Is the Hebrew Bible sexist? or, in the most positive way of reading the stories where women are featured or included, is the Bible at least decidedly androcentrist? And, if so, do the stories told therein have any authority or application for women today? Have they adversely affected the way women view themselves?
Perhaps it is only the male commentators who, down through the ages, have bred into our bones interpretations that show women in the Bible chiefly as helpmates (very much the second sex), as harlots, often as victims and sometimes, though very rarely, as heroes.
Bellis, a Semitic language and Old Testament (OT) scholar at Howard University Divinity School, sets out to explore these issues.
She manages to look at every woman's story in the OT in chronological order, summarize the new and sometimes radical interpretations that feminist and womanist Biblical scholars have given these stories, and then provide some commentary of her own - commenting when she thinks a particular interpretation may not be supported by the facts of the story itself or bringing us back to commonsense when a particular interpretation seems to be too far afield, overly influenced by a particular political point of view. Each section is followed by a series of questions suitable for group discussion, and by an excellent bibliography.
I'd recommend this book to anyone interested in and/or troubled by (furious at?) the way women are depicted in the OT. It's not only that they are depicted poorly but it's also usual that their point of view is simply ignored. Bellis gives us the factual story. She doesn't claim that all the stories can be "redeemed," i.e. made relevant or palatable to our modern sensibilities. Nevertheless it's enlightening and sometimes hopeful to see how various feminist and womanist scholars derive new meanings from these texts. Her book is scholarly enough but not difficult.
Bellis defines for us in her introductory chapter the modern methods of interpretation Biblical scholars use in looking at the stories: literary criticism, culturally cued literary reading, historical inquiry, and so forth. By the end of her book, you may find yourself agreeing more with one method than with the others.