TLDR: Irving vs Irving offers a nuanced view of the family's legacy and New Brunswick News, with a well-written narrative and depth but leaves the reader wanting more.
Irving vs Irving by Jacques Poitras takes readers on a journey through the intricate history of New Brunswick News Inc and its intriguing relationship with the influential Irving family. Initially, I expected a narrative akin to Douglas How's biographies on KC Irving and Izaak Walton Killam. However, Poitras diverges from traditional family biographies, delving deeper into the complexities of media, family feuds, and the province of New Brunswick itself.
At the outset, the book captivates with the rise of KC Irving's empire. However, it then shifts its focus predominantly to newspaper publishing, reminiscent of John Zada's Veils of Distortion. The unexpected emphasis on New Brunswick News Inc and its relationship with the Irving family might catch readers off guard, but it sheds light on a crucial aspect of the family's legacy.
While I yearned for a more in-depth exploration of the various Irving companies, the book remains well-structured and accessible. The author's decision to stick with his expertise in newspaper publishing is evident, resulting in a narrative that is both coherent and informative. The occasional mentions of different Irving companies serve as milestones, marking notable events in their history.
The author's struggle to secure firsthand reports is evident, leading to a narrative that relies heavily on limited interviews. Despite this obstacle, Poitras manages to craft a compelling story by skillfully incorporating key interviews, such as those with Joan Irving or Jim and JK, which provide a nuanced perspective and add an extra layer to the narrative.
The book's highlight lies in its revelation of the Irving feud, which serves as a compelling undercurrent throughout the narrative. The author, however, reserves a deeper exploration for the later chapters, particularly in the afterword. This delay adds a layer of suspense and intrigue, making the familial discord a captivating subplot.
Poitras's writing is commendable, striking a balance between accessibility and depth. The book not only educates readers about New Brunswick, the Irving family, and the state of journalism but also offers a nuanced and unbiased perspective. The author's storytelling prowess is evident in the well-crafted narrative, which weaves together historical events, family dynamics, and the evolution of media in the region.
In conclusion, Irving vs Irving is a thought-provoking exploration of the Irving family's influence on New Brunswick News Inc. While the initial focus on KC Irving's empire-building might waver, the book ultimately provides a comprehensive understanding of the family's legacy, the complexities of journalism, and the simmering family feud. Poitras's unbiased approach and skillful storytelling make this book an essential read for those interested in the intersection of family, media, and the history of New Brunswick.