Kabala of Numbers a Handbook of Interpretation

by Sepharial

This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the original. Due to its age, it may contain imperfections such as marks, notations, marginalia and flawed pages. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions that are true to the original work.

Genres: Numerology, Spirituality

432 pages, Paperback

First published November 30, 1912

About the author

Dr Walter Gorn Old (1864-1929) was an eminent English Theosophist, and a notable 19th century mystic and astrologer, better known as Sepharial. He initially studied medicine and followed this up with studies in psychology, oriental languages, astrology and numeurology. In 1886 he started to write an astrology problem page in the Society Times, where he answered the public's questions, and in 1887 at the age of just 23 was admitted to the "inner sanctum" of the Theosophical Society. He was editor of Old Moore's Almanac, which is still published in the 21st century. He was one of the founder members of the Theosophical movement in England. He became a very influential author in the fields of the occult, astrology and numeurology. He can be credited as the first astrologer to use Earth's "dark moon" Lilith in his calculations. His works include: Degrees of the Zodiac Symbolised (with Charubel aka John Thomas) (1898), New Manual of Astrology (1898), The Book of the Simple Way (1904) and The Kabala of Numbers (1913).

Reviews

[Onur · Rating 2 out of 5]

I was surprised to see that this book was written in the end of 1800s. Another thing I was surprised and confused with is the correspondence of planetary energies and their sepharial numbers in the tree of line. For example number 3 is Venus ( not Saturn). I think his system was influenced by vedantic esoterism because I ve never seen such a different system in hermetism or qabalah at all.

[Manikandan Manikandan · Rating 5 out of 5]

Xcellant

[Amber Moors]

pretty good for something written in the 1800s. Pretty interesting for being outdated. Good to know what they thought about back then.

[Bhavikmehta]

Good knowledge

[Georgequan200]

it is okay