded like an interesting premise to say the least (it's not necessarily "original", but it sounded interesting at least to me). It's probably easiest for me to split this review in half and explain what I liked, and what I didn't:
**SPOILERS**
What I Liked
While I've noticed some reviewers complaining about this, I really liked the fact that the book began with each sister having her own "introduction chapter". It helped me understand the differences of these four women and where they were coming from.
I also really liked that the book focuses a great deal on the sisters relationship and interactions with one another. While yes, there is romance in the story, it is not your typical romance novel in the sense that the romance is not center-stage. Their relationship is what this story is about, so I liked that *that* remained true to its core.
...And sadly, that's about it, when it comes to the stuff I liked.
What I Didn't Like
*sigh* Where do I start?
I didn't like how *perfect* all the sisters were, in terms of their looks. They're all gorgeous, and Steel is quick to remind you every. other. paragraph (or so it felt). Even when one of them is having a horrible day, even after one of them is in a horrific accident, they still come out looking beautiful with every hair in place and not a blemish or scar or mark on their body.
I have no idea if this is something Steel does in all her books, but one thing I was quick to notice was how *repetitive* she became, repeating things over and over, just to make sure you hadn't forgotten this sister's profession, or this sister's boyfriend, or this sister's condition, and so forth. I found it insulting, as if the author didn't think her readers had brains to make sense of what she had written. Very "dumbed-down".
One little thing that I found annoying was how vague certain descriptions were. For example (MAJOR SPOILER) Annie loses her sight as a result of a car crash which also kills their mother. Annie is the artist living in Italy. All of the sisters think this is absolutely devastating that their sister is blind...because she's an ~*~*artist*~*~. We are told this many times throughout the book, "oh the tragedy of Annie being blind, because she's an artist". I wanted to shout "WHAT KIND OF ARTIST?" Is she a painter? A photographer? A sculptor? Does she sketch? It's never really explained, just that vague "artist" term used over and over.
Also, in regards to Annie's blindness, her family NEVER TELL HER about their mother's death, *or* the fact that she's blind (she has bandages over her eyes) until *AFTER* the funeral, and *AFTER* the bandages are removed. WHAT THE HELL KIND OF "sisters" DO THAT?!? If I were Annie, I'd be pissed as hell on both counts.
But the book's biggest sins are the sisters slut-shaming another woman (they throw the word "slut" around willy nilly to describe someone they don't like, someone who they haven't seen in nearly twenty years) *and* (major spoiler/trigger warning) Candy is drugged and raped, but the book treats it like it's no big deal (she has no memory of the rape, so it's ok, she's perfectly fine) WTF???
There are a few other things, but after mentioning those two, really, does one need others?
Yeah, major disappointment, I really wanted to like this book, I even wanted to give it at least a 2 star rating, but while writing this review, the flaws just built and built to the point where I just don't feel I can justify giving this book more than a single star rating.
The reason I "finished" it was because I was listening to the audio book on a long cross-state road trip. If I were reading this in actual book format, I doubt I would have managed.