I have read all 8 of the Seasons of Serendipity books by Elizabeth Ann West (yes, there are 8, though the last two are technically Seasons of Serendipity Bride books) and have rated all of them 3 stars. I honestly didn’t want to read all of them after I finished the first two, they were not impressive. But since all the books are very short I decided to continue. Instead of writing a review recapping each individual book I decided to write one review for all of them as the problems I had span all the books. There are spoilers so be warned. One last note; I strive to right very honest reviews, keeping in mind that I am critiquing the work of a fellow human being. I try not to be mean or nasty or unnecessarily unkind. I do not believe that just because no one knows who I am, it gives me the freedom or the right, to be awful and venomous. With that in mind, here we go:
The stories are good but not great. I refer to the overall stories, not the way they’re written. One of the things that I didn’t understand was how the author scatters the Bennet sisters all over the place, some are in London, another at Pemberly, another at Matlock, another at Meryton, another in Scotland. They’re supposed to be in mourning and they are truly devastated by their father’s death. But they’re so quick to split up at the drop of a hat. So in the end, with the exception of the first part of the first book, the sisters are not all together in one place until years later at the end of the last book. I like the P&P variations that have a cozy, home and hearth feeling. If you’re like me you won’t like these books, they’re just constantly traveling at an alarming rate. No sooner do two sisters reach their destination then one of them is feeling uncomfortable and hopping back in a carriage with all their belongings to visit someone or just to get away. It’s crazy. Then there are things like Mary and Jane have a huge fight and they’re giving each other evil stares and Jane keeps giving Mary the cold shoulder; not characteristic of these two characters at all. And very childish. Here’s another one, Elizabeth wants to make sure all the servants in her employ know how to read. Now, that’s not at all alarming and it’s not even unheard of for the period. There were many peers of the realm who uncharacteristically went against the norm and were very kind to their servants. But she takes over Mrs. Reynold’s personal office, much to the housekeeper’s chagrin, in order to set up a school for all the servants. Where they will learn reading, writing and math. In several shifts, of course, since they can’t neglect their duties. With further plans to teach the children of the village and then sends Jane, who’s living in the Darcy estate in Scotland, a letter asking her to do the same in that estate. Lydia is not only her usual self-absorbed self, she goes far beyond what any normal person would put up with. I wonder if Elizabeth West possibly meant for this character to have some sort of mental disability. Or possibly a syndrome like Asperger. The character is so beyond the self-absorption Lydia from the original that it boggles the mind. She shows up at the Darcy townhome in London pregnant and unmarried with her mother in tow. She walks in without a care in the world talking about her dear Wickham and asking to go to the theatre and wanting to know when the next ball is. Her mother acts the same way despite everyone else in the family looking on them astonished. At no point do either Lydia or her mother ever get called to the mat. At no point do either of them show any shame or realization of what a dangerous situation Lydia is in. It’s not just odd, it’s alarming.
Next is how choppy and disconnected the writing is. Scenes and descriptions of rooms and goings-on are not fleshed out; they’re disjointed and confusing. I had to go back and read full paragraphs only to find that I didn’t read them correctly, it wasn’t my misreading something, it was the writing.
The elder matrons are always portrayed as meddlesome and troublemakers. In the case of the Dowager Lady Hamilton and Mrs. Bennet the portrayal makes sense though it’s very over the top (the Dowager actually reads Mary Bennet’s letters while Mary is sick and then makes no excuses about it! Instead of having to apologize the author portrays her as a dowdy, impulsive elder woman who we’re supposed to find just adorable and incorrigible). But in Lady Matlock’s case Darcy and Elizabeth are just downright rude to her. All the girls are split up, Darcy and Elizabeth are off to Pemberly to live in wedded bliss and Mary, Georgiana and Kitty are left to their own devices in London! So Lady Matlock takes them under her wing, takes them shopping, buys them new wardrobes and starts giving them daily classes on dancing and etiquette and a whole bunch of other lessons in anticipation of their first season the following year. Well Elizabeth and Darcy arrive in town and are completely incensed that Lady Matlock has taken it on herself to educate the girls and even more, Elizabeth can’t believe that all Lady Matlock has educated them in is etiquette and dancing! She states that she expects them to learn more than just place settings, that they should know about the world. Not even realizing that it was her and Darcy’s neglect that caused Lady Matlock to step in. Oh, and previously Jane was assaulted at a house party that Lady Matlock had taken her to by a horrible man. So Elizabeth and Darcy lay that at Lady Matlock’s feet as well. They are so rude to her and in the end it’s Lady Matlock who has to apologize to Elizabeth. There are bizarre story choices like that throughout all the books.
Finally there are the many, many spelling and grammatical errors. Captain Tompkins is first introduced as Captain Toompkins. I wasn’t sure if it was a mistake until a few paragraphs after where his name is spelled correctly. And the grammatical errors are worse. “His” used when it should be “her”, “off” used instead of “of”, and the like. Then, at one point Mary is speaking with the Dowager Duchess Hamilton and TWICE, instead of saying “Your Grace” to the Dowager, she says “My Grace” Twice in two paragraphs! One type of grammatical error that I try to excuse is when authors write “He was the person she wanted to speak to”, which is incorrect but so many do it that it’s become the norm. The more grammatically correct way is to write, “He was the person to whom she wanted to speak”. Ending the sentence with the word “to” is poor writing, especially in a period book. But in one of the books I actually read, “He was the person to whom she wanted to speak to”. Another error that, surprisingly, many authors make and few editors or proof readers notice, is when they make the grammatical error of saying, for example, “She was the one that…” when it should be “She was the one who…” I understand writing fast when you’re on a roll and missing it. But several people read books before they’re ever published. Even many self-published books are read and re-read (though not all) before they publish. There were too many of these types of mistakes in Elizabeth West’s books to excuse. Particularly since they’re supposed to be so popular and everyone supposedly loves her books. I find it hard to believe that books that are this popular have not been properly proof read or edited.
In the end I get increasingly tired of excusing lazy writing. Elizabeth Ann West has been called a Jane-of-all-trades, mistress of none. And while the original quote (made by William Shakespeare, supposedly) ends with “…but often times better than a master of one”, I’m afraid to say that this saying, as far as Elizabeth Ann West is concerned, is not a compliment. It’s possible that she needs to spend more time on the trade of writing of her books…