I'm going to preface this with, I am a progressive individual, fully support all rights to LGBTQ people, and work for a lgbtq nonprofit. Nothing in this review is because I am homophobic or have deep seeded hatred. I simply can't stand the writing and presentation of this book.
To start, This is not an unbiased look at LGBT history in the US. It is not a "make your own judgement" book. No, it's pretty clear that the bias here is that those lgbtq people are innocent victims and if you weren't with them, you are an enemy. The LGBTQ community is put on a pedestal in this book and nothing can shatter the author's views that this group has been oppressed for millennium and they are the victims of the white man. Or that the LGBTQ community did nothing wrong and were innocent victims. An exploration into the reasons for the fear and anger towards gays would have provided a better, well rounded understanding of the past and place some context for the anger of the lgbtq community.
The first chapter was all about proving there were homosexuals since the Romans. No context about how they were received, or viewed, just "See! We existed a long time ago!" How'd we go from openly gay Greeks to persecuted gays at Plymouth? No mention of the culture or reasons for the persecution. Pohlen states, "Whitman... He was certainly gay." And a few lines later admits, "Whitman never publicly admitted that he he was gay." No one cares if Whitman was gay, what we do care about is the world he lived in as a closeted gay man and why he was in the closet. Again, give some context!
There are gross generalization of many group in this book. It was ridiculous. It feels as if you can feel Pohlen's lifelong frustration of perhaps his own persecution and biases coming through. White, gay men, are not given stereotypes, but every other group is. For example, Pohlen makes the assumption that every woman who fought in the Civil War was transgender. Stop it.
This is also unnessary descriptors used for people that paint them in ways they don't need to be. In referring to the Stonewall Riots he writes, "a "butch" lesbian who the police roughed up...". Why is "butch" needed? She could have been "a lesbian" with nothing else needed. He doesn't describe men as "flowery" so stop doing that to the female players
Later, he writes, "it wasn't just crackpots like Lyndon LaRouche...". How can I take this seriously if the term "crackpot" is used as a legit was to describe someone. Again, this person was straight, and therefore an enemy, so this language can be used.
And the use of italics! This is history, I dont need personal commentary by Pohlen on how I should feel. The italics aren't consistent and add unnecessary emphasis only on the things that straight people were doing to oppress lgbt's.
I wanted to read this book because I genuinely wanted an easy to read book covering the history of LGBTQ in America. Instead, I got a biased novel on the oppression of homosexuals and how awful people are. Pohlen should have kept his personal views to himself and not interject what he feels into the writing. This is not a book for children who are looking for an entry to understanding lgbtq history, but for adults who have critical thinking skills to see the holes in writing.
Ps- the activities are a joke and the book layout is awful to try to read.