What do you think?
Rate this book
The Quincunx Cycle #2
Fifteen Dogs
Winner of the 2015 Scotiabank Giller Prize
Finalist for the 2015 Toronto Book Awards
Winner of the 2015 Rogers Writers' Trust Fiction Prize
— I wonder, said Hermes, what it would be like if animals had human intelligence.
— I'll wager a year's servitude, answered Apollo, that animals – any animal you like – would be even more unhappy than humans are, if they were given human intelligence.
And so it begins: a bet between the gods Hermes and Apollo leads them to grant human consciousness and language to a group of dogs overnighting at a Toronto veterinary clinic. Suddenly capable of more complex thought, the pack is torn between those who resist the new ways of thinking, preferring the old 'dog' ways, and those who embrace the change. The gods watch from above as the dogs venture into their newly unfamiliar world, as they become divided among themselves, as each struggles with new thoughts and feelings. Wily Benjy moves from home to home, Prince becomes a poet, and Majnoun forges a relationship with a kind couple that stops even the Fates in their tracks.
André Alexis's contemporary take on the apologue offers an utterly compelling and affecting look at the beauty and perils of human consciousness. By turns meditative and devastating, charming and strange, Fifteen Dogs shows you can teach an old genre new tricks.
André Alexis was born in Trinidad and grew up in Canada. His debut novel, Childhood, won the Books in Canada First Novel Award, the Trillium Book Award, and was shortlisted for the Giller Prize and the Writers' Trust Fiction Prize. His other previous books include Asylum, Beauty and Sadness, Ingrid & the Wolf and, most recently, Pastoral, which was also nominated for the Rogers Writers' Trust Fiction Prize and was named a Globe and Mail Top 100 book of 2014.
"[Alexis] devises an inventive romp through the nature of humanity in this beautiful, entertaining read … A clever exploration of our essence, communication, and how our societies are organized." – Kirkus Reviews
"This might be the best set-up of the spring." – The Globe & Mail
"André Alexis has established himself as one of our preeminent voices." – Toronto Star
Finalist for the 2015 Toronto Book Awards
Winner of the 2015 Rogers Writers' Trust Fiction Prize
— I wonder, said Hermes, what it would be like if animals had human intelligence.
— I'll wager a year's servitude, answered Apollo, that animals – any animal you like – would be even more unhappy than humans are, if they were given human intelligence.
And so it begins: a bet between the gods Hermes and Apollo leads them to grant human consciousness and language to a group of dogs overnighting at a Toronto veterinary clinic. Suddenly capable of more complex thought, the pack is torn between those who resist the new ways of thinking, preferring the old 'dog' ways, and those who embrace the change. The gods watch from above as the dogs venture into their newly unfamiliar world, as they become divided among themselves, as each struggles with new thoughts and feelings. Wily Benjy moves from home to home, Prince becomes a poet, and Majnoun forges a relationship with a kind couple that stops even the Fates in their tracks.
André Alexis's contemporary take on the apologue offers an utterly compelling and affecting look at the beauty and perils of human consciousness. By turns meditative and devastating, charming and strange, Fifteen Dogs shows you can teach an old genre new tricks.
André Alexis was born in Trinidad and grew up in Canada. His debut novel, Childhood, won the Books in Canada First Novel Award, the Trillium Book Award, and was shortlisted for the Giller Prize and the Writers' Trust Fiction Prize. His other previous books include Asylum, Beauty and Sadness, Ingrid & the Wolf and, most recently, Pastoral, which was also nominated for the Rogers Writers' Trust Fiction Prize and was named a Globe and Mail Top 100 book of 2014.
"[Alexis] devises an inventive romp through the nature of humanity in this beautiful, entertaining read … A clever exploration of our essence, communication, and how our societies are organized." – Kirkus Reviews
"This might be the best set-up of the spring." – The Globe & Mail
"André Alexis has established himself as one of our preeminent voices." – Toronto Star
162 pages, Kindle Edition
First published March 23, 2015
1029 people are currently reading
21556 people want to read
About the author
André Alexis
21 books618 followersAndré Alexis was born in Trinidad and grew up in Canada. His most recent novel, Fifteen Dogs, won the 2015 Scotiabank Giller Prize and the Rogers Writers' Trust Fiction Prize. His debut novel, Childhood, won the Books in Canada First Novel Award, the Trillium Book Award, and was shortlisted for the Giller Prize and the Writers' Trust Fiction Prize. His other books include Pastoral (nominated for the Rogers Writers' Trust Fiction Prize), Asylum, Beauty and Sadness, Ingrid & the Wolf, Despair and Other Stories of Ottawa and Lambton, Kent and Other Vistas: A Play.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 3,545 reviews
November 12, 2015
Woof.
Woof woof wruf wuf.
Woof woof.
Grrrr.
Wruf wuf.
Whimper.
Goddamn it. Fuck you, Apollo!
Woof wuf.
Wuf.
sobs uncontrollably
Translation to follow once I stop crying.
P.S. Wrrruuff woof Giller Prize wuf.
Woof woof wruf wuf.
Woof woof.
Grrrr.
Wruf wuf.
Whimper.
Goddamn it. Fuck you, Apollo!
Woof wuf.
Wuf.
sobs uncontrollably
Translation to follow once I stop crying.
P.S. Wrrruuff woof Giller Prize wuf.
February 16, 2016
Edited: my first review was harsh. And although I stand by my overall evaluation, I don't really want to slam this little book, a Giller prize winner - and recognize that I am decidedly in the minority on it.
----------------------------
This book was disappointing. It failed for me in three main ways:
1) The authorial voice left me uninspired - I found it monotonous and entirely lacking in humour (for a book that seemed tailor-made to be chockablock with whimsy or dark comedy or both). I found that the most dramatic moments were telegraphed a mile in advance and then they were quickly over. I was never fully engaged. In fact, I was often bored.
2) The author doesn't seem to know dogs at all. He seemed to be falling back on the idea of dogs as pack animals who exist entirely on a dominance-submissiveness continuum; a theory long since discredited in doggie circles as a superficial understanding of the complexity of dogs' emotional, social, and behavioural repertoires.
I've read a lot of non-fiction about dogs, and so I pay a lot of attention to how dogs are portrayed and how they are used as devices in literature. Don't get me wrong, I didn't want this book to do a good job on doggie psychology; but I definitely wanted it - and needed it - to do a good job on what that psychology would be like when infused with human consciousness. This was the great potential of the central conceit, but it wasn't done convincingly.
I was looking for anthropomorphism of a specific sort here: not the manipulative kind, but the compelling, thought-experimental kind. There were only small glimmers of it at the end with Majmoun, which was too late and too expositional.
Without this, I had no connection to the dogs. No emotional investment in them. No interest in their characters or their lives and therefore
I don't think that this was the narrative arc Mr. Alexis was seeking to create, but it was my experience reading.
3) As a result of these two factors, the central question - to explore whether human consciousness and language (as a reflection of that consciousness) brings joy or misery - fell flat. What I was hoping would be an original, creative approach to it (i.e., giving the titular 15 dogs human consciousness and language and seeing what happened) felt muddled, under-explored, off-point, and unfulfilling.
I did love that
Oh, and:
Sorry Mr. Alexis and Giller peeps: not this one, not for me.
----------------------------
This book was disappointing. It failed for me in three main ways:
1) The authorial voice left me uninspired - I found it monotonous and entirely lacking in humour (for a book that seemed tailor-made to be chockablock with whimsy or dark comedy or both). I found that the most dramatic moments were telegraphed a mile in advance and then they were quickly over. I was never fully engaged. In fact, I was often bored.
2) The author doesn't seem to know dogs at all. He seemed to be falling back on the idea of dogs as pack animals who exist entirely on a dominance-submissiveness continuum; a theory long since discredited in doggie circles as a superficial understanding of the complexity of dogs' emotional, social, and behavioural repertoires.
I've read a lot of non-fiction about dogs, and so I pay a lot of attention to how dogs are portrayed and how they are used as devices in literature. Don't get me wrong, I didn't want this book to do a good job on doggie psychology; but I definitely wanted it - and needed it - to do a good job on what that psychology would be like when infused with human consciousness. This was the great potential of the central conceit, but it wasn't done convincingly.
I was looking for anthropomorphism of a specific sort here: not the manipulative kind, but the compelling, thought-experimental kind. There were only small glimmers of it at the end with Majmoun, which was too late and too expositional.
Without this, I had no connection to the dogs. No emotional investment in them. No interest in their characters or their lives and therefore
I don't think that this was the narrative arc Mr. Alexis was seeking to create, but it was my experience reading.
3) As a result of these two factors, the central question - to explore whether human consciousness and language (as a reflection of that consciousness) brings joy or misery - fell flat. What I was hoping would be an original, creative approach to it (i.e., giving the titular 15 dogs human consciousness and language and seeing what happened) felt muddled, under-explored, off-point, and unfulfilling.
I did love that
Oh, and:
Sorry Mr. Alexis and Giller peeps: not this one, not for me.
January 16, 2016
A doggone clever and moving book
If animals were granted human intelligence, would they die happier or unhappier? That’s the intriguing question at the heart of André Alexis’s imaginative novel, the most recent winner of Canada’s prestigious Giller Prize.
The gods Apollo and Hermes, dressed like hipsters and drinking Sleemans, are considering this one night at a Toronto bar. Apollo says animals with human intelligence would die even more unhappily than they would otherwise; he’s willing to bet a year’s servitude on that. Hermes agrees, and says that if just one animal dies happy, he’ll win.
Since they’re passing a veterinary clinic when discussing the wager, they decide to bestow human consciousness on the 15 dogs left there overnight. The remainder of the book explores what happens to those canines, from their breakout (several figure out how to release themselves from their cages) to their deaths, some violent, others peaceful.
The result is equal parts survival story, socio-political parable and Philosophy 200 course on what it means to be human. Think Watership Down or Animal Farm as told by the gods. The dogs (Hmm… “dog” is “god” spelled backwards, right?) form a hierarchy, deceive one another, fight, kill, split off into factions… and then there’s the matter of who gets to hump whom.
Alexis, a poet and fiction writer, has great fun with the premise, especially around the idea of language. One of the dogs becomes a poet, which enchants some and angers others. A couple of them learn how to speak English and interact with humans.
And this is a very olfactory book. There’s a heightened attention to smells, for obvious reasons.
There’s also a lot of literary humour. When Majnoun, a clever black Poodle, is rescued by a couple of well-read types, the humans discuss what to call him:
Lest you get confused about the characters, there’s a helpful “dramatis canes” at the beginning which tells you each dog’s name and breed. And two beautiful maps show you the areas in the city where the canines cavort.
Among other things, this is a wonderful Toronto novel, beginning in a familiar local watering hole (the Wheat Sheaf Tavern) and travelling all over the city, from High Park and Bloor West and over to the Beach.
It’ll make you think about group dynamics, love and what separates us from animals. And it’ll make you pay a bit more attention next time you pass a crowded dog park. Also: be sure to read the author’s note at the end. Just as dogs hear certain noises we can’t, there are surprises hidden in the text for you to, er, sniff out.
If animals were granted human intelligence, would they die happier or unhappier? That’s the intriguing question at the heart of André Alexis’s imaginative novel, the most recent winner of Canada’s prestigious Giller Prize.
The gods Apollo and Hermes, dressed like hipsters and drinking Sleemans, are considering this one night at a Toronto bar. Apollo says animals with human intelligence would die even more unhappily than they would otherwise; he’s willing to bet a year’s servitude on that. Hermes agrees, and says that if just one animal dies happy, he’ll win.
Since they’re passing a veterinary clinic when discussing the wager, they decide to bestow human consciousness on the 15 dogs left there overnight. The remainder of the book explores what happens to those canines, from their breakout (several figure out how to release themselves from their cages) to their deaths, some violent, others peaceful.
The result is equal parts survival story, socio-political parable and Philosophy 200 course on what it means to be human. Think Watership Down or Animal Farm as told by the gods. The dogs (Hmm… “dog” is “god” spelled backwards, right?) form a hierarchy, deceive one another, fight, kill, split off into factions… and then there’s the matter of who gets to hump whom.
Alexis, a poet and fiction writer, has great fun with the premise, especially around the idea of language. One of the dogs becomes a poet, which enchants some and angers others. A couple of them learn how to speak English and interact with humans.
And this is a very olfactory book. There’s a heightened attention to smells, for obvious reasons.
There’s also a lot of literary humour. When Majnoun, a clever black Poodle, is rescued by a couple of well-read types, the humans discuss what to call him:
- Why don’t you name him?
- You think we should keep him?
- Why not? Once he gets better he can keep you company during the day.
- Okay. Why don’t we call him Lord Jim?
- You want to name him after the world’s most boring book?
- If I wanted to do that, I’d call him Golden Bowl.
Lest you get confused about the characters, there’s a helpful “dramatis canes” at the beginning which tells you each dog’s name and breed. And two beautiful maps show you the areas in the city where the canines cavort.
Among other things, this is a wonderful Toronto novel, beginning in a familiar local watering hole (the Wheat Sheaf Tavern) and travelling all over the city, from High Park and Bloor West and over to the Beach.
It’ll make you think about group dynamics, love and what separates us from animals. And it’ll make you pay a bit more attention next time you pass a crowded dog park. Also: be sure to read the author’s note at the end. Just as dogs hear certain noises we can’t, there are surprises hidden in the text for you to, er, sniff out.
December 16, 2015
If George Orwell decided to write his allegorical Animal Farm in 2015 instead of 1945, he might have come up with something like Fifteen Dogs.
On second thought, scratch that. I don’t think anyone – not George Orwell, not Paul Auster with Timbuktu, not Jack London with Call of the Wild – could ever come up with something quite this sui generis although they’ve all done some darn good writing of their own.
Fifteen Dogs is, to put it quite simply, remarkable. The premise is quirky: Zeus’s two sons, Apollo and Hermes, come up with an extraordinary wager: they will instill select animals with human intelligence and communication skills. If, at their life’s end, any of the animals is happier than he or she might have been, Hermes is the victor, if, however, human intelligence leads to more misery than contentment, Apollo will prevail. It is decided that the fortuitous fifteen will be 15 canine patients of a nearby veterinary clinic.
At first, there’s a lot of dogs to keep straight (fortunately, the author helpfully provides a cast of characters) but eventually, the action focuses on just a few: Majnoun, a black poodle…Benjy the Beagle…and most compellingly, Prince, an amicable mutt who is also a poet. Here are some musings from Majnoun as he tries to decipher the state of being human: “What would it be like, for instance, to be unable to distinguish the smell of snow in winter from the smell of snow in early spring? What kind of world was it in which one could not, blindfolded, distinguish the great range in the taste of water or smell when a female was in heat. To be so limited? Inconceivable.”
This book is philosophical in the best of senses, dealing with concepts of individual freedom vs. pack conformity, the old ways vs. the new ways, domination vs. submission, tortured knowledge vs. mindless happiness, and more. The questions at the crux of the book are some of the most important of all time: What does it mean to be alive – to love, to think, to suffer, to feel, to communicate, to question? Where do we all – canine and human – fit into the world and when does our dedication to “who we are” rise to being unique and noble? What happens when we become strangers to our own kind…and to our very nature?
Andre Alexis weaves in a fair amount of subtle, yet laugh-out-loud humor as he inhabits the dogs’ perspectives. Yet his fifteen canines are essentially noble creatures, and he never plays a scene strictly for laughs. This is really a wonderful book. You don’t have to be a dog-lover to love it but for those of us who are, special treats are waiting.
On second thought, scratch that. I don’t think anyone – not George Orwell, not Paul Auster with Timbuktu, not Jack London with Call of the Wild – could ever come up with something quite this sui generis although they’ve all done some darn good writing of their own.
Fifteen Dogs is, to put it quite simply, remarkable. The premise is quirky: Zeus’s two sons, Apollo and Hermes, come up with an extraordinary wager: they will instill select animals with human intelligence and communication skills. If, at their life’s end, any of the animals is happier than he or she might have been, Hermes is the victor, if, however, human intelligence leads to more misery than contentment, Apollo will prevail. It is decided that the fortuitous fifteen will be 15 canine patients of a nearby veterinary clinic.
At first, there’s a lot of dogs to keep straight (fortunately, the author helpfully provides a cast of characters) but eventually, the action focuses on just a few: Majnoun, a black poodle…Benjy the Beagle…and most compellingly, Prince, an amicable mutt who is also a poet. Here are some musings from Majnoun as he tries to decipher the state of being human: “What would it be like, for instance, to be unable to distinguish the smell of snow in winter from the smell of snow in early spring? What kind of world was it in which one could not, blindfolded, distinguish the great range in the taste of water or smell when a female was in heat. To be so limited? Inconceivable.”
This book is philosophical in the best of senses, dealing with concepts of individual freedom vs. pack conformity, the old ways vs. the new ways, domination vs. submission, tortured knowledge vs. mindless happiness, and more. The questions at the crux of the book are some of the most important of all time: What does it mean to be alive – to love, to think, to suffer, to feel, to communicate, to question? Where do we all – canine and human – fit into the world and when does our dedication to “who we are” rise to being unique and noble? What happens when we become strangers to our own kind…and to our very nature?
Andre Alexis weaves in a fair amount of subtle, yet laugh-out-loud humor as he inhabits the dogs’ perspectives. Yet his fifteen canines are essentially noble creatures, and he never plays a scene strictly for laughs. This is really a wonderful book. You don’t have to be a dog-lover to love it but for those of us who are, special treats are waiting.
October 31, 2022
It felt like I was under a magical spell to read this novel about a pack of dogs who were granted the power of human speech and thought. The gods Apollo and Hermes made a bet on whether the fifteen dogs would end up their lifes as happy or miserable creatures. Having human thoughts and feelings proved to be mostly unfortunate, if not dangerous and bewildering for the dogs. Only a few dogs experienced friendships with humans and developed an appreciation of beauty. The majority of the dogs preferred to violently oppose to it, but realised at the same time that they could rationally made that decision which, in itself, was not really doggie-like behaviour.
Allow me to quote a few poems of the poetical dog Prince who had the misfortune to realise that his poems would be lost forever upon his demise, as he was the only dog in history who ever wrote and recited poems.
"The lake comes to the fringe
While lights go up around the bay.
Somewhere near, cow flesh is singed.
Smoke floats above the walkway.
I've eaten green that comes up black,
Risen cold from torrid mud.
I've licked my paws and tasted blood.
What is this world of busy lies?
Some urban genie feeding food to flies!"
Prince's last poem:
"What is the name of he who comes
With eyes closed and fingers black,
The one who draws the curtains back
When dawn has come?
'Agha Thanatos' or just plain 'Death'?
When will I know which is right?"
I thought those poems of Prince were wonderful!
It is certainly very revealing to have humans watched and commented upon from the point of view of dogs! Andre Alexis wrote an extraordinary and also touching tale.
Thanks to Roger Brunyate for pointing out this book to me!
Just a P.S.: you don't have to be a dog lover to appreciate this novel!
Allow me to quote a few poems of the poetical dog Prince who had the misfortune to realise that his poems would be lost forever upon his demise, as he was the only dog in history who ever wrote and recited poems.
"The lake comes to the fringe
While lights go up around the bay.
Somewhere near, cow flesh is singed.
Smoke floats above the walkway.
I've eaten green that comes up black,
Risen cold from torrid mud.
I've licked my paws and tasted blood.
What is this world of busy lies?
Some urban genie feeding food to flies!"
Prince's last poem:
"What is the name of he who comes
With eyes closed and fingers black,
The one who draws the curtains back
When dawn has come?
'Agha Thanatos' or just plain 'Death'?
When will I know which is right?"
I thought those poems of Prince were wonderful!
It is certainly very revealing to have humans watched and commented upon from the point of view of dogs! Andre Alexis wrote an extraordinary and also touching tale.
Thanks to Roger Brunyate for pointing out this book to me!
Just a P.S.: you don't have to be a dog lover to appreciate this novel!
September 30, 2025
pupper doggo fur baby
March 24, 2017
Not sure what to say about this book. It did impact me deeply, though probably not for the same reasons the author intended. This was a mostly dark and bleak look at humanity. To be honest, I found it quite upsetting.
The premise of the book (a bet between gods whether 15 dogs, gifted with human consciousness, would die happy) meant seeing each dog through to it’s death. I generally don’t like stories, whether they be books, tv shows or movies, that take us on the full journey to death. It nudges all of my unresolved feelings over mortality and leaves me feeling anxious. Add to this the fact that these fifteen dogs did not have great lives and I just felt somewhat sick while reading, mixed in amongst vast amounts of crying.
This was well written and thought provoking, but I can’t help but feel a little resentful for these dark themes and images that have pierced my happy bubble.
The premise of the book (a bet between gods whether 15 dogs, gifted with human consciousness, would die happy) meant seeing each dog through to it’s death. I generally don’t like stories, whether they be books, tv shows or movies, that take us on the full journey to death. It nudges all of my unresolved feelings over mortality and leaves me feeling anxious. Add to this the fact that these fifteen dogs did not have great lives and I just felt somewhat sick while reading, mixed in amongst vast amounts of crying.
This was well written and thought provoking, but I can’t help but feel a little resentful for these dark themes and images that have pierced my happy bubble.
March 31, 2017
[4.5 Stars]
Second Book of Alexis' Quincunx
CANADA READS 2017 WINNER: CONGRATS TO ANDRÉ ALEXIS!
In 2000, the Baha Men famously asked, “Who let the dogs out?” Little did they know that it would be over a decade before Andre Alexis would answer that question in his Giller Prize-winning novel Fifteen Dogs.
Alright, alright, Fifteen Dogs has nothing to do with that significant piece of musical culture. The unique, heartfelt, and surprisingly philosophical Fifteen Dogs is a beautiful novel, through and through. The premise is as follows: Hermes and Apollo are having a discussion over a few pints in a Toronto bar when a wager is suggested. The gods will grant fifteen dogs human intelligence and wager on the unlikely event that one of the dogs dies happy. It is then that the reader meets the titular fifteen dogs as they come into consciousness. Despite a seemingly immense cast for a novel under 200 pages, many of the dogs meet untimely ends early in the novel and a few hounds rise to be the book’s leads. The dogs’ perspectives in the novel are revelatory. These are not just dogs that can think like humans, they struggle with their canine nature amidst these newfound mental capabilities.
Though the plot may seem outlandish and slightly juvenile, the novel’s aspirations are lofty. Alexis grapples with the very questions that have plagued humanity for all of our existence (source pending): what does it mean to be human? What is love? Would we find faith without being led to it? These topics and many others are covered in believable and realistic passages as the dogs each decide on different paths in their lives. Of particular note is the humor and realism that Alexis creates as the dogs puzzle out the behavior of humans. These scenes are equal measures hilarious for the dogs’ misinterpretation of human activities and profound as the dogs come to grips that they are similar but separate from the rest of society.
I can’t honestly think of a book I’ve read that is quite like Fifteen Dogs. Alexis’ writing is confident, the characters are believable, and his situations naturalistic. The book is filled with wit, and the unique perspective of the dogs provides a reading experience that is quite unlike anything else I’ve encountered. What’s more, as far as award-winning literature goes, Fifteen Dogs is not excessively challenging, but highly rewarding. If you’re embroiled in a heavy work schedule or a daunting academic semester, Fifteen Dogs would make a fine choice.
*Update February 2017: I've decided to pass on most of this year's Canada Reads selections after being disappointed with the 2016 selections and having lots of reading on my plate. With that said, and having read none of the other selections, I'd recommend spending time with this one!
Second Book of Alexis' Quincunx
CANADA READS 2017 WINNER: CONGRATS TO ANDRÉ ALEXIS!
In 2000, the Baha Men famously asked, “Who let the dogs out?” Little did they know that it would be over a decade before Andre Alexis would answer that question in his Giller Prize-winning novel Fifteen Dogs.
Alright, alright, Fifteen Dogs has nothing to do with that significant piece of musical culture. The unique, heartfelt, and surprisingly philosophical Fifteen Dogs is a beautiful novel, through and through. The premise is as follows: Hermes and Apollo are having a discussion over a few pints in a Toronto bar when a wager is suggested. The gods will grant fifteen dogs human intelligence and wager on the unlikely event that one of the dogs dies happy. It is then that the reader meets the titular fifteen dogs as they come into consciousness. Despite a seemingly immense cast for a novel under 200 pages, many of the dogs meet untimely ends early in the novel and a few hounds rise to be the book’s leads. The dogs’ perspectives in the novel are revelatory. These are not just dogs that can think like humans, they struggle with their canine nature amidst these newfound mental capabilities.
Though the plot may seem outlandish and slightly juvenile, the novel’s aspirations are lofty. Alexis grapples with the very questions that have plagued humanity for all of our existence (source pending): what does it mean to be human? What is love? Would we find faith without being led to it? These topics and many others are covered in believable and realistic passages as the dogs each decide on different paths in their lives. Of particular note is the humor and realism that Alexis creates as the dogs puzzle out the behavior of humans. These scenes are equal measures hilarious for the dogs’ misinterpretation of human activities and profound as the dogs come to grips that they are similar but separate from the rest of society.
I can’t honestly think of a book I’ve read that is quite like Fifteen Dogs. Alexis’ writing is confident, the characters are believable, and his situations naturalistic. The book is filled with wit, and the unique perspective of the dogs provides a reading experience that is quite unlike anything else I’ve encountered. What’s more, as far as award-winning literature goes, Fifteen Dogs is not excessively challenging, but highly rewarding. If you’re embroiled in a heavy work schedule or a daunting academic semester, Fifteen Dogs would make a fine choice.
*Update February 2017: I've decided to pass on most of this year's Canada Reads selections after being disappointed with the 2016 selections and having lots of reading on my plate. With that said, and having read none of the other selections, I'd recommend spending time with this one!
December 4, 2015
Okay, I'm half way through this book and I'am not sure how I lasted this long. The author obviously knows nothing about dogs. To settle a bet, two Greek gods give 15 dogs in a pound human attributes, including speech. And they pretty much all turn on each other; many die. Is this a commentary on human behavior using dogs? Whatever it is, it lacks any credibility--even with the willing suspension of disbelief. It is a poorly written book with a bunch of 'characters' who basically become assholes. I don't care where the book is going; I quit. (I live in the area where the book is set; I enjoyed seeing my neighborhood in a book for about, oh, five pages. And then the ridiculousness of the story got to me and overcame any enjoyment seeing my neighborhood in a book gave me.)
April 9, 2022
On the right is my dog Maya, talking to her friend Rocksy when we visited her family in Albuquerque. Rocksy and her people used to live in the apartment one floor below Maya and me in New York City. Rocksy's mom and I became very close, so we visited after they moved back to New Mexico.
Maya died January 18th of this year. Rocksy, a couple of years before that. I imagine they are still having walks and talks.
Not once did I consider Maya (or any of my dogs) a pet. She was my respected partner and I was her Betsy. I was so curious about and reverent of her dogness that I attempted to understand it on every level open to me. My olfactory system is more canine than human and I found I learned to use it better by mimicking Maya's way of using her nose; I knew her different smells and what they meant and if she spent a day away from me, I was all over her when she returned to learn about who had touched her. I spent a lot of time on the floor, looking at things from Maya's height and perspective. And when we were outside, I often shifted to seeing things from her perspective in my mind's eye. I did all this privately and it would never have occurred to me to share this … until reading Fifteen Dogs.
Just when I was almost ready to give up on the human species, there is this: a man named André Alexis has the imagination, wisdom, and skill to write an apologue where gods imbue dogs with human thinking, and thereby expose the story of our entire mess.
I laughed. I cried (a lot). And mostly I'm grateful.
Like my GR friend Phyllis, I will now read all of this wonderful author's books. A million thank yous, Phyllis for your review of this book.
November 10, 2015
Strange that I don't want to write a review for this, because a review won't do it justice. If you're a dog lover, this book will wreck you, and I mean that in the best way possible. Astounding, heart breaking, and easily among the best books I've read this year.
December 8, 2015
My dog can't talk. I checked again this morning. His answer to pretty much everything I say is to play bow and growl at me.
Andre Alexis's book is about fifteen dogs who can suddenly talk - and reason like humans - and it seems tailor-made for college freshmen. Alexis gets an opportunity to blitz us through Philosophy 101 as they wrestle with their new sentience (the dogs, I mean, although watching freshmen wrestle with their new sentience is also entertaining). "One of the qualities his ideal dog possessed was being," one dog muses: "therefore the dog of dogs had to exist," and here's Anselm's ontological argument in all its inanity.
Alexis's dogs are obsessed with status, a primary theme of the book: who is humping whom? Status is not of immediate concern to me, so this theme had limited resonance. But as a guy who spends a lot of time in dog parks, I can confirm that status is of immediate concern to dogs. I'm not sure whether Alexis chose to write about dogs because he was interested in status, or to write about status because he was interested in dogs.
I do think his interest in "status" goes beyond philosophy, though. Look, you can't help but notice sentences like this: "Masters have agreed that their submissives must be bound to them with leashes and collars. If you were a master, would you keep me on a leash?" And in case you think I'm reading too much into that, Alexis goes ahead and throws a full-on human bondage sex scene right in there. Hegel has something to say about masters too, and we're not not talking about Hegel - but we're talking about sex too. There's a current of kink through this book.
It's a fast read, plenty entertaining, and it comes off as a college book. It has some neat ideas but nothing crazy deep. The squeamish may be put off by that healthy but kinky human sex scene, a variety of dog-on-dog action, and/or the many deaths: it's stated up front that dogs will die.
Not my dog, of course. My dog will live forever. Good boy. He glances at me sideways, very quickly, and then play bows.
Andre Alexis's book is about fifteen dogs who can suddenly talk - and reason like humans - and it seems tailor-made for college freshmen. Alexis gets an opportunity to blitz us through Philosophy 101 as they wrestle with their new sentience (the dogs, I mean, although watching freshmen wrestle with their new sentience is also entertaining). "One of the qualities his ideal dog possessed was being," one dog muses: "therefore the dog of dogs had to exist," and here's Anselm's ontological argument in all its inanity.
Alexis's dogs are obsessed with status, a primary theme of the book: who is humping whom? Status is not of immediate concern to me, so this theme had limited resonance. But as a guy who spends a lot of time in dog parks, I can confirm that status is of immediate concern to dogs. I'm not sure whether Alexis chose to write about dogs because he was interested in status, or to write about status because he was interested in dogs.
I do think his interest in "status" goes beyond philosophy, though. Look, you can't help but notice sentences like this: "Masters have agreed that their submissives must be bound to them with leashes and collars. If you were a master, would you keep me on a leash?" And in case you think I'm reading too much into that, Alexis goes ahead and throws a full-on human bondage sex scene right in there. Hegel has something to say about masters too, and we're not not talking about Hegel - but we're talking about sex too. There's a current of kink through this book.
It's a fast read, plenty entertaining, and it comes off as a college book. It has some neat ideas but nothing crazy deep. The squeamish may be put off by that healthy but kinky human sex scene, a variety of dog-on-dog action, and/or the many deaths: it's stated up front that dogs will die.
Not my dog, of course. My dog will live forever. Good boy. He glances at me sideways, very quickly, and then play bows.
January 30, 2019
There is something immediately gripping about this novel. Its core conceit--that 15 dogs become suddenly human-like in their ability to reason and perceive their own mortality--was a very effective way to explore one of the oldest adages in philosophy: whether it's true that "the unexamined life is not worth living." The story is beautifully told. It gave me new spaces in my brain to think about some very old questions.
December 9, 2023
“Humans have no special merit, though they think themselves superior”
Omniscient, all-loving and faultless beyond mere human imagining? I think not. If gods exist, Apollo and Hermes are how I would picture them - self-interested, narcissistic, weary of an eternity in which they jealously long for the death that comes to all humans and willing to treat their human and worldly creations as playthings to satisfy their ennui. Over a beer at a downtown Toronto bar, Apollo and Hermes wager a year’s servitude, one to the other, against the belief that, if fifteen dogs are granted human intelligence, not a single one of them will die happy. And thus begins FIFTEEN DOGS.
As a reader, my money says that Alexis’ intent was to create a fantasy allegory sharing some pithy observations on human nature and to perhaps make some over-arching comments on the good, the bad, the strengths and the weaknesses of what we humans do with our short time on this earth, albeit longer than the time granted to dogs. Perhaps the single most obvious conclusion that one can draw about the authors’ thoughts is that, despite having sentience and the greatest intelligence that evolution has seen fit to create, human happiness is far from a given and, indeed, is quite rare. Different readers will take away different thoughts. For example: language and culture inevitably reflect and contain each other; the real-life language barrier between humans and sentient non-human species will be almost insurmountable; an immortal being could never understand what the daily prospect of death would mean for a human; and so on.
Unlike other animal based allegories such as WATERSHIP DOWN or DUNCTON WOOD, for example, Alexis’ dogs fully retain their canine nature and are never anthropomorphized. Indeed our human nature is intensely confounding for them. FIFTEEN DOGS is interesting and thought provoking to the extent of being quite compelling without being a gripping page-turner in the sense one would describe a typical thriller.
Paul Weiss
Omniscient, all-loving and faultless beyond mere human imagining? I think not. If gods exist, Apollo and Hermes are how I would picture them - self-interested, narcissistic, weary of an eternity in which they jealously long for the death that comes to all humans and willing to treat their human and worldly creations as playthings to satisfy their ennui. Over a beer at a downtown Toronto bar, Apollo and Hermes wager a year’s servitude, one to the other, against the belief that, if fifteen dogs are granted human intelligence, not a single one of them will die happy. And thus begins FIFTEEN DOGS.
As a reader, my money says that Alexis’ intent was to create a fantasy allegory sharing some pithy observations on human nature and to perhaps make some over-arching comments on the good, the bad, the strengths and the weaknesses of what we humans do with our short time on this earth, albeit longer than the time granted to dogs. Perhaps the single most obvious conclusion that one can draw about the authors’ thoughts is that, despite having sentience and the greatest intelligence that evolution has seen fit to create, human happiness is far from a given and, indeed, is quite rare. Different readers will take away different thoughts. For example: language and culture inevitably reflect and contain each other; the real-life language barrier between humans and sentient non-human species will be almost insurmountable; an immortal being could never understand what the daily prospect of death would mean for a human; and so on.
Unlike other animal based allegories such as WATERSHIP DOWN or DUNCTON WOOD, for example, Alexis’ dogs fully retain their canine nature and are never anthropomorphized. Indeed our human nature is intensely confounding for them. FIFTEEN DOGS is interesting and thought provoking to the extent of being quite compelling without being a gripping page-turner in the sense one would describe a typical thriller.
Paul Weiss
February 11, 2016
Hmmm, a whimsical wager by two Greek gods lounging around in a Toronto bar? Eugh. Fifteen random dogs given human intelligence to see if this will make them happier or not? Yeuchhh. So we’re not in Kansas anymore? Nope, we’re smack in the middle of Tweeville.
Alright, so when you get over those two hurdles, it then becomes sweet and quite compelling, but also confusing, irritating, incoherent and mawkish. If you want to shed tears over noble dogs leading lonely lives pining for their old owner to return which they can never do because plot spoiler plot spoiler, or old blind dogs crossing streets by sense of smell alone, okay, you came to the right place. Gee whiz, at times this is like a postmodern Incredible Journey
(except no cats. )
Andre Alexis has his cake and eats it all the way through this entertaining, short, soulful but slightly dodgy novel. He changes the rules about the dogs-with-human-consciousness as it pleases him. Consistency is the bugbear of little minds for Andre Alexis. For instance, the case of Majnoun, the black poodle whose story takes up most of the book. He is adopted by a nice couple Nira and Miguel. When he reveals to her that he can talk in a kind of approximate English Nira freaks out badly and schleps him right back to the vets clinic whence he came. A realistic reaction, one may think. But they go back and get him again, and later, after some months, he becomes Nira’s best friend and confidante, and she has completely accepted his human intelligence; indeed, they have complex, speculative conversations :
There were other problems that, Nira assumed, had their origins in Majnoun’s culture as opposed to his nature. For instance, she thought it distasteful for male dogs to mount females en masse, each waiting his turn. Majnoun did not even pretend to take her distaste seriously. A bitch in heat was a bitch in heat.
And so forth. Now, I must say this is an unrealistic reaction to Majnoun’s intelligence. At no point does Nira realise that a thinking, nay, contemplative dog is an epochal, newsworthy – not to say million-dollar – event. So, you know that our author is not interested really in any kind of realistic stuff here, just in tootling round various philosophical or sociological or cultural points to ponder and using thinking dogs as his peg.
Most of the time this is conducted with insouciant grace and I really did enjoy the violent tale of the undoing of the pack led by Atticus (an imposing mastiff with cascading jowls) but occasionally it all gets really very groanworthy :
It was at this time that Atticus began to pray. He already had a notion of what an idea or pure dog might be : a creature without the flaws of thought. As time went on he attributed to this pure being all the qualities he believed to be noble: sharp senses, absolute authority, unparalleled prowess at hunting, irresistible strength. Somewhere, thought Atticus, there must be a dog like this. Why? Because one of the qualities his ideal canine possessed was being. An “ideal” dog that did not exist could not be truly ideal. Therefore, the dog of dogs, as Atticus conceived it, had to exist.
This is a really crass shoehorning in of the theological argument first proposed a million years ago by I dunno St Augustine or Thomas Aquinas, one of those beardy types, I guess I could google it. Could be students of hmmm Saussure or Popper or Lacan would be groaning in other places as they see their most familiar debating points popping up in this or that dog’s debates.
But heck, this is a quick, entertaining book which succeeds in being different and not boring, so three stars for Fifteen Dogs.
Alright, so when you get over those two hurdles, it then becomes sweet and quite compelling, but also confusing, irritating, incoherent and mawkish. If you want to shed tears over noble dogs leading lonely lives pining for their old owner to return which they can never do because plot spoiler plot spoiler, or old blind dogs crossing streets by sense of smell alone, okay, you came to the right place. Gee whiz, at times this is like a postmodern Incredible Journey
(except no cats. )
Andre Alexis has his cake and eats it all the way through this entertaining, short, soulful but slightly dodgy novel. He changes the rules about the dogs-with-human-consciousness as it pleases him. Consistency is the bugbear of little minds for Andre Alexis. For instance, the case of Majnoun, the black poodle whose story takes up most of the book. He is adopted by a nice couple Nira and Miguel. When he reveals to her that he can talk in a kind of approximate English Nira freaks out badly and schleps him right back to the vets clinic whence he came. A realistic reaction, one may think. But they go back and get him again, and later, after some months, he becomes Nira’s best friend and confidante, and she has completely accepted his human intelligence; indeed, they have complex, speculative conversations :
There were other problems that, Nira assumed, had their origins in Majnoun’s culture as opposed to his nature. For instance, she thought it distasteful for male dogs to mount females en masse, each waiting his turn. Majnoun did not even pretend to take her distaste seriously. A bitch in heat was a bitch in heat.
And so forth. Now, I must say this is an unrealistic reaction to Majnoun’s intelligence. At no point does Nira realise that a thinking, nay, contemplative dog is an epochal, newsworthy – not to say million-dollar – event. So, you know that our author is not interested really in any kind of realistic stuff here, just in tootling round various philosophical or sociological or cultural points to ponder and using thinking dogs as his peg.
Most of the time this is conducted with insouciant grace and I really did enjoy the violent tale of the undoing of the pack led by Atticus (an imposing mastiff with cascading jowls) but occasionally it all gets really very groanworthy :
It was at this time that Atticus began to pray. He already had a notion of what an idea or pure dog might be : a creature without the flaws of thought. As time went on he attributed to this pure being all the qualities he believed to be noble: sharp senses, absolute authority, unparalleled prowess at hunting, irresistible strength. Somewhere, thought Atticus, there must be a dog like this. Why? Because one of the qualities his ideal canine possessed was being. An “ideal” dog that did not exist could not be truly ideal. Therefore, the dog of dogs, as Atticus conceived it, had to exist.
This is a really crass shoehorning in of the theological argument first proposed a million years ago by I dunno St Augustine or Thomas Aquinas, one of those beardy types, I guess I could google it. Could be students of hmmm Saussure or Popper or Lacan would be groaning in other places as they see their most familiar debating points popping up in this or that dog’s debates.
But heck, this is a quick, entertaining book which succeeds in being different and not boring, so three stars for Fifteen Dogs.
September 21, 2017
“Fifteen Dogs” is a multi-award winning novel that I found meditative and enjoyable. Author Andre Alexis uses Greek Mythology to explore the human condition.
Greek Gods, and brothers, Apollo and Hermes, are in a Toronto Tavern pounding back a few while conversing about the nature of humanity. Apollo’s stance is that humans, with their intelligence, are worse off than any other animal. Hermes counters that humans are amusing. What results is a fraternal wager: If you gave human intelligence to an animal, would the animal be as unhappy as a human. It just so happened that the Tavern is near a veterinary clinic that contains fifteen dogs. These dogs are “gifted” with human intelligence.
As the dogs realize their thoughts and awareness, they combine forces and break out of the clinic. I found Alexis’s ideas of canine awareness funny and provocative. For instance, while previously enjoying eating another dog’s poo, the realization that it’s kind of gross to eat poo and it is embarrassing. What’s a dog to do?
There’s a bit of “Lord of the Flies” problem solving. Alexis contemplate how language would affect the canines and how that ability would help/undermine the natural dharma of a dog. There are many provocative ideas tossed about. Mythology is used for humor purposes: the fates are involved and no one likes the fate sisters. Zeus is displeased with his two sons, Hermes and Apollo, messing with mortals. On the whole, it’s a fabulous read, both humorous and reflective. I highly recommend it. Thank you Matthew Quann for bringing this to my attention!
Greek Gods, and brothers, Apollo and Hermes, are in a Toronto Tavern pounding back a few while conversing about the nature of humanity. Apollo’s stance is that humans, with their intelligence, are worse off than any other animal. Hermes counters that humans are amusing. What results is a fraternal wager: If you gave human intelligence to an animal, would the animal be as unhappy as a human. It just so happened that the Tavern is near a veterinary clinic that contains fifteen dogs. These dogs are “gifted” with human intelligence.
As the dogs realize their thoughts and awareness, they combine forces and break out of the clinic. I found Alexis’s ideas of canine awareness funny and provocative. For instance, while previously enjoying eating another dog’s poo, the realization that it’s kind of gross to eat poo and it is embarrassing. What’s a dog to do?
There’s a bit of “Lord of the Flies” problem solving. Alexis contemplate how language would affect the canines and how that ability would help/undermine the natural dharma of a dog. There are many provocative ideas tossed about. Mythology is used for humor purposes: the fates are involved and no one likes the fate sisters. Zeus is displeased with his two sons, Hermes and Apollo, messing with mortals. On the whole, it’s a fabulous read, both humorous and reflective. I highly recommend it. Thank you Matthew Quann for bringing this to my attention!
April 25, 2016
An interesting novel, which has obviously caught the attention of a number of Calgarians. I had to wait a very long time to get it from our public library and when I returned it this morning there were 543 people waiting their turn. It reads quickly, despite the fact that it is jam packed with ideas.
If any of you have read Jo Walton’s The Just City, this book has a similar feel, with the Ancient Greek gods intervening in the lives of 15 dogs—giving them human consciousness and wagering on whether they will be happier or unhappier with this addition by the end of their lives. The Ancient Greeks believed that a person’s life could not be judged until after death—one could live a wonderful life, but die an awful death and thus be a failure. Hermes and Apollo seem to generally agree with this style of evaluation.
Also contains echoes of Orwell’s Animal Farm in regard to the dogs’ negotiations of relationships with humans.
Nominally about dogs, the book actually explores what it is to be human. Are we happier than the other animals on the planet? Or does our awareness of the past and the future entail a burden? How do we judge a life to have been a happy one?
If any of you have read Jo Walton’s The Just City, this book has a similar feel, with the Ancient Greek gods intervening in the lives of 15 dogs—giving them human consciousness and wagering on whether they will be happier or unhappier with this addition by the end of their lives. The Ancient Greeks believed that a person’s life could not be judged until after death—one could live a wonderful life, but die an awful death and thus be a failure. Hermes and Apollo seem to generally agree with this style of evaluation.
Also contains echoes of Orwell’s Animal Farm in regard to the dogs’ negotiations of relationships with humans.
Nominally about dogs, the book actually explores what it is to be human. Are we happier than the other animals on the planet? Or does our awareness of the past and the future entail a burden? How do we judge a life to have been a happy one?
November 26, 2019
Fifteen Dogs blew me away. This book equally gave me Animal Farm, and Lord of the Flies vibes, while remaining something that felt incredibly original. It’s not a story for the faint hearted; the lives of these fifteen dogs are brutal and harrowing in both human and animal ways. But Alexis is unwavering in his exploration of the weight of human consciousness. This novel asks big questions about the impact of this consciousness on our interpersonal relationships, our notions of happiness and unhappiness, and the pursuit of meaning in life. It’s quite exceptional.
April 5, 2024
April 5, 2024 Update Just a quick update to note the restaging of the theatrical adaptation at the Segal Centre, Montreal, Canada playing until April 21, 2024. Tickets and Information here.
Fifteen Dogs Again
Review of the Coach House Books Kindle eBook (March 23, 2015) released in advance of the paperback (April 14, 2015)
I read Fifteen Dogs in my pre-reviewing days at GR and gave it a 5-star rating at the time. I re-read it now after seeing its recent theatrical adaptation at Toronto's Crow's Theatre in January 2023 and it was still a 5-star for me. The adaptation was excellent as well and was extremely faithful to the book.
Publicity poster for the Crow's Theatre theatrical adaptation of "Fifteen Dogs". Image sourced from Crow's Theatre.
As can be read in the book's synopsis, fifteen dogs who are over-nighting in a Toronto veterinary clinic are given the power of human language and consciousness by the gods Apollo and Hermes. This is inspired by a bet that at least one of the dogs will die happy as a result (Hermes) vs. they will all die miserably (Apollo).
There is admittedly suffering and confusion throughout as the dogs struggle with their new capabilities and understanding. A conflict arises between those who accept and relish it and those who turn back to the old dog ways. This aspect of the book can be read as a metaphor for the way humans turn on each other. All of the mythological inspirations, the drama and suspense, the poetry and dog language, the comedy of interaction with humans and the pathos & fantasy were just as interesting to me the second time around. And again I found myself quite choked up at the conclusion.
The 6 member cast of the Crow's Theatre adaptation of "Fifteen Dogs" receive a standing ovation at the conclusion of the play.
In the end the bet is won (no spoiler), but the debate goes on:
Trivia and Links
Until I read the Author's Afterword to Fifteen Dogs I had forgotten that the dog poetry in the book was written with an Oulipo constraint. Oulipo (short for French: Ouvroir de littérature potentielle; roughly translated: "workshop of potential literature") is prose or poetry written with some sort of constricting rule, which is meant to force inspiration. In the case of the poetry "written" by the dogs Prince and Majnoun, the rule is that within the poem the name of one of the 15 dogs must sound when the poem is spoken aloud. For instance, in Prince's first poem it is Majnoun's name in the final line (from Madge, noon):
All of the dog poems and some other excerpts from the book can be seen in my Kindle highlights.
The 15 dog names can be seen below:
Image sourced from the Crow's Theatre online programme booklet for its theatrical adaptation of "Fifteen Dogs".
A review of the theatrical adaptation with several additional performance photographs can be read here.
Fifteen Dogs Again
Review of the Coach House Books Kindle eBook (March 23, 2015) released in advance of the paperback (April 14, 2015)
I read Fifteen Dogs in my pre-reviewing days at GR and gave it a 5-star rating at the time. I re-read it now after seeing its recent theatrical adaptation at Toronto's Crow's Theatre in January 2023 and it was still a 5-star for me. The adaptation was excellent as well and was extremely faithful to the book.
Publicity poster for the Crow's Theatre theatrical adaptation of "Fifteen Dogs". Image sourced from Crow's Theatre.
As can be read in the book's synopsis, fifteen dogs who are over-nighting in a Toronto veterinary clinic are given the power of human language and consciousness by the gods Apollo and Hermes. This is inspired by a bet that at least one of the dogs will die happy as a result (Hermes) vs. they will all die miserably (Apollo).
When Zeus discovered what his sons had done, he sent for them.
– How could you have been so cruel? he asked.
– Why cruel? asked Apollo. Mortals suffer. What have we done to make their suffering worse?
– He’s right, Father, said Hermes. Wipe them out if you don’t want them to suffer.
– They suffer within their own bounds, said Zeus. These poor dogs don’t have the same capacities as humans. They weren’t made to bear doubt or to know that their deaths will come. With their senses and instincts, they’ll suffer twice as much as humans do.
There is admittedly suffering and confusion throughout as the dogs struggle with their new capabilities and understanding. A conflict arises between those who accept and relish it and those who turn back to the old dog ways. This aspect of the book can be read as a metaphor for the way humans turn on each other. All of the mythological inspirations, the drama and suspense, the poetry and dog language, the comedy of interaction with humans and the pathos & fantasy were just as interesting to me the second time around. And again I found myself quite choked up at the conclusion.
The 6 member cast of the Crow's Theatre adaptation of "Fifteen Dogs" receive a standing ovation at the conclusion of the play.
In the end the bet is won (no spoiler), but the debate goes on:
It would have been different if we’d given cats this so-called intelligence, said Apollo.
– It would have been exactly the same, said Hermes. What we should have done was give a human the intelligence and capacities of a dog.
Trivia and Links
Until I read the Author's Afterword to Fifteen Dogs I had forgotten that the dog poetry in the book was written with an Oulipo constraint. Oulipo (short for French: Ouvroir de littérature potentielle; roughly translated: "workshop of potential literature") is prose or poetry written with some sort of constricting rule, which is meant to force inspiration. In the case of the poetry "written" by the dogs Prince and Majnoun, the rule is that within the poem the name of one of the 15 dogs must sound when the poem is spoken aloud. For instance, in Prince's first poem it is Majnoun's name in the final line (from Madge, noon):
The grass is wet on the hill.
The sky has no end.
For the dog who waits for his mistress,
Madge, noon comes again.
All of the dog poems and some other excerpts from the book can be seen in my Kindle highlights.
The 15 dog names can be seen below:
Image sourced from the Crow's Theatre online programme booklet for its theatrical adaptation of "Fifteen Dogs".
A review of the theatrical adaptation with several additional performance photographs can be read here.
July 20, 2015
This is that rare literary novel that has chops but also serious mainstream potential. The story of two gods who give a group of dogs human consciousness in a bet has a lot to say about thought and individuality and what it means to be a person and a dog. It also has a plot full of goodness and violence that keeps the reader turning pages. (I read it in 2 nights and wouldn't stop until I was finished on the second.)
The bet is whether dogs bestowed with consciousness can die happy, so of course the plot involves not just the fifteen dogs but also their deaths. So while this book is probably best appreciated by those who have owned dogs and care about them, they're also the ones who will be most affected by the violence the dogs give and receive. I know many people who say they'll read or watch just about anything unless it involves violence against animals, and yet they're the very audience that will find the most to love here. I'd counsel dog owners to brace themselves but go for it.
It is rare I find a book both thoughtful and meditative but also enjoyable and fascinating. This is that rare book. I hope it finds a significant readership because it really deserves it. I can't think of any other book like it.
I enjoyed the story of Majnoun the poodle and his new owner the most. It's dog lover wish fulfillment of the grandest kind, the kind of dog/human relationship that transcends ownership and becomes something more.
The bet is whether dogs bestowed with consciousness can die happy, so of course the plot involves not just the fifteen dogs but also their deaths. So while this book is probably best appreciated by those who have owned dogs and care about them, they're also the ones who will be most affected by the violence the dogs give and receive. I know many people who say they'll read or watch just about anything unless it involves violence against animals, and yet they're the very audience that will find the most to love here. I'd counsel dog owners to brace themselves but go for it.
It is rare I find a book both thoughtful and meditative but also enjoyable and fascinating. This is that rare book. I hope it finds a significant readership because it really deserves it. I can't think of any other book like it.
I enjoyed the story of Majnoun the poodle and his new owner the most. It's dog lover wish fulfillment of the grandest kind, the kind of dog/human relationship that transcends ownership and becomes something more.
December 17, 2016
After finishing this novel last night I watched the 30 minute long video of Andre Alexis being interviewed.
Being a self proclaimed depressive fit perfectly with the type of person I imagined this author to be.
There was not an ounce of happiness in this story. (Ok possibly the very end depending on how you look at it)
I am a dog lover! If 15 dogs are going to be released from a veterinary clinic most are going to be seeking love and affection.
What we were given was a lot of violence and death.
I am sure there are a lot of intellectual discussions about this novel but I was quite disappointed with the author's negative take on human nature.
I am giving this book 2 stars and that's because I enjoyed being familiar with the various areas of Toronto the dogs encountered.
Being a self proclaimed depressive fit perfectly with the type of person I imagined this author to be.
There was not an ounce of happiness in this story. (Ok possibly the very end depending on how you look at it)
I am a dog lover! If 15 dogs are going to be released from a veterinary clinic most are going to be seeking love and affection.
What we were given was a lot of violence and death.
I am sure there are a lot of intellectual discussions about this novel but I was quite disappointed with the author's negative take on human nature.
I am giving this book 2 stars and that's because I enjoyed being familiar with the various areas of Toronto the dogs encountered.
February 10, 2025
I really didn't expect I would like this one much, stories about dogs are very hit or miss for me. That being said, while this story does indeed feature dogs, it wasn't ABOUT dogs, not really. It's a story about language and the way it shapes and is shaped by contact with the Other and the way it can other us from who we once were. It was a surprisingly complex and layered story.
It was my first time reading this author and I was thoroughly impressed. The book was beautifully written without excessive flourishes and immediately upon finishing it I went in search of more by the author because I needed more of his style. It's #2 in a cycle but I didn't know that until I came to add it on Goodreads and by that point I was already mostly finished reading it, I didn't feel like I missed anything crucial by not having read Pastoral first, it reads as a great standalone.
It was my first time reading this author and I was thoroughly impressed. The book was beautifully written without excessive flourishes and immediately upon finishing it I went in search of more by the author because I needed more of his style. It's #2 in a cycle but I didn't know that until I came to add it on Goodreads and by that point I was already mostly finished reading it, I didn't feel like I missed anything crucial by not having read Pastoral first, it reads as a great standalone.
May 4, 2015
Apologue (ap·o·logue \ˈa-pə-ˌlog, -ˌläg)
— noun:
an allegorical narrative usually intended to convey a moral
Two Greek gods walk into a Toronto bar...and after downing a few Sleemans and riffing on the farce that is human language, Hermes and Apollo decide on a wager: They will grant human intelligence to a random group of animals, and if even one of them is happy at the moment of death, Apollo would owe his brother a year's servitude. Passing by a veterinary clinic, they bestow the “gift” to fifteen dogs that are overnighting, and nearly immediately, the animals' misery begins; with existential crises layered upon their innate behaviours like a teetering jenga tower.
The most obvious result of the gods' gift is that those dogs who decide to pack together in High Park develop a language with which to communicate with each other, and straightaway, this language is used for jokes and puns, and most significantly, one dog discovers poetry. While some of the pack become introspective when they hear Prince's poems, the dominant dogs become confused by the threat that these strange word combinations pose to their status. Like in any decent Greek apologue, tragedy ensues.
The reader understands that we must watch all fifteen dogs die – and that at least the first fourteen must die miserable – or else there is no point to the wager or the book. And so we see much violence – from humans and between the dogs themselves – along with deprivation and the particular heartbreak of watching a dog's loyalty betrayed. The gods continue to meddle, with even the Fates and Zeus himself intervening in the wager, and it becomes fairly clear that human intelligence is no gift at all. (Although, really, the biggest problems arise due to the dual nature of the dogs – they have human intelligence, yes, but retain all their dogness as well.)
Andre Alexis is a really interesting writer, and as I've seen in his earlier works, he likes to use unusual literary frameworks in his books that I, at any rate, need to have spelled out for me. Fifteen Dogs was turned on its head for me when I got to the endnotes (and so the following might be spoilery for those who haven't read it yet):
The poems in Fifteen Dogs are written in a genre invented by Francois Caradec for the OULIPO. It was invented after Francois Le Lionnais, a founder of the group, wondered if it were possible to write poetry that has meaning for both humans and animals. In Fifteen Dogs, each poem is what Caradec called a 'Poem for a dog'. That is, in each poem the name of a dog will be audible – to the listener or to the dog – if the poem is said aloud, though the name is not legible.
For instance, the name of Prince, the poet dog himself, can be found here:
Longing to be sprayed (the green snake
writhing in his master's hand),
back and forth into that stream –
jump, rinse: coat slick with soap
And this information about “poems for dogs” served to highlight the following from Hermes:
Hermes's thoughts turned to Prince. How odd that such a perceptive creature had imagined the death of a language would mean the death of its poetry. For the immortals, all true poetry existed in an eternal present, eternally new, its language undying. Having once been uttered, Prince's verse would live forever.
And so, is that the true gift of human intelligence (and, therefore, the moral)? That language leads to art which leads to immortality? At any rate, this was a highly interesting and enjoyable read (if you can “enjoy” the deaths of fifteen doggies) that gave me much to think about.
May 24, 2017
The ending of Fifteen Dogs was a no win for author and readers alike; well, some of the readers lost, and I came down on the losing side.
The problem (if one can call it that) is built right into the premise. Apollo and Hermes make a bet (and this is no spoiler since it opens the book) that, having granted human intelligence to fifteen dogs in a Toronto vet hospital, not a single one of the fifteen dogs will die happy. Apollo is on the side of unhappiness; Hermes is on the side of happiness. One of them wins and one of them loses, and whoever you are as a reader, whichever side you agree with, when the opposition wins you are bound to be disappointed. That was me. I was on the wrong side.
But the journey to get there was amazing, and the philosophical questions about animal nature, human nature, the nature of memory, language, empathy, the nature of dominance, sexuality, rape, violence, love, hate, the nature of our sensory engagement with the world, the nature of poetry, and the importance of death to life are all worth the trip, even if the pay off may leave you cold.
Dunno when I'll get back to this, but I intend to read it again someday. Maybe soon. Maybe not.
The problem (if one can call it that) is built right into the premise. Apollo and Hermes make a bet (and this is no spoiler since it opens the book) that, having granted human intelligence to fifteen dogs in a Toronto vet hospital, not a single one of the fifteen dogs will die happy. Apollo is on the side of unhappiness; Hermes is on the side of happiness. One of them wins and one of them loses, and whoever you are as a reader, whichever side you agree with, when the opposition wins you are bound to be disappointed. That was me. I was on the wrong side.
But the journey to get there was amazing, and the philosophical questions about animal nature, human nature, the nature of memory, language, empathy, the nature of dominance, sexuality, rape, violence, love, hate, the nature of our sensory engagement with the world, the nature of poetry, and the importance of death to life are all worth the trip, even if the pay off may leave you cold.
Dunno when I'll get back to this, but I intend to read it again someday. Maybe soon. Maybe not.
November 8, 2021
Oh wow, dogs! A light-hearted story about man's best friend, right?
Well, no.
It all begins with a wager. The Greek gods Hermes and Apollo take human form and are hanging out in a bar in Toronto, Ontario.
“‘I wonder,’ said Hermes, ‘what it would be like if animals had human intelligence.’ . . . ‘I’ll wager a year’s servitude,’ said Apollo, ‘that animals — any animal you choose — would be even more unhappy than humans are, if they had human intelligence.’”
Fifteen dogs at a nearby kennel are the focus of their experiment/wager. Now endowed with human-like consciousness and understanding, these dogs navigate downtown Toronto, and things immediately get HEAVY. However, it also gets deep and philosophical, and quite beautiful.
Use of language, consciousness, forming bonds, devotion, art, memory... It's all covered here in sobering detail. A little Animal Farm, a little Aesop's Fables, a little Lord of the Flies. But more poetic in verse and style.
This apologue story style is well-known in history, but doesn't get much modern use. I really liked the the allegory and Alexis' resurrection of this form.
This was my second Alexis this month, and I'm planning to keep going to the third in this loose thematic series very soon.
Well, no.
It all begins with a wager. The Greek gods Hermes and Apollo take human form and are hanging out in a bar in Toronto, Ontario.
“‘I wonder,’ said Hermes, ‘what it would be like if animals had human intelligence.’ . . . ‘I’ll wager a year’s servitude,’ said Apollo, ‘that animals — any animal you choose — would be even more unhappy than humans are, if they had human intelligence.’”
Fifteen dogs at a nearby kennel are the focus of their experiment/wager. Now endowed with human-like consciousness and understanding, these dogs navigate downtown Toronto, and things immediately get HEAVY. However, it also gets deep and philosophical, and quite beautiful.
Use of language, consciousness, forming bonds, devotion, art, memory... It's all covered here in sobering detail. A little Animal Farm, a little Aesop's Fables, a little Lord of the Flies. But more poetic in verse and style.
This apologue story style is well-known in history, but doesn't get much modern use. I really liked the the allegory and Alexis' resurrection of this form.
This was my second Alexis this month, and I'm planning to keep going to the third in this loose thematic series very soon.
April 25, 2017
I wasn't expecting to be so blown away by this. It easily could have been terrible. I'm not usually a fan of novels told from a dog's perspective, which are usually overly sentimental and also require the reader to suspend disbelief at the "dog's" very undoglike thoughts. Alexis dealt with this problem thanks to the novel's imaginative and highly original premise; the Greek gods Apollo and Hermes have a bet over what will happen if you give human consciousness and intelligence to fifteen dogs. Their test subjects are no longer truly dogs, but not human either, and through the fifteen distinct characters of the chosen dogs, Alexis is able to explore the age-old questions and contradictions of what it means to be human.
I honestly can't think of any other book like this. Not only is it rare in its originality, but it's gripping, hugely entertaining and thought-provoking. It's unsettling at times, especially earlier on, where the pack of dogs are faced with a fight for survival and power, but there are also moments that are breathtakingly beautiful and touching. My favourite of the stories were the friendships between Bella and Athena (, and between Majnoun and Nira, which was perhaps the story with most insight and depth into questioning the meaning of life, language and love.
A simply remarkable book, and certainly one of my favourites of the year so far.
I honestly can't think of any other book like this. Not only is it rare in its originality, but it's gripping, hugely entertaining and thought-provoking. It's unsettling at times, especially earlier on, where the pack of dogs are faced with a fight for survival and power, but there are also moments that are breathtakingly beautiful and touching. My favourite of the stories were the friendships between Bella and Athena (, and between Majnoun and Nira, which was perhaps the story with most insight and depth into questioning the meaning of life, language and love.
A simply remarkable book, and certainly one of my favourites of the year so far.
December 3, 2015
Oh my god. Prince and Majnoun. I am heartbroken.
I can't even describe to you how disordered and distracted I was while finishing this book.
So you've read the cover copy and you know that the premise is that Apollo and Hermes have a bet: if you give human consciousness and intelligence to fifteen dogs, will it be a curse or a blessing? Will any of them die happy, or will it make them as miserable as it makes us? And since the bet is only settled when all fifteen dogs have died--you are then treated to the life-and-death stories of fifteen distinct dogs. Fifteen dogs with different personalities, priorities, values, characters and temperaments. Naturally he saves the two with the greatest depth and capacity for affection for last, and thereby reduces the hapless reader to a blubbering mess.
But the book is not actually about the dogs.
The book is about human consciousness and intelligence. What is it? Is it good? Does it make us better or worse? Wiser or duller? More generous or more selfish? How does it relate to language, art, and love? Do language, art, and love make up for the difficulties imposed by consciousness, or do they add to them? What adds meaning to life? What makes it worth living?
I didn't agree with all of his premises. I'm not sure I believe his implied argument that consciousness and intelligence are required to understand and appreciate love. I'm not convinced on his portrayal of dogness, of the importance of dominance and hierarchy to canine culture--or not to that extent. But regardless, the dogs and humans in this book are convincing and beautifully written, their stories told with compassion. It is a gorgeous book.
I can't even describe to you how disordered and distracted I was while finishing this book.
So you've read the cover copy and you know that the premise is that Apollo and Hermes have a bet: if you give human consciousness and intelligence to fifteen dogs, will it be a curse or a blessing? Will any of them die happy, or will it make them as miserable as it makes us? And since the bet is only settled when all fifteen dogs have died--you are then treated to the life-and-death stories of fifteen distinct dogs. Fifteen dogs with different personalities, priorities, values, characters and temperaments. Naturally he saves the two with the greatest depth and capacity for affection for last, and thereby reduces the hapless reader to a blubbering mess.
But the book is not actually about the dogs.
The book is about human consciousness and intelligence. What is it? Is it good? Does it make us better or worse? Wiser or duller? More generous or more selfish? How does it relate to language, art, and love? Do language, art, and love make up for the difficulties imposed by consciousness, or do they add to them? What adds meaning to life? What makes it worth living?
I didn't agree with all of his premises. I'm not sure I believe his implied argument that consciousness and intelligence are required to understand and appreciate love. I'm not convinced on his portrayal of dogness, of the importance of dominance and hierarchy to canine culture--or not to that extent. But regardless, the dogs and humans in this book are convincing and beautifully written, their stories told with compassion. It is a gorgeous book.
December 30, 2015
Trust a pack of dogs to tell us more about what it is that makes us human! Fifteen Dogs started off as a simple story but became more insightful with every twist and turn.
I must admit, I initially resisted this novel due to my snobbery – think about it, a story about fifteen talking dogs sounds like it could go downhill pretty quickly, doesn't it? It was foolish of me to think so as André Alexis has deftly crafted an undeniably entertaining and thought-provoking plot. It's filled with keen observations and sly commentaries on the human psyche, for example, this gem of a line: "Humans do not always mean what is meant by the sounds they make. You must be careful."
It reads easy; simultaneously being poetic and matter-of-factly, like having a narrator convey the stream of consciousness of the pack of dogs even though they are individually presenting their thoughts in serialized chapters. The story is like a puzzle with sliding pieces that when complete, reveals what lies behind the overall picture. Each puzzle piece represents a characteristic and personality trait that make the canines so individualistic.
Social standings and conventions, relationships, belonging and loyalty, love and sex, the passage of time, death and mourning, language, the arts and culture – these were some of the facets of human life that were touched upon to answer what it is that makes us happy to have lived a full life. Happiness - that's the ultimate end goal. And honestly, based on how true to the state of humanity the lives of all fifteen dogs play out, I'm left feeling saddened but also inspired by just how fleeting our happiness can be.
I must admit, I initially resisted this novel due to my snobbery – think about it, a story about fifteen talking dogs sounds like it could go downhill pretty quickly, doesn't it? It was foolish of me to think so as André Alexis has deftly crafted an undeniably entertaining and thought-provoking plot. It's filled with keen observations and sly commentaries on the human psyche, for example, this gem of a line: "Humans do not always mean what is meant by the sounds they make. You must be careful."
It reads easy; simultaneously being poetic and matter-of-factly, like having a narrator convey the stream of consciousness of the pack of dogs even though they are individually presenting their thoughts in serialized chapters. The story is like a puzzle with sliding pieces that when complete, reveals what lies behind the overall picture. Each puzzle piece represents a characteristic and personality trait that make the canines so individualistic.
Social standings and conventions, relationships, belonging and loyalty, love and sex, the passage of time, death and mourning, language, the arts and culture – these were some of the facets of human life that were touched upon to answer what it is that makes us happy to have lived a full life. Happiness - that's the ultimate end goal. And honestly, based on how true to the state of humanity the lives of all fifteen dogs play out, I'm left feeling saddened but also inspired by just how fleeting our happiness can be.
January 3, 2017
I did not like this book, I thought carefully if I could give it a "it was ok" star ranking and I really couldn't. There was nothing I liked about it. I was left with the conclusion that the author was trying to convey major themes about humanity and the nature of humanity. He did. Yet I didn't find the reading the raw, unlikeable characteristics of humanity forced into the noble, pure nature of a dog. I'm a dog lover. There are many reasons I love dogs and their pureness of spirit is something sacred to me. Muddling it and forcing the ugliness of humanity to war with their instincts was not something I found pleasurable.
I am glad to have been challenged in reading this though. If I wasn't reading this for my global book club; I would have abandoned it. But I truly wanted to give it the chance it deserves because this book meant something to the person who chose it to send to me. I have to thank her, because it is always a good thing to be challenged to read a book that is outside of a comfort zone.
I am glad to have been challenged in reading this though. If I wasn't reading this for my global book club; I would have abandoned it. But I truly wanted to give it the chance it deserves because this book meant something to the person who chose it to send to me. I have to thank her, because it is always a good thing to be challenged to read a book that is outside of a comfort zone.
Read
April 14, 2015This book is both a dog lover’s dream come true- and their worst nightmare. Apollo and Hermes are hanging out and decide to have a bet on whether granting a group of dogs human intelligence would make them happy. Eventually the gods and the fates and pretty much everyone gets entangled in this story. But at its heart are the titular fifteen dogs. Poetic Prince, soulful Majnoun, gruff Atticus, and many more. It’s one of those books that manages to make grand statements about the human condition but still works at its heart on a small character-based level. It’s got kind of an Animal Farm vibe with less politics and more poetry. But to see the bet through, we must follow these dogs until their deaths, which also means that this is a tough read for a dog lover. Tough, but so worth it. — Jessica Woodbury
from The Best Books We Read In March: https://bookriot.com/2015/04/01/riot-...
from The Best Books We Read In March: https://bookriot.com/2015/04/01/riot-...
Displaying 1 - 30 of 3,545 reviews