Binge reviewing my best-read Horror-Thriller short stories, anthologies and novellas of all time
There’s something deliciously wicked about ‘Popsy’—that quintessential Stephen King short story that sneaks up on you like a shadow at dusk, smiling with childlike innocence until you realise it’s hiding fangs. ‘Popsy’ is a story that feels deceptively small—a simple horror sketch about a man, a boy, and a van—but inside its compact frame, it carries the pulse of a gothic parable about guilt, predation, and the monstrous within us all.
The premise is disturbingly straightforward: Sheridan, a desperate man drowning in gambling debt, has resorted to abducting children for a human trafficking ring.
When he spots a small boy alone at a shopping mall, it looks like an easy score. However, the child—frighteningly calm, preternaturally composed—keeps mentioning his “‘Popsy’”, who will come soon to get him.
Sheridan assumes it’s the rambling of a frightened kid. King, of course, knows better.
What unfolds is a masterclass in tension. Sheridan’s thoughts unravel in a haze of greed, fear, and sweaty justification. King does not romanticise or redeem him—he’s pathetic, vile, and yet human enough to make the reader squirm with complicity. The abduction goes wrong, inevitably, when the boy’s mysterious ‘Popsy’ shows up.
Moreover, let us just say that when King writes a rescue scene, it’s not your average Hallmark reunion. The reveal of ‘Popsy’s true nature—bat-like wings, glowing eyes, and a fatherly fury that turns the predator into prey—is swift, shocking, and darkly satisfying.
It’s easy to read ‘Popsy’ as a mere revenge fantasy, a moral comeuppance cloaked in supernatural horror. However, linger a bit, and it deepens. The story’s genius lies in how it flips the moral compass: the real monster is human, and the supernatural being—’Popsy’, the vampire—is a parent protecting his child.
King reclaims the mythic figure of the vampire from centuries of gothic villainy and reimagines him as the ultimate guardian. It’s as if Dracula had evolved into a creature of domestic tenderness, fiercely loyal and terrifyingly capable.
This inversion of fear is vintage King. He has always understood that monsters are reflections, not aberrations. ‘Popsy’ makes that literal. The human trafficker’s van becomes a confessional on wheels—a symbol of human depravity masquerading as normalcy, while the supernatural creature becomes a figure of justice in a world where morality has collapsed.
Stylistically, ‘Popsy’ hums with King’s late-’80s confidence: lean prose, cinematic rhythm, and psychological immediacy. He writes Sheridan’s panic in escalating staccato beats—each thought twitching with self-deception and dread.
You can smell the sweat, the cigarette smoke, and the stale guilt. And when ‘Popsy’ descends, the prose breaks into a fever dream of sensory overload—flapping wings, shrieks, metallic blood, and a sky torn open. King’s pacing is impeccable: dread, denial, revelation, and then retribution.
Beneath all that horror, there is something heartbreakingly moral about the story. The bond between ‘Popsy’ and the boy is pure and unshakeable, and King lets that purity burn against Sheridan’s corruption. It is almost Biblical—the sinner swallowed by his sin, the innocent carried away by divine (or vampiric) grace. It feels like a parable told by a modern-day Hawthorne after a bad dream and a few too many late-night coffees.
And let’s be honest: ‘Popsy’ also works as a wicked little thrill ride. It’s short, punchy, and gleefully grotesque—the kind of story that reminds you why horror is fun. There’s something cathartic about seeing evil punished not by bureaucracy or justice, but by something primal and cosmic. It’s horror as emotional equilibrium: the universe setting itself right through terror.
Still, what lingers isn’t the gore—it’s the irony. The man who preys on innocence is undone by love. The monster who should terrify us becomes the embodiment of protection. King does not just scare you; he rearranges your moral wiring mid-scream.
What impact did this have on me?
Reading ‘Popsy’ felt like stepping into one of those recurring King dreams where guilt takes physical shape. I remember finishing it late at night and feeling that uncanny mix of satisfaction and disquiet. The story did not just entertain me—it judged me, quietly. It made me confront how easily we rationalise horror when it wears a human face, and how quick we are to demonise what we do not understand.
The moment ‘Popsy’s’ wings unfurled, I felt that jolt of poetic justice that only King can pull off—the kind where horror feels like redemption in disguise.
It changed how I think about short horror fiction: that you can write about monsters, yes, but also about the moral architecture of the universe, about love so fierce it turns into vengeance.
Why should you read this today?
Because ‘‘Popsy’’ hits differently in an age where real-life horrors play out on newsfeeds daily. It is a story about what happens when innocence is endangered and when evil mistakes itself for cleverness.
It is short, sharp, and moral in a way modern fiction often shies away from.
You should read it today because it’s King at his most stripped-down—no sprawling mythology, no metafictional loops, just raw, visceral storytelling that grabs you by the throat and whispers, “You get what you give.”
It is horror as moral clarity, a gothic fable that makes you cheer for the creature and recoil from the man.
Moreover, maybe most importantly, because it reminds us that sometimes—just sometimes—the monsters are the only ones who still remember how to love.