I am so annoyed right now I had to write a mini-review of page 67 (which is as far as I have gotten, so far). Page 67 says, speaking of the difficulty of getting into a small boat: "Imagine yourself in a long, full skirt and stays that prevent you from bending".
Some of you are probably already laughing (Bonnie?), knowing how the rest of this review is going to go.
I thought better of this author, I really, really did. The previous 66 pages were fabulous, and I learned a great deal, or at least...I think I did. My new knowledge is now more than a little suspect. How does the author suppose that, if you are unable to *bend* in a corset, you are able to sit? And yet, just a few more words down the page, she blithely has her imaginary stays-handicapped "you" easily accomplish this clearly impossible task!
One more time for the record: you CAN bend in a corset. Can you slouch? No - and that's the *only* handicap you're going to experience in a well-fitted corset, and if you listen to your mother, you shouldn't be slouching anyway, so that's all right, isn't it?
Update upon finishing it:
Four stars, because I did learn a great deal of interesting things, and it's inspired me to get copies of Samuel Pepys' unabridged diaries - something I've been wanting to do for some time.
I do recommend however, when reading this book, to take all the author's personal opinions with a grain of salt...she seems to be one of those women who must force their modern views onto the women of different eras, and make false assumptions about how unhappy the women of yesterday must have been. For instance, in the chapter on marriage and divorce, she rants on about how, without divorce as an option, women had to suffer being "irrevocably tied to a husband who turned out to be a violent, drunken, syphilitic, promiscuous lout who dissipated her dowry, brutally exercised his matrimonial rights, and abused her children". She gives no mention at all of the fact that the husband was himself equally bound, and of course there were many wives who proved just as abusive, drunken, or promiscuous, and were also legally impossible to discard. She also gives no mention of the fact that when divorce began to become an option, it was the *women* who were horrified and disapproving of this new custom. It is a fundamental and serious mistake to assume that just because *we* wouldn't have liked living under certain conditions, that the majority opinion from women of the actual time would agree with us.