Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Common Prayer on Common Ground: A Vision of Anglican Orthodoxy

Rate this book
Responding to the controversy and divisiveness within the Anglican Communion, particularly over the issue of homosexuality, Alan Jones offers a more balanced look at the middle way to be found within Anglican orthodoxy. With its focus on careful listening and prayerful deliberation, Jones's vision of orthodoxy is the antidote to the anger and bitterness that threatens the Body of Christ today.

In this thoughtful volume, Jones takes a look at Anglicanism from four different perspectives, fundamentalism versus modernism, the tired caricature of Anglicanism as muddled thinking, as an orientation toward transcendent mystery, and through the eyes of some of Anglicanism's greatest exemplars.

115 pages, Paperback

First published May 1, 2006

8 people want to read

About the author

Alan W. Jones

12 books12 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (33%)
4 stars
2 (33%)
3 stars
1 (16%)
2 stars
1 (16%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Mark.
94 reviews1 follower
December 30, 2023
2 ½ stars.

The best part by far is the final 15-page section on John Donne, which also reads like a separate essay that was tacked on to the book.

A highly uneven and irregularly bumpy ride marred by a few recurring annoyances:
* Far too many extended quotations from other writers, including obscure novelists. Every page has a long quotation from someone else.
* Far too much first-person-singular anecdote. For someone who seems to be writing about the importance of the virtue of Humility, there’s a lot of what smells a lot like hubris
* Vatican II! Buddhism! (Sic) Celtic! Eastern Orthodox Apophatic tradition! Co-opted rabbinical stories! Exclamation points!

It’s like a game of OK Boomer Bingo.

Which is really too bad. This *could* have been a good book; the author just didn’t meet the theological, ecclesiastical, and literary challenge that he gave himself.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.