Interesting and insufficient….
I liked the beginning of this book the most. Early portions deal with filters and differing theological viewpoints and it seems to do so in a bit more even-handed of a way than it does as it goes on.
Towards the end of the book, it feels more like a vehicle to decidedly disagree with and dismiss certain ways of looking at certain passages or issues. For example, the chapter on atonement theory feels like less of an exploration of penal substitution and more a refutation of it and a defense for Christus Victor. It also seems to me that if one theological viewpoint is “clearly” true according to one group and another is “clearly” true to another, then nothing is “clearly” true. We must wrestle with scripture and live in tension…
Ultimately, the survey portion of the book (first section) is good. It fails to live up to its title, as OT wisdom literature isn’t given its own section, nor are minor prophets, nor are epistles (so how can I understand the “whole” Bible without understanding these more clearly?) Perhaps that is not the authors intent, but the title of the book seems to indicate it is!
I’d sooner see it renamed as “a survey of the covenants” as I do appreciate the elaboration on the Noahic, Abrahamic, Mosaic and Davidic covenants, and that seems to be the thrust of the book.
I also came into this book with a pinch of salt already in hand, as someone I’ve not heard of (no disrespect intended) comes along with a book that’s supposed to help me understand the whole Bible, and his credentials are being president of his own (supernatural) Bible school and originating a new theological system….get your salt shakers ready, too.
All told, worth a read. See what you agree and disagree with!