Life can sometimes thrust us into troubling circumstances that threaten to undo our thin mastery over those things that matter most. In this moving and thought-provoking volume, Arthur Kleinman tells the unsettling stories of a handful of men and women, some of whom have lived through some of the most fundamental transitions of the turbulent twentieth century. Here we meet an American veteran of World War II, tortured by the memory of the atrocities he committed while a soldier in the Pacific. A French-American woman aiding refugees in sub-Saharan Africa, facing the utter chaos of a society where life has become meaningless. A Chinese doctor trying to stay alive during Mao's cultural revolution, discovering that the only values that matter are those that get you beyond the next threat. These individuals have found themselves caught in circumstances where those things that matter most to them--their desires, status, relationships, resources, political and religious commitments, life itself--have been challenged by the society around them. Each is caught up in existential moral experiences that define what it means to be human, with an intensity that makes their life narratives arresting. Their stories reveal just how malleable moral life is, and just how central danger is to our worlds and our livelihood. Indeed, Kleinman offers in this book a groundbreaking approach to ethics, examining "who we are" through some of the most disturbing issues of our time--war, globalization, poverty, social injustice, sex, and religion--all in the context of actual lived moral life. Here then are riveting stories of ordinary men and women, in extraordinary times and threatening situations, making sense of their worlds and facing profound challenges to what matters most in their lives.
I will have to reread this book to arrive, to be able to better extrapolate the findings and the argument. The author being an anthropologist, researcher, and a psychiatrist certainly allows him to analyze different patients in several lights. Very interesting. I have actually retained only 20% of what I have read due to not having written notes. Will reread and update. Any individual interested in human rights advocacy, or any other kind of advocacy should mandatorily read the book.
This is a book written in 2007, and I read about it while reading another book. Thought-provoking work of a psychiatrist, and a professor of medical anthropology and cross-cultural psychiatry. We meet key characters based on his patients, an American soldier who shot a Japanese doctor during WW2, an aid worker who worked tirelessly in Africa, a Chinese professor who lived in Mao's China - all of these individuals found themselves caught in circumstances where those things that matter most to them (their desires, status, relationships, resources, political and religious commitments, life itself) were challenged by the circumstances they were faced with. This challenge, and how each grapples with how to do the right thing in those circumstances, becomes a defining moral, existential experience. As a psychiatrist, Kleinman shows that while modern psychiatry aims to eradicate the feelings on suffering, anxiety, pain, guilt, that perhaps facing the feelings, the crisis so to speak is an essential part of human life and enables us - at that point of danger/crisis to realise what matters to us.
This was one of those rare 'ahhhhhhhh' books: a sheer pleasure to read--not as entertainment but as a meaningful experience. As Kleinman states in the Introduction, dangers and uncertainties are an inescapable dimension of our lives and they make life matter. He then explores the 'quality of the anti-heroic everydayness' through stories some of his patients and friends have told him about their lives. This is a book that lives and breathes for me and that I'll be referring back to for many years to come. I'm also going to lobby hard to have it as a future health sciences common book at my university.
Firstly, I should underscore that this wasn't the easiest book to read, not in the sense that the author has not provided the clarity of language to the reader. What I would caution the reader is to follow and read the narrative and the language of Dr. Kleinman in as much clarity of mind that you, the reader, could afford to muster. Fear not, this book is not densely packed with anthropological lingo. It provides a "front-seat“ view of the doctor's most private conversations with his patients which he has interviewed over different periods of his practice, illuminating in each chapter the humanity, mental struggles, and ethical conundrums that have befallen each of them. These lives have prompted the good doctor to ask: what then, really matters to us, and what are the effects that they have on our lives as we strive to live by them or to shape our paths towards them? This book does not aim to tell you what really matters to each of us. Rather, Dr. Kleinman provides the arguments, the questions, illustrates someone else's scenarios to guide us through a mental exercise. At the end of the book, I found a part of my mental self a bit more filled up with the confidence to answer that question truthfully. To know what really matters is, inevitably, the only way to live honestly.
Although it styles itself as a work of moral philosophy, this book is actually a series of autobiographical essays. Are they interesting? Sure. But are they educational? I'll let the author answer that himself with an excerpt from the conclusion of the book:
"How, then, to live? What to do? Those huge questions are foundational to ethics, religion, and political theory. They are not ones that I am prepared to answer with a specific prescription for living. I barely am able to muddle through; I have no such prescription. No one does, I contend."
230-ish pages, and that's the conclusion we're left with. Thanks, Arthur.
To be clear, I enjoyed the book. If we're judging it as a memoir, then I found it pretty adequate. But as a work of philosophy, it is floundering and vague. Despite the title, Kleinman has no idea "what really matters" in life.
Kleinman uses the life stories of 6 people plus his own to discuss the philosophical issues of "what really matters". I was very moved by two of the portraits: Idi Bosquet-Remarque and Yan Zhongshu. Their life stories should be discussed in schools to help young people think about the choices they have to make in this world, what kind of person are they going to be, what will be their values, what kinds of sacrifices are they willing to make for those values? All readers will be prompted to think about their own decision in life.
Kleinman focuses on the concept of "being moral", using a very broad definition of that. I personally would not have used that particular concept because to me it has too much of a religious connotation. I would have used concepts from existential psychology, but Kleinman is the author, not me.
I suspect that each reader will find something different to value in this book. If you have any interest in philosophy and psychology, give it a try...
Beautifully written. Kleinman tells the tales of a variety of people, including himself, which brings insight into the complexity of the human condition. He is a psychiatrist who is also an anthropologist, and although he hasn't a formal degree in it, I'd argue he is also a philosopher. He's morally engaged with his reflections, and although not against prescribing medications where apparently needed, he appreciates the moral struggles that we humans face which aren't necessarily psychiatric conditions. He argues that our moral reality is within our localised situations, and that can be extremely difficult to navigate. In navigating our moral situations, we often encounter suffering. It is in this suffering that we often find what matters most.
The book had a lot to unpack with each individual story told throughout the book. I think the author does a good job of wrapping up these thoughts in his epilogue. Overall worth reading; if not for the message, then for the historical, social, and moral challenges of real people throughout history!
Read this book many years ago but misplaced my copy — very articulate discussion of responses to moral uncertainty and injustice. The second chapter about a humanitarian worker is an accurate depiction of vicarious trauma without using those words. I’ve thought of it many times over the years.
A masterfully written, short, paramount book on morality. What the scholar is presenting is a very unique angle. A book in the intersection of all these; religion, philosophy, psychology, anthropology.
I liked this one. (I had to read this for my final orale exam). Definitely a new way for me to look at life. Really liked all the ethnographic samples.
I'm afraid I came away from this one more disappointed than anything else. Quite frankly if this were a two word review those words would be "confused muddle." I failed to see the connection between the anecdotes (though most were very interesting standing alone), and had I been able to figure out the main point of this book to my own satisfaction I doubt I'd have been able to connect said anecdotes to that point.
And in one sense I really butt heads with the author: I simply could not see in his "Idi" the heroine that he did. Quite frankly portions of her life seemed like nothing so much as some sort of exercise in self-flagellation, whether as some sort of atonement for the sins of her grandfather (which Kleinman brought up many times himself, curiously) or as a weird interpretation of a very weird doctrine -- her "commitment to Liberation Theology" -- or as something else entirely I honestly have no idea. And undoubtedly she did more good in one year than I shall ever do in my lifetime, that part I do not question. It was her motivation and attitude while doing it that rang false with me.
And, even more strangely, if you accept the one place in the work where generalizing occurs, in the Epilogue, I see no way someone like "Idi" could be used as an avatar of this "remaking of the moral life" Kleinman presents. Subjectivity? She was certainly a pragmatist, but it was pragmatism harnessed to an ultimate goal of something she felt was objectively correct, or at any rate I don't see how to conclude otherwise. I'm also unsure how "local cultural representations" and "social experience" apply to her, or even how they avoided colliding as she tried to, say, keep women from being raped. Perhaps there is a "local cultural representation" vis a vis rape as wrong in all cases in the parts of Africa she worked, but the problem seemed so widespread I'd need to see evidence nowhere presented in the book in support of this claim. Leading me to wonder how was it anything but her "social experience" as a Westerner that motivated her to act as she did? (Which I guess would also knock the pin out of the "subjectivity" leg of his triad?)
Perhaps everything I've said in this review is a product of my own ignorance, as I am certainly not the expert in these matters Kleinman is. But I'll go out on a limb and assume I'm also a member of the reasonably intelligent general public Kleinman is hoping to reach via this book. Well, in my case, he obviously did not, whether my thoughts are right, wrong or somewhere in between. A very odd book, at any rate. I had to give him two stars for making an effort to tackle an extremely difficult topic, a topic I personally would not even know where to begin with. But, yes, my "confused muddle" thought still stands.