Odd, odd, odd. The odd colloquialisms (US phrases via an Aussie's ear??) plus the sometimes Yoda-ish syntax, made it odd to read - to the point of distracting from flow (plot and dialogue). Terms related to racism, misogyny, and other biases all too often were used not to highlight inappropriate attitudes, but just as regular descriptions. This was perhaps the least palatable oddity. Less distracting (but still worth editing), regular vocabulary choices were to advanced for daily conversation - even for characters with PhDs. Oddly wide swings on psychological insight/expertise; the tone ranged from self-assured insight to just silly (not by character, but by plot/theme underpinnings). Delmonico isn't dumb, but it seems to be his wife that is the actual brains - maybe I needed to have read 1-3 to agree that this wasn't odd/illogical. Odd juxtaposition of cartoon villain-y characters (the sisters, the sister in law) and small town, more realistically wrought cops. Speaking of cops, would they really turn their eye from a key suspect just b/c she's well known by the force? And the suspects? Well, if this had been written more as a psych thriller than standard gum shoe, a slow reveal of their backgrounds and proclivities could've worked. As written, there were a lot of things hidden from and then dumped on the reader. Not red herrings or oblique references...just sudden reveals or super-convenient plot twists. There was some clever weaving in of the biochemists' science, forensic work, and even geopolitical history to enhance character details and plot. So that was 'oddly refreshing.' Instead of just conveying a decades old setting, it's almost as if it were written decades ago in terms of language use, attitudes, and plot structure.