A phrase I find myself using a lot now is 'History is written by the winners' but I fought to approach this with an open mind for two reasons: firstly, that I think the saying is largely true, and secondly, it was written by Alistair Campbell, a successful but thoroughly detestable figure. I don't think I was converted on either count but Campbell uses his contacts well to get a lot of interesting profiles, but is let down by an acceptance that their word is Gospel, and in a bid to make himself the story, tries to prove that everyone wins by his 'OST' mantra.
The book's strength comes from interviews with winners from a range of fields, from politics, sport and business, which works both ways. On the one hand, we should get a genuine insight from figures such as Jose Mourinho, Haile Gebrselassie and Sir Charles Dunstone. On the other hand, Anna Wintour and Richard Branson get to put out their brand unchallenged, with the former dismissing claims of how she got ahead in her career and the latter promoting Virgin almost as a service that just gives people what they want, rather than a business which exists to make a profit.
Campbell opted to go for themes first, then to fit the profiles amongst them, and his key themes could pretty much be boiled down to 'OST' and 'work hard'. OST is 'objective, strategy and tactics', and an interesting approach to succeeding, but Campbell tied himself in all sorts of knots to prove the validity of this theory, especially when challenged by Mourinho. This was quite revealing, as Mourinho is famously a reactive manager, whose tactics are his 'strategy', and as Campbell tried to fit this to his threory he contradicted his earlier claim that strategy has to come before the tactics. Without a shred of irony, Campbell later discusses how winners are always prepared to learn from their mistakes and challenge their misconceptions. We also learn you have to 'work hard' which obviously is needed to succeed, but the implication is that with hard work and a clear objective you too can win - when surely rivals of Team Sky also had the objective to win the Tour de France? Surely the Conservative party also had the objective to win the 1997 General Election?
This is the crucial problem with most analysis of winners, looking at what they do and assuming that's the winning formula. But the key test is to look at the losers as well and ask what is different about them. Nick Faldo and Ian Botham may well have had the extra drive to succeed when told by a careers advisor to look at a proper sport, but what about the footballers who work hard, get dropped at 20 and have no qualifications? Surely some of those had drive too? I knew someone who was determined to prove his doubting teachers wrong and get to Oxford, and didn't. Campbell later talks about Usain Bolt, who freely admits to having a few more freedoms in his training regime, but he was still the best, and proves that, actually, the only way we can prove we're winners is by winning. But you can't market a self-help book like that.
There was a lot of vague talk in here, sometimes verging on buzzwords, and that makes it easier to fit your narrative into the story. But a revealing part for me was Matthew Benham talking about betting on Euro 2016. Having decided Spain were undervalued, he put a large winning bet on them, which Campbell proffered as evidence he was a winner. But Spain could still have been undervalued and lost, or overvalued and won. A bad bet can still win you money and a good bet lose you money, as Benham would definitely know, but Campbell knew he was a winner, and therefore his stories were treated as successful. So what makes someone a winner? They've won. Other people worked hard but they were better so they took the plaudits, and no matter how hard you work, you probably won't be the best either.