Let me begin by saying the the author had a great idea: introducing a strong-willed, feisty octogenarian sleuth, whose identity is softened by the knowledge that she's a well-meaning grandmother. I like that it's set in a small town, and that the Police Chief is her son. I could like this series much more if the author wasn't lazy about her writing. Or maybe she doesn't credit her readers with much intelligence. In any event, she is halfway to ruining the series instead of elevating it to a series that I would want to own and re-read. Maybe she's now just interested in the paycheck, and not the creative process? Here are some things I feel she is doing wrong:
How to ruin a cute premise for a mystery series:
1. Be sure that the reader is expected to take the sleuth seriously, yet insert ludicrous scenarios in which the sleuth displays neither intelligence nor common sense -- so that it's impossible to take the sleuth seriously. Do this in every single book.
2. Introduce several tropes. Instead of sprinkling them throughout the series in a light-handed manner, cram these tropes down the readers' throats, so that not only are they expecting them in each book, but are dreading their utter predictability.
3. Re-introduce every character (and every place), at length, in every single book. Never assume that the reader is clever enough to use context clues to discern these for themselves; or that they have probably read at least one other book in the series.
4. Instead of being realistic about the occult, make the psychic infallible. I mean, if all psychics were 100% correct, as in this series, wouldn't they be winning every bet in racing, gambling or politics? Yes, it is stated that "you can't control the Sight", but it is tiresome to see the occult portrayed unrealistically, and see blatant foreshadowing with each use. Perhaps the author thinks her audience needs these heavy-handed techniques.
5. Use the exact same adjectives, repetitively, to describe people. In one paragraph, I started counting how many time "braying" was used for Erma. We get the idea!!!
6. Confuse the reader by altering biography facts about main characters. In the first books, Miles was 70; in the latter books, he is now 60-something. I guess an editor, who might have caught this, costs more. Speaking of an editor . . . .
7. An editor could have caught the misspellings of "discreet","discreetly" and "indiscreet" used throughout the series. The author doesn't ever get them right.