The Rehnquist Choice: The Untold Story of the Nixon Appointment That Redefined the Supreme Court

by John W. Dean

The explosive, never-before-revealed story of how William Rehnquist became a Supreme Court Justice, told by the man responsible for his candidacy.

Genres: History, Politics, Nonfiction, Law, Biography

352 pages, Hardcover

First published September 26, 2001

About the author

John W. Dean served as White House Counsel for United States President Richard Nixon from July 1970 until April 1973. In this position, he became deeply involved in events leading up to the Watergate burglaries and the subsequent Watergate scandal cover-up. He was referred to as the "master manipulator of the cover-up" by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). He pleaded guilty to a single felony count, in exchange for becoming a key witness for the prosecution. This ultimately resulted in a reduced prison sentence, which he served at Fort Holabird outside Baltimore, Maryland.

Dean is currently an author, columnist, and commentator on contemporary politics, strongly critical of conservatism and the Republican Party, and is a registered Independent who supported the efforts to impeach President George W. Bush.

Reviews

[Evan Moore · Rating 2 out of 5]

While an interesting look at the internal dynamics of choosing Supreme Court Justices in general, and President Nixons in particular, this book suffers a bit from being a bit too reliant on the insertion of parenthesis to fill in thoughts. It breaks the narrative, and makes it difficult to determine what the point of a sentence might be, or what the person quoted is saying (I am aware that there is also an argument for inserting these, as it makes it more understandable). This also feels like a book that you need to read twice, once to know it and another time to check the footnotes

[Lukasz Pruski · Rating 3 out of 5]

"There ought to be a woman judge. Lots of women, and it's economic. I'm not for women, frankly, in any job. I don't want any of them around."
(R.M. Nixon, according to transcript of recorded conversations)

John W. Dean was one of the crucial figures in the Watergate affair of the early 1970s, the affair that ended R.M. Nixon's presidency. Of all the principal actors in the affair he might be the one who contributed the most to exposing the President's knowledge of all machinations. The Rehnquist Choice (2001) is not a book about Watergate, though. Mr. Dean writes here about President Nixon's other contribution to political history of the U.S. - one that that might have had even a more significant impact - the nomination of William Rehnquist to the Supreme Court in 1971. As Mr. Nixon said himself in a TV speech to the nation:

"Presidents come and go, but the Supreme Court - through its decisions - goes on forever."

Mr. Rehnquist eventually became the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the author aptly summarizes the importance of President Nixon's decision:

"The Rehnquist choice [...] has redefined the Supreme Court, making it a politically conservative bastion within our governmental system. Rehnquist's many years of service, and his ability as a legal scholar, have brought about the rewriting of fundamental aspects of the nation's constitutional law."

The book contains extensive excerpts from the transcripts of the infamous "Nixon tapes" that eventually sealed the President's fate and forced his resignation in 1974 - recordings of conversations taped in the Oval Office.

The title of the book is a little misleading since more than half of the book recounts the history of all Nixon's nominations to the Supreme Court. Out of eight seriously considered candidates two were rejected by the Senate, two were deemed unqualified by the American Bar Association, one withdrew himself, and three nominations were successful: justices Blackmun, Powell, and Rehnquist.

The book is rich is historical details and I will focus only on its two main emphases. The author's first central point is that it was in fact he, John W. Dean, who sold the idea that Mr. Rehnquist should become nominated to Supreme Court to people who had significant influence on the President and the selection of nominees. One has to keep in mind that Mr. Dean's narrative may conceivably be biased. I have no way of assessing the veracity of the message: it might be true but neither is it impossible that Mr. Dean aggrandizes his role in history.

The other central idea is that Mr. Rehnquist did not tell the entire truth about his past judicial record during the confirmation hearings and that the truth did not come out because the entire process was conducted in haste. The author's argument is very strong but I am certainly not an expert to take sides. If the message is indeed true, it would make me less happy about the robustness of the confirmation process.

One aspect I do not like is that the distinction between transcripts of Nixon tapes and Mr. Dean's recollections of conversations that had not been taped is not made more explicit. The reader, knowing that most of the dialogues in the book come from tapes, may form an impression that Dean's private conversations are rendered verbatim. But, in fact, the author could have made them all up. I am absolutely not claiming that he did any such thing, I just regret that the distinction is not more clear.

The look behind the curtains of the nomination process, evidenced by conversations caught on tape, is quite revealing. One can really confirm the ugliness of the political process, things like catering to minorities: focusing on whether the candidate is Catholic or Protestant, African American, Italian, Jewish or Polish, and, of course, trying to nominate a woman. Let me quote another passage from President Nixon's rant:

"And she's the best qualified woman but she's not qualified for the Supreme Court. Jesus, that's great. That's great."

We may never know if other presidents tape their private conversations in the White House. If they do, I have no doubts that Mr. Nixon wouldn't be the only one with despicable quotes.

And finally, let me observe how extremely non-partisan the senators were in these times - often voting against the party line on both sides of the party divide. Nothing even remotely similar would be possible in today's polarized political climate.

Three and a half stars.

[Jean · Rating 4 out of 5]

With the release of the Nixon Tapes more books are coming out based on new information revealed in the tapes. This book is one of those books. The book is based on 420 hours of the recently released tapes that cover the 34 days in 1971 when Nixon filled two Supreme Court vacancies. Dean used the Tapes, his own papers from when he was Nixon’s White House Counsel, and documents from the National Archives. I never thought I would be listening to the famous Nixon Tapes.

Apparently Nixon considered 36 candidates to fill the positions vacated by retiring Justices Hugo Black and John Marshall Harlan. Dean states that Nixon’s goal was to slow down integration and move the Court to the right. When Rehnquist was being considered Nixon was told “Rehnquist made his Arizona mentor Barry Goldwater look like a liberal.” I cannot believe that Nixon considered nominating Senator Bird to the Court; he was even a Democrat not a Republican besides being a form KKK member.

Dean reveals the “vetting” process used by the Nixon White House and Justice Department to select nominees to the Court. The book is well written and easy to follow with lots of quotes from the tapes to give reader the feeling they are sitting in the White House alongside Nixon. I read this as an audiobook downloaded from Audible. The book is short at six hours. During Nixon’s Presidency he appointed four men to the Supreme Court: William Rehnquist, Lewis Powell Jr., Harry Blackmum and he appointed Warren E. Burger as Chief Justice. Boyd Gaines does a good job narrating the book.

[James Kingman · Rating 2 out of 5]

This book reads like the strident ramblings of a defensive and bitter old man. It took 40 years for him to come out with this story. Undoubtedly Nixon had some practices that wee would not like, and the fact that every conversation was recorded hurts his reputation. But that is not news. This book at first seem to have a legitimate gripe. It devolves into a back-biting report through the transcripts that any one could read without any insight or useful commentary. If Dean was a player, he certainly is not now.

[John Hively · Rating 2 out of 5]

This was an interesting, if tediously dull, book. But it is important as it gives an insider account of how a corrupt Chief Justice managed to get past the senate judiciary committee while holding views not in harmony with the US constitution.

[Lakin · Rating 3 out of 5]

I love history and law and all of the matters that go into politics; however, for me, this reading was dry. There were so many names and jumping back and forth that it was hard to keep track of what was happening. I liked it, as I learned a lot of things about important political figures, but had this not be a required reading for my political science class, this would have never made its way into my hands.

[Howard · Rating 3 out of 5]

Abridged audiobook streamed from Hoopla Digital. I do not feel compelled to seek out the unabridged edition. Valuable for historians and those interested in the mechanics behind major political decisions.

[Jose Cintron · Rating 5 out of 5]

The book goes into frequently boring details in Nixon’s conversations and exchanges with his staff on the matter of this appointment. Nixon’s pettiness and insecurities, as well as his efforts to gain political mileage from these appointments, come into full view. Nevertheless, this is a valuable historical testimony of a process whose inner workings are rarely publicized. Highly enjoyable and recommended for political junkies and history buffs.

[Betty Bennett · Rating 5 out of 5]

Intriguing look at the Nixon White House. The veneer of a plastic president does not remove the stain of lies Nixon manipulating, espousing values in public then trash talking them behind clothed doors, the Biden racism and misogyny were evident in cursing and tasteless comments. Not a pleasant book to read. But necessary to understand what a slick looking official can hide

[Dan Cotter · Rating 5 out of 5]

Somehow, I missed this excellent book by John Dean, using hundreds of hours of tapes to describe how Rehnquist came to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Excellent book and provides further insights into what I new.

[Dee · Rating 5 out of 5]

It’s a transcript of the Nixon tapes highlighting the process of choosing a Supreme Court Justice. It shows the racism, greed, and fascism associated with the process and exposes its transactional nature.

[Steve Matthews · Rating 5 out of 5]

Terrific book

While not a fan of John Dean, this was a great book! I learned much about the Nixon White House, their manner of operation and the Court itself. I had no idea Mr. Rehnquist was such a pivotal Justice. I recommend this book to anyone interested in the Nixon years.

[Joeman · Rating 3 out of 5]

Very insightful look behind the vail of our supreme court.... Just as "We the People" consider the integrity of our current Chief Justice.....

[Angel · Rating 3 out of 5]

honestly sometimes hard to follow, had to read this for a class & wow was it a dreadful read that did not need to be so long but i get it i guess it’s a book yeah

[Clint · Rating 5 out of 5]

Fascinating story of the selection of William Rehnquist as Supreme Court nominee in 1971 by former White House aide John Dean. Details how many names were bandied about, how close several came to being the nominee and how involved (and yet not involved) President Richard Nixon was in Rehnquist’s final selection. Dean also covers Rehnquist’s likely deception in detailing some negative voting rights activities he might have been involved in during the late 1950s/early 1960s in Arizona.

[morgan · Rating 5 out of 5]

John Dean's best book I think. Even better than Blind Ambition. A lot of information in here about who the contenders were for the supreme court seat which eventually went to Rehnquist. i.e. Senator Howard Baker 'dithered' for a bit on whether he wanted it or not. Dean was White House Counsel at the time, and shares his memories of the process, and his perspective. We know from his testimony in watergate, he has a good memory and is pretty methodical with note taking, so even if his memory is faulty at times, probably a lot of it in the ballpark of near accuracy. He has quite a sense of humor, some very funny stories. It's never boring, quite a well organized book where he stays on topic. Wonderful for the sake of history to have a detailed first person perspective like this from someone who was there.

[Bill Sleeman · Rating 3 out of 5]

The Rehnquist Choice by former White House Counsel John Dean is a quick and engaging history of President Nixon’s decision making process to fill a set of open seats on the Supreme Court of the United States. It is also, I suspect, an attempt at a mea culpa (although not really necessary IMHO) by Dean – but the real message here, at least for young political staffers – would be to keep your mouth shut if you don’t know what you are talking about!

[Tom · Rating 4 out of 5]

While I can only give this 4 stars because I don't have the time to investigate and check Dean's sources and conclusions. Sorry but he is no more trustworthy than his old masters were! That caveat duly posted, this is a nice piece of first person testimony on a fascinating conservative appointment to the Supreme Court. Additionally, it brings back enough scoundrels (Nixon, Mitchell, et al) and racists (Stennis, Eastland, etc) to satisfy any Sixties/Seventies historian.

[Paul · Rating 4 out of 5]

What I liked about this book is that it gave a different perspective of the inner workings of the white house as the president tries to figure out who will take the spot on the nation's highest court. Rehnquist was not Nixon's first or second choice, but Rehnquist became a 30 year veteran of the court and one of its finest, and notorious, leaders.

[Yvonne · Rating 2 out of 5]

The subject is interesting, but the book is really slooooow. It is a play-by-play of how Nixon ends up picking Rehnquist, but that doesn't even happen until the very last chapter -- every other chapter is about the rejects that come before Rehnquist. So as far as the actual "Rehnquist Choice" goes, it is in only the last chapter.