What do you think?
Outside Looking In: Three Decades Representing the Hasidic Jewish Community of Kiryas Joel, New York
216 pages, Paperback
Published October 1, 2026
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
Review of advance copy received from Edelweiss+
Kiryas Joel is an Hasidic Jewish community in Orange County, New York that was built by a Satmar sect of Hasidic Jews primarily of Hungarian ancestry. The founder of the Satmar sect had settled in Brooklyn, and then decided a more secluded environment would be better for their religious community. The congregation members have large families and the community has grown very quickly and faced harsh, antisemitic criticism from the surrounding county residents.
The Kiryas Joel controversy involves long-running legal, political, and social disputes which center on these key issues:
1) Church-State Separation and School Districts
The Supreme Court Case: In 1990, the New York legislature created a separate public school district whose boundaries matched the village of Kiryas Joel, specifically to provide publicly funded special-education services to disabled children within the insular religious community.
The Legal Challenge: Critics argued that tailoring a public school district's borders explicitly to a single religious community violated the Establishment Clause regarding the separation of church and state.
The Ruling: The legal battle led to the landmark 1994 U.S. Supreme Court case Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, in which the court ruled 6–3 that drawing school district lines to match a specific religious group was unconstitutional.
Rapid Growth and Annexation Disputes
Geographic Expansion: Kiryas Joel has experienced explosive population growth driven by large family sizes and high retention rates, leading to severe housing density.
2) Tensions with Neighbors: The village has engaged in prolonged disputes with neighboring towns (such as Monroe and Woodbury) over land annexation to accommodate new high-density housing developments.
3) Local Voting Power: Neighboring property owners and residents have expressed concerns that high-density developments and coordinated block voting, guided by community leadership, allow Kiryas Joel to heavily influence or control local municipal decisions. Kiryas Joel has a 70 voter turnout rate because of a very active phone bank system.
4) Public Assistance and Social Media Scrutiny of Welfare and Demographics: Because many households feature large families and full-time Torah scholars who earn modest incomes or work in localized non-profit or service roles, a high percentage of residents qualify for and rely on government assistance programs like Medicaid and food stamps.
5) Online Exposes: Viral media coverage and online commentators have frequently targeted the community's public assistance usage to frame the village negatively, prompting backlash, accusations of sensationalized or antisemitic framing, and widespread discussions regarding privacy, cultural misunderstandings, and the distinction between legal welfare utilization and fraud.
The author of the book is the county elected representative for Orange County, and his experience working with the Satmar community has been nothing but a positive experience. Yet he has faced on a shocking, stonewall of antisemitism from the other constituents and their leaders.
I have attended a Hasidic congregation for many years and I always in awe of their love toward the Jewish community such as visiting Jews in hospitals, prisons and those on military duty. They have missions all over the world that do this, not just in New York.
A Satmar rabbi told Michael that he was not Jewish but he was Hasidic. The term Hasid means someone who trembles at the word of the Lord. The rabbi was acknowledging Michael’s respect for their observance of the Jewish faith.
The Kiryas Joel controversy involves long-running legal, political, and social disputes which center on these key issues:
1) Church-State Separation and School Districts
The Supreme Court Case: In 1990, the New York legislature created a separate public school district whose boundaries matched the village of Kiryas Joel, specifically to provide publicly funded special-education services to disabled children within the insular religious community.
The Legal Challenge: Critics argued that tailoring a public school district's borders explicitly to a single religious community violated the Establishment Clause regarding the separation of church and state.
The Ruling: The legal battle led to the landmark 1994 U.S. Supreme Court case Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, in which the court ruled 6–3 that drawing school district lines to match a specific religious group was unconstitutional.
Rapid Growth and Annexation Disputes
Geographic Expansion: Kiryas Joel has experienced explosive population growth driven by large family sizes and high retention rates, leading to severe housing density.
2) Tensions with Neighbors: The village has engaged in prolonged disputes with neighboring towns (such as Monroe and Woodbury) over land annexation to accommodate new high-density housing developments.
3) Local Voting Power: Neighboring property owners and residents have expressed concerns that high-density developments and coordinated block voting, guided by community leadership, allow Kiryas Joel to heavily influence or control local municipal decisions. Kiryas Joel has a 70 voter turnout rate because of a very active phone bank system.
4) Public Assistance and Social Media Scrutiny of Welfare and Demographics: Because many households feature large families and full-time Torah scholars who earn modest incomes or work in localized non-profit or service roles, a high percentage of residents qualify for and rely on government assistance programs like Medicaid and food stamps.
5) Online Exposes: Viral media coverage and online commentators have frequently targeted the community's public assistance usage to frame the village negatively, prompting backlash, accusations of sensationalized or antisemitic framing, and widespread discussions regarding privacy, cultural misunderstandings, and the distinction between legal welfare utilization and fraud.
The author of the book is the county elected representative for Orange County, and his experience working with the Satmar community has been nothing but a positive experience. Yet he has faced on a shocking, stonewall of antisemitism from the other constituents and their leaders.
I have attended a Hasidic congregation for many years and I always in awe of their love toward the Jewish community such as visiting Jews in hospitals, prisons and those on military duty. They have missions all over the world that do this, not just in New York.
A Satmar rabbi told Michael that he was not Jewish but he was Hasidic. The term Hasid means someone who trembles at the word of the Lord. The rabbi was acknowledging Michael’s respect for their observance of the Jewish faith.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review