Right off the bat, I already had a problem with some of the ideas our trio had, like how they define cheating. For me, that necessitates a willful disregard for or violation of the rules. For example, copying from another student's test answers is cheating, and so is having someone else make your project for you. However, bending the system to your favor, while arguably unfair, doesn't necessarily make one a cheat to me. It's not the A&A twins's fault that they had Advanced Placement and Honors classes in their previous school. If anything, it should be Hollander High's policies that should be blamed.
Also, the ethical implications of the entire thing is rather disturbing. If they wanted to punish liars and cheaters due to indignation and a sense of justice, then it's just their methods that would be questionable. But to "punish" people primarily to benefit yourself or for personal revenge - they'd scarcely have a moral leg to stand on.
It's a good thing that our players don't openly brag (even to each other) that what they're doing was right. Maybe deep inside, they did believe that two wrongs don't make a right. In any case, they're in for a huge surprise, as their game takes a serious, deadlier turn.
The first games resulted in someone being admitted in intensive care, in a reputation being ripped to tatters, and in death. Right then and there, it seemed as if there's a mysterious agency at work, a fourth player who makes sure that their plots come to unexpectedly cruel conclusions. They wanted to stop, but the game has taken a life of its own, and they're powerless to stop it until everyone in their hit list gets their comeuppance. It's up to our trio to figure out who's playing for keeps.
I think the book is a good lesson for people who think that justice and revenge amount to the same thing. What seems worthy of punishment for someone hardly merits a reprimand for another. Is a star player leaving his team because he no longer enjoys his sport really a selfish douche? I commend our leads for owning up to this. For all their immaturity, they occasionally betray deep insights.
I'm rating it 6.5/10 or 3 stars out of 5.