This book wanted to be two different books: a book about when the characters were teenagers, and a book about when the characters were adults living with what they experienced as teenagers. It is my opinion that Cecilia Galante should have just chosen one and stuck with it, because she had too many ideas and too many things she wanted to do in a short amount of time. This created writing that was cluttered and inconsistent in tonal and character shifts, forming a novel that felt lacking from beginning to end. I wanted more from the characters. I wanted more from the two settings. I wanted expand upon the psychology of the different topics Galante addressed, rather than just doing an amazing job here and there and telling everything else.
Particularly frustrating were the characters. They felt like plug-ins for a John Green novel, in that they all had their one quirky thing and nothing else notable. With so many loaded topics being addressed, it was hard to forgive the lack of character development in both the present and the past. I didn't feel like I knew the characters, and found myself laughing in disbelief whenever they alluded to That One Quirky Thing. They felt like cliches--honestly, and they shouldn't. As characters dealing with some pretty heavy baggage from their past, there should be a vulnerability and honesty to how they are handled. I don't think that Galante is incapable of this; I just think she could've done some more extensive character planning. There are several moments--particularly when Nora and her boyfriend break it off--that felt beautiful and real, and showed what the novel could've been. Yet ultimately I was disappointed, and concerned with where the two settings reflected on and built towards--another cliche, the one night where everything fell apart.
When I finally found out what happened that one night, it was not what I expected. With an event like this, the people involved need support. They need love. I thought it was inconsistent with the majority of the characters not to give it. Additionally, I was frustrated about how SPOILER ALERT abortion was addressed. It was the choice of the character that got it done. Although I understand why it might make another character feel like she didn't deserve motherhood for participating, I would've liked to see other characters stand up for the choice. The whole discussion of abortion made me uncomfortable, though it's hard to describe exactly why.
I feel as though the natural process of the characters growing apart would've been far more interesting than the cliched "one night" plotline. Galante addressed so many heavy topics in the novel that an additional one feels redundant--not to lessen the importance of addressing abortion, but to point out that it wasn't needed for the merit of its story, and could've reduced some of the clutter going on with the writing itself.
In the end, this book has potential. I don't think I quite addressed that in my review, but it DOES have some really good ideas and makes some good points. Unfortunately the execution is all over the place, and could've used some work. With a few rewrites, and some serious reevaluation of the laughable quirk forced down my throat, I think that this novel would've been a good one.