"Satire is a genre of literature, and sometimes graphic and performing arts, in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, corporations, government or society itself, into improvement."
I only include this dictionary meaning of "Satire" in the review on the off chance the author reads the review. Because it is clear that no one has actually explained to him what satire is, despite his penchant for having 'a satire' written across the covers of his books. There is no satire here.
Beyond that the story is a mess.
It also doesn't flow. One example is midway through a speech where one of the teens explain how they escaped from the hell portal Plumer inserts a paragraph about how in the coming few days deaths all over the world would increase tenfold and no reason could be attributed to it. It then returns to the character continuing to speak. It's like the author accidentally copied and pasted a paragraph in the wrong location [There is the possibility that this as a footnote inserted into this section but a) the inserted paragraph had nothing to do with what he was saying at the time, and b) there is nothing that makes it seem like it was a footnote - which I guess would be the narrators fault not the authors].
There is also one character named "Ricky Martin" and about half the time the character is mentioned the full name is said (which is a lot of times). No other character gets this treatment. In fact half of them I have no idea if they were even given last names. But Ricky? The author won't let you ever forget his last name. Do you ever constantly call your friend by their full name? Because most of Ricky's friends do. But never once is it questioned or explained that it's an 'inside joke' or something. It's not evenly applied, in that characters swap back and forth from full name to first name. If it was an inside joke by his friends they would apply in consistently (like Young Neil or Stephen Stiles in Scott Pilgrim) It's like Plumer was so impressed with himself for making a joke about the famous singer that he couldn't possibly let you forget.
And then we get to the ending which is an anti-climax followed by a giant deus ex machina. And one in which I don’t think the main characters actually played a part at all, they just happened to be there for. It would have ended pretty much the same way no matter what the main characters had done. In fact the whole ending is like a giant ball of cotton candy sickliness, made all the worse because it is following what is supposed to be a dark book.
One good point I can think of - Plumer can turn a phrase. Individual lines read really well. It's just a shame he can't group them together into something coherent.
---------
Narration is 3.5 / 5
I enjoyed Ann Richardson's narration. She imparts emotion into the reading, making each character distinct. She gets, and is able to convey, some of the snarky teenage mood.
I'm not completely sure she got the book at times though. In a few places I noticed lines from the narrator that should have been conveyed with very dry wit, but they were read straight by her. I think she missed the dry joke that. There is the aforementioned possible footnote issue too.
In the end I would gladly listen to other books narrated by her, I think she is a good narrator, I just don’t think this is the book for her.
---------------
This audiobook was provided by the author, narrator, or publisher at no cost in exchange for an unbiased review courtesy of audiobookblast dot com.