A lot of what we know and don't know about Mozart the person is largely based on his legacy and what people assumed of him after his lifetime as accounts of his life during his lifetime aren't reliable. Even his "middle" name Amadeus, was apparently only a stage nickname that only HE would use in jest in letters but nowhere of it written that that is his name. From some popular culture and also from his wife's account, he was a simpleton but that doesn't seem to match all the evidence of his life. His God like status, literally, isn't quite as undeniable either as Mozart during his lifetime was not liked by all like he likely was after his life. Many including monarchs have criticised his work to be too long and far too complicated for the general public to understand and some have even described it for being vulgar for its sexual nature. A lot of these assumptions about Mozart are made to rationalise his immense skill and creativity residuals at a young age. You make him to a freak, a God or witchcraft like the magic ring on his hand. When trying to explain his abilities, you must bring up his important relationship with his controlling father. Based on the traditional norms in family and career, his father was rather rebellious to his family and eventually pursued music against his families wishes. His only son(besides his eldest daughter) Wolfgang was his main life goal. Wolfgang was pretty much homeschooled and had his father as his primary tutor. At the age of 5 already showing some composing abilities and promise, Leopold took his children on a long and epic European tour which changed Mozart's life from prospect to composer. This tour must have deeply affected his psychology at such a young age. This sickly and small boy always deeply desired the affection and approval of his strict father pushing himself to work harder. But his father also needed his son as he used his son as a crutch for his own unsuccessful career. Interestingly enough, one of Mozart's biggest influences at an early stage in his life bedsides his father was Johann Cristian Bach, one of the many sons of the great J. Sebastian Bach. Although he is short of forgotten in history, unlike his father, J.C still a great composer at the time and was a sort of friend or mentor to Mozart besides the clear age difference and his blending of Italian melody and German rhythm was something that became also characteristic of his work. In different countries, the expectations and reception towards Mozart was different so he was challenged accordingly, particularly in Italy, which his father hated. His father's tight grip on how Mozart would write his music would become key into how Mozart would later rebel against him and alsocompose without him. Some particularly interesting details were how the numbering of symphonies were occasionally wrong. As a young adult his stardom didn't necessarily carry through and he has some difficulties with patron dying/changing and having to work again in music instead of composing. Mozart in his early twenties traveled had some major changes in his life. He traveled to Paris with this mother and had a difficulty finding any job, likely because he didn't want to. He fell in love for the first time too which plays a part in his sexual nature that clearly comes across in his music. This also affected his relationship with his father. His mother died quickly of some disease and things got even worse with his father, blaming him for her death and claiming he owed him money. Eventually when Mozart did marry Constansa, his father did disinherited Mozart and their relationship was never the same again. Mozart likely hated his father especially in the years following this as everything that was withheld from him up to then, was drastically overturned after. Mozart for one of his big breaks in Munich in an serious Opera. By his late twenties, Mozart was becoming a musical superstar in Vienna. He was rich and spent his money well. Had many dogs and a bird, likely a gambler too. I really liked how Greenberg as a lot of personal insights on Mozart like even his obsession on saying "lick my ass" which is such a crass German saying. Lecture tracks about how he was friends and deeply admitted the great Heiden, and the great works that came forth from that. As a musician himself, Greenberg picks up on details such as a distinguishing fracture of Mozart's mature music was using the brass instruments as their own separate element as opposed to just reinforcing the string instruments. By now it is very clear that Mozart unlike what pop culture has portrayed him as, was very hard working and a intelligent man. Not a good given talent to a bumbling idiot that never grew up. A few personal details that were divulged in his let's that is rather impressive though we're the absurd work hours in the early morning or late night he composed for. And by composed I mean he simply copied down what was already in his head. The fact that Mozart has a fantastic eat for music and could improvise well and drafted very little of his music was indeed something very impressive. One account of him performing had him only having time to write down the music for the violin and he would play his part off the top of his head. Finally when his father died, Mozart did not interior anything and was not a sad man at all and wrote a piece to spite the memory of his father.
Mozart in his late twenties and early thirties was in the prime of his career in terms of success (not his finances) and was producing some of his most important operas. He traveled a lot and many argue that Mozart would have reached greater success had he stayed in Prague. I actually really enjoyed how Greenberg explains to people like me who are not as familiar with Mozart's music, what to look out for and what we're some of the stand out features of the operas. There is a tremendous amount of internal politics involved with the creation of these works in terms of the writers and performers and their egos. Besides Mozart's abysmal finances, constantly needing loans and taking jobs that would even require him to give over the credit of his work to other people (like his last piece, the Requiem), his marriage was also not great as being the superstar that he was in theatre and music, the man was a very promiscuous. Well finally in the last lecture, it deals with the mysterious case of his death. There are endless conspiracy theories behind trying to explain it but there is little to no evidence behind any of them, including the one by Salieri himself decades later as a old man after slitting his own throat, saying that he was the one poisoning Mozart. This is where the Hollywood movie Amadeus is based on. What likely did happen was that it was an accumulation of factors. First of and most importantly, Mozart was for pretty much most his life a sickly man and likely had rheumatoid fever which was common at the time, he was likely overworked with very poor sleeping patterns, according to his letters, he was likely depressed and lastly, it's documented that bloodletting was performed on his death which would have worsened everything. Since he was not upper class at the time, Mozart was buried in a common grave along with many others and therefore had no official testing place. Many biographies came in years after his death which spread the majority of the rumours, including one from his wife which she made a lot of money from.
The man had a incredibly short life and even shorter career but in that span, produced a rather large amount of music that had a deep impact at the time and even deeper after his death with his godlike legacy.