Getting the Gospel Right: A Balanced View of Calvinism and Arminianism

by C. Gordon Olson, Tim LaHaye (Foreword by)

Getting the Gospel A Balanced View of Calvinism and Arminianism (Revised)

Genres: Theology

374 pages, Paperback

First published November 1, 2005

Reviews

[Scott · Rating 5 out of 5]

Finally! A balanced view on an age-old debate. Olson uses clear, logical historically accurate exegetical analysis for interpreting "problem" passages in the Bible. In the end, his "mediate" view of soteriology is most clear and refreshing. He answered many of my questions.

[Jack Edwards · Rating 5 out of 5]

Very well written

[Rick Shrader]

Olson is a graduate of Dallas Theological Seminary and holds a doctorate in Missiology from Trinity International University. This 2005 edition is “an abridged and revised edition of Beyond Calvinism and Arminianism,” 2002. Olson takes on the age-old controversy over Calvinism and Arminianism from a view very similar to Norman Geisler. It is recommended by several well-known teachers and writers including Paige Patterson, Earl Radmacher, James Bjornstad, and Tim LaHaye. Since I am generally in this camp I can identify a lot with Olson’s points. He believes in an unlimited atonement and denies irresistible grace. He places foreknowledge before election in the ordo salutis, or order of God’s salvation decrees. He holds that, “Faith is not in any way meritorious or to be thought of as a work,” and that, “calling is mediate through the Word of God, but that regeneration itself is immediately and diretly, one hundred percent the work of the Spirit” (p. 220).

Though I generally agree with the book, I didn’t like certain minor points about his writing style. Olson makes a big point that he uses an inductive not a deductive method of research. Basically this just means that he considers the context of passages more than a predetermined system of theology (such as Calvinism or Arminianism). In the end, however in my opinion, all conclusions become systematized, or deductive. His research is thorough, but his footnoting is not in consistent style throughout. I thought his chapter on the warning passages in the book of Hebrews was a stretch. He sees these five passages separately referring to three groups of people: genuine believers, false believers, and inquiring believers. But that is not a major issue in the book.

Olson makes eternal security the dividing line between Calvinism and Arminianism and spends much time supporting eternal security. He likes to point out that Calvinists have their own problems with eternal security and perseverance. These issues have always divided believers but for real, even good, reasons. The key is to approach them charitably, which I think Olson does.

link:

[Drew Tenpas]

The Thesis of this book is stated on page 1. that "ANY sinner can be saved by grace only through explicit repentant faith in the finished work of Christ alone." "This means that the gospel is a valid offer for every last human being, available by God's unmerited favor, apart from human performance either before or after conversion..." So far I've only read the first 9 chapters which are on the "Foundation of Salvation truth." However, from what I've read so far, I believe that author has made a strong case for several very important salvation doctrines.

[Danny Bennett · Rating 3 out of 5]

Whew! Getting through this book took a long time for good reasons and bad. This book is tough to get through because the theological concepts are dense and the exegetical work is rigorous. Many of his ideas are great and added to my theological development. I feel I would classify myself as a mediate between the two views. However, as great as Olson's arguments and ideas were, he is a horrible writer. Joseph Dillow's work, Reign of the Servant Kings, touches on many of the same issues but Dillow is an excellent writer so if you can't get through Olson's work, try Dillow's work.

[Sharon · Rating 4 out of 5]

A theological workout for my brain.