What do you think?
Rate this book
An Argument: Between Mr. Skeptic and Mr. Christian
THE ARGUMENT HAS BEGUN! Join Mr. Skeptic and Mr. Christian as they enjoy a breakfast filled with eggs, coffee, and contentious debate. Sit at the table as they argue over the Trinity, the Bible, Evolution, and much more! Do you enjoy a good argument? Do you get a thrill out of having your blood pressure raised? Welcome to Tuesday morning breakfast with Clyde Christian and Archibald Skeptic.
79 pages, Kindle Edition
First published March 21, 2015
2 people are currently reading
1 person want to read
About the author
Stephen Baker
109 books7 followersLibrarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name. See this thread for more information.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
January 19, 2017
Strawman applications accepted here
As a person that studies religious texts in academia I picked this book to break the doldrum of dense translations from days gone by. If you're looking for a theologically incoherent book that completely misunderstands the scientific process, terminology, and definitions.... this book is for you.
Despite its citations, the contents of this publication are quite lacking in any intellectual honesty or rigor.
As a person that studies religious texts in academia I picked this book to break the doldrum of dense translations from days gone by. If you're looking for a theologically incoherent book that completely misunderstands the scientific process, terminology, and definitions.... this book is for you.
Despite its citations, the contents of this publication are quite lacking in any intellectual honesty or rigor.
December 16, 2015
Short story form apologetic
This was a short quick read. A debate between a skeptic and a Christian. While I think some of the arguments could be better (his explanation of the trinity used the modalist explanation of three forms of water which does not adequately explain the trinity) his arguments and his style were believable and readable. Recommended
This was a short quick read. A debate between a skeptic and a Christian. While I think some of the arguments could be better (his explanation of the trinity used the modalist explanation of three forms of water which does not adequately explain the trinity) his arguments and his style were believable and readable. Recommended
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews