Ok...after viewing the reviews and criticisms of the historical, social, and occult roles of the Tarot, I need to rectify the record. Before basing a final opinion what is and is not the cultural role / use of the Tarot, one should provide a more robust, scholarly list of sources, rather than a single source. Secondly, one should provide a legitimate analysis of the various understandings of the historical and cultural uses of the Tarot. In terms of the Tarot being "only" a deck of playing cards, this is not actually accurate. The Tarot has been historically validated as BOTH a deck of playing cards and a tool for self-reflection / divination by a number of respected studies, start with Robert Place's - The Tarot: History, Symbolism and Divination. Then using his analysis compare, contrast with other books on the topic of the historical/social/cultural uses of the Tarot deck(s). Use the hypothesis that Place's perspective may or may not be accurate, then move forward and provide a robust, scholarly analysis. Based on this research, THEN, provide a tentative conclusion that the Tarot is ONLY a deck of playing cards and was appropriated by occultists.
Now in terms of this book, I enjoyed it. In terms of transparency, I am a student of the Tarot, following the Jungian / phenomenological / synchronicity paths of analysis. No one book is every the definitive, final, full story of any topic. The quality of the book, the paper, and the illustrations, the book as an object is impressive. For me, the book will be an important contributor to my base of knowledge about the Tarot.