This is a four (not five) star, 'pretty darn good' course from one of my fave researchers and theorists Mark Leary.
Leary's work is primarily focused on phenomena related to self awareness and the social construction of the self.
So a lot of the course deals with these, or analogous issues, as well as other tantalizing articles of interest from the annals of research psychology (that's right, I said tantalizing and annals in the same sentence).
Some of Leary's work includes Sociometer Theory, which posits that what we commonly term 'self esteem' is essentially a barometer of social performance.
In other words, people suffer low self esteem when they are somehow underperforming socially, and it's adaptive because it motivates us to improve social function.
Furthermore, telling people (kids in particular) that they are awesome (even if they are not) in order to inflate their self esteem, without actually improving their social function is more or less a fail. Damaging even (see millennials).
Fluffing someone's self esteem is analogous to tinkering with a gas gauge in a car to make it display as full, when the gas tank is actually empty. Seems like a better idea to actually fill the tank right?
This doesn't exactly apply to abuse victims, who have been systematically degraded or otherwise made to feel like garbage, and who have artificially low self esteem, i.e. their sociometer is actually miscalibrated too low.
In cases such as these, people may need therapeutic cognitive restructuring in order to simply see themselves in a realistic and healthy way. That being said, improved social function is also good for them too. That's just sort of good for everyone.
A converse example would be grandiose* narcissists who have, like the opposite problem, with probable similar etiologies, but superficially opposite displays i.e. their their sociometer is miscalibrated too high.
* One of the more interesting issues covered in the course is narcissism. According to Leary, there are two varieties, (a) vulnerable narcissism i.e. the kind where people adopt a narcissistic defense against feelings of low self esteem. And (b) grandiose narcissism i.e. the kind where the person thinks that they are fly AF, but they are actually not in reality very fly at all.
In cases such as these, people may also need some therapeutic cognitive restructuring in order to see themselves in a healthier way. But good luck with that. Odds are pretty high everyone else has the problem if you catch my drift.
Anyway, I call this a pretty darn good course (as opposed to a Great Course) because it's a little less engaging than some of the other Great Courses e.g. Robert Sapolsky's epically awesome Biology And Human Behavior. Or Thad Polk's stupendously sick The Addictive Brain.
Don't let that stop you from getting this course though. It's eminently worth the time, energy and money. In other words, it's great enough, and if the competition wasn't so dang stiff it would definitely be a 'great' course.