The global powerhouse that is the United States of America is younger even than the British Museum, Guinness and the flushing toilet. In 2026 it will celebrate its 250th birthday. How did this vast land, long inhabited by diverse indigenous cultures, come to be dominated by English speakers? How has it grappled with the stark contradictions between its ideals of liberty and the grim reality of genocide and slavery?
This extraordinary collection of fifty distinct states has weathered immense – and recent – challenges, including a Civil War that was still raging as the first London Underground station opened. How did this melting pot of peoples and ideas not only endure but rise to dominate global politics, commerce, culture and warfare? What insights does this rich history offer about an increasingly divided nation – and the world that moves to its rhythm? Is this the twilight of American supremacy, signalling a shift toward a more introspective nation?
A Short History of America is rich with vivid characters – from arrogant conquistadors and idealistic revolutionaries to imperial presidents – and presents a narrative so astonishing it often feels like fake news. This is a gripping must-read for anyone seeking to make sense of our world today.
Sir Simon David Jenkins, FSA, FRSL is the author of the international bestsellers England’s Thousand Best Churches and England’s Thousand Best Houses, the former editor of The Times and Evening Standard and a columnist for the Guardian. He is chairman of the National Trust.
Refreshing read in times of shifting geopolitical relations. Every once in a while, it is worth investing time in learning about the history of the world’s major players. In the case of Jenkins, he has timed his new short history of the United States (‘From Tea Party to Trump’) rather well. The book teaches us several important lessons. First, the United States has come a very long (and often bloody) way before stepping onto the world stage roughly a century ago. In other words, nothing lasts forever. Second, U.S. administrations have often shown isolationist tendencies, also when it comes to Europe. So, what’s new? Third, since the end of the Cold War, the military-industrial complex has been in constant search of new conflicts. Sounds familiar? Take these three lessons into account, and consider where we find ourselves today. RF
I enjoyed this book very much. It served a purpose as filling in gaps in my knowledge and reminding me of things I’d forgotten as well as making me think. It’s written in an engaging, pacy style and focus is on how (despite the checks and balances afforded by the constitution) the whims of a president can affect the country’s direction. The question of the USA‘s role on the global stage and how much larger / richer nations should actively intervene in foreign affairs is considered and there‘s no easy answer to this. Given the USA‘s 250th and the current state pf geopolitics mean this a timely and valuable read.
It suffers from a lack of nuance, which is to be expected in a short history. Many of the points that Jenkins makes are valid up to a point, whilst others seem very questionable.
Unfortunately there are also a few errors - including that the infamous photo of US citizens fleeing Saigon was at the US Embassy (it was, I believe, a USAID/CIA building) and that Trump deported an American to an Ecuadorian prison, when it was a prison in El Salvador.
Being quite widely read on many of the subjects covered, I feel a lot was missed that would have enhanced a reader's understanding - for instance, that George W. Bush believed that Saddam Hussein must have had WMDs, as he couldn't rationalise Saddam's behaviour if not. These could have been short sentences, so not massively impacting the length of the book. I also feel his part on Theodore Roosevelt was wide of the mark.
I'd recommend for a newcomer with an interest in American history, as it's quite well-written and accessible, but anyone already familiar should avoid and focus on more in-depth, analytical books.
A good read, written in an accessible style. It was ‘put-down-able’, hence the long duration of the read.
Does not assume too much prior knowledge. I learnt something about presidents that I have never studied but who are significant individuals, for example: Nixon. It does what it says it will: provide a ‘short history’.
I found the sections on American society most engaging. Less attention is paid to the ‘counter-culture’ of the sixties in the history books. I’d like to read more about this.
I wonder how in the future the final chapter might be revised… I’m finishing the book now, in the context of Trump’s war on Iran.
Could be improved with more explanation of the ‘college system’. I understand its dominance in elections but this seems crucial, given the current presidency.
Book bought with a gift voucher from a grateful student. I read it alongside others and determined to finish it during the Easter holidays.
As someone who loves American sport, country music and culture, I’ve always been interested in where it all comes from… and for the large part, it’s us!
I already knew bits of that anyway, but learning it in more detail was fascinating.
This is a great read for someone like me who wants to know a history of America without getting into the nitty-gritty of every era in its entirety.
It has given me a new interest in some parts I otherwise wouldn’t have learnt about, and a deeper interest in other parts I knew some about.
It has helped me pin point other books that are more specific on different parts of US history, for which I will find books I can read on those parts.
Истинско облекчение е посред истеричните крайности в наше време да прочетеш нещо толкова трезво и премерено. Вярно, рационалното и обективно мислене не е на мода, но пък Перуника Майска няма амбиции за модна икона, нито дори за модна кокона, така че ако смята, че нещо си струва вниманието, го обсъжда с приятелите си, дори и грам лайкове да не събере:
Picked up at a station bookshop before a long journey. Kept me engaged for the entire 6 hours, and then finished afterwards at home. Nothing really new learned, but it was an engaging read, well written, and a recommendation for anyone who might want an overview of US history in a comfortable and informative style.
Concise but excellent survey of US history. This manages to capture enough detail to aid a broad understanding of US history without getting bogged down. Great introduction to the topic and makes me want to investigate certain events in more detail.
Having read the author’s previous short histories I was looking forward to reading this , and I was not disappointed. An excellent short history of America, covering all the main events, very good.
Има си известна разлика между „Кратка история на Европа“ на Саймън Дженкинс, която излезе на български през 2019 г., след като я открих почти случайно в забутано каре на един каталог, и „Кратка история на Америка“, която се появи наскоро – тъкмо преди честванията за 250-годишнината от обявяването на независимостта на САЩ (една от многото държави по земното кълбо, която чества като национален празник измъкването си от хватката на Великобритания). Ако тази за Европа се свеждаше само до гръбнак от основни събития поради нужда да се обеме цели хилядолетия сложна и претрупана със събития история, то тази за Америка дава възможност както да се разкаже вкратце всичко важно от историческа гледна точка, така и да се поразсъждава какво точно обединява постоянно нарастващия брой щати, какво (преимуществено) ги разделя, как изкуството на компромиса е това, което от самото начало дава живот на това причудливо държавно образувание, и за сложните течения и противоборства в американската политика, които водят до съвременното жестоко разделение с всички знайни последствия. В крайна сметка историята на Америка е един постоянен конфликт между идеалите, които си вменява и претендира да следва, и реалността, която винаги е по-кървава и омърсена.
“If you’re going to be boring, at least be brief” could be Jenkin’s motto. At its best, it’s a dry, thinly researched summary of key events in American history; at its worst it’s misleading and skewed. Jenkins struggles to really understand the country and there’s a vein of English superciliousness throughout - Jenkins seems to think if America could just adopt BBC socialism and give up their big hats and silly guns, America could finally earn his respect.