Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Investigating Gunpowder Plot

Rate this book
This book attempts to examine the ways in which the government of James I set about discovering the details and ramifications of the Gunpowder Plot. The book also has broader aims, to expand our knowledge of the way this administration adapted itself to emergencies, and to elucidate the means by which the Privy Council and its agents enforced their will within the realm.

330 pages, Hardcover

First published July 1, 1991

13 people want to read

About the author

Mark Nicholls

38 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (28%)
4 stars
0 (0%)
3 stars
3 (42%)
2 stars
2 (28%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Michael Bully.
339 reviews4 followers
November 12, 2020
Crucial read for those studying the Gunpowder Plot. Probably not recommended for those with a casual interest in the subject, the author assumes a familiarity with main events and players within the Gunpowder Treason. Each chapter concludes with pages of footnotes, and the author shows that he has done huge amounts of research in different archives.
Broadly speaking the author accepts the traditional view of the 'Plot. That the plans to blow up Westminster and the intention to launch a rebellion in its aftermath were real enough.. Not afraid to be critical of the official version of events, the author is unconvinced by those writers who have maintained that the 'Plot was a fabrication by the authorities to justify a clampdown on the English Catholics.
Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland was linked to the 'Plot as a distant relative and estate steward he employed-Thomas Percy- being so deeply involved. In fact the very lock up where the gunpowder was stored in the Westminster complex was hired in his name. The two men met together on 4th November 1605. Thomas was killed with other Gunpowder plotters trying to launch an abortive rebellion which ended up with the insurgents being trapped at Holbeach House. So was never in a position to either clear his noble patron's name or to condemn him. The Earl was placed initially placed under house arrest , then arrested, charged and convicted of Contempt in June 1606. He was fined £30,000 , and detained indefinitely, not being released until 1621. The fine was never completely paid.
This book does not treat the Earl as an innocent victim, convicted by an unfortunate association. The author suggests that the Earl was evasive and unconvincing when questioned. Its an important book and a demanding read
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.