The Illusions of Entrepreneurship: The Costly Myths That Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Policy Makers Live By

by Scott A. Shane

There are far more entrepreneurs than most people realize. But the failure rate of new businesses is disappointingly high, and the economic impact of most of them disappointingly low, suggesting that enthusiastic would-be entrepreneurs and their investors all too often operate under a false set of assumptions.   This book shows that the reality of entrepreneurship is decidedly different from the myths that have come to surround it. Scott Shane, a leading expert in entrepreneurial activity in the United States and other countries, draws on the data from extensive research to provide accurate, useful information about who becomes an entrepreneur and why, how businesses are started, which factors lead to success, and which predict a likely failure.   The Illusions of Entrepreneurship is an essential resource for everyone who has dreamed of starting a new business, for investors in start-ups, for policy makers attempting to facilitate the formation and survival of new businesses, and for researchers interested in the economic impact of entrepreneurial activity. Scott Shane offers research-based answers to these questions and many ·        Why do people start businesses? ·        What industries are popular for start-ups? ·        How many jobs do new businesses create? ·        How do entrepreneurs finance their start-ups? ·        What makes some locations and some countries more entrepreneurial than others? ·        What are the characteristics of the typical entrepreneur? ·        How well does the typical start-up perform? ·        What strategies contribute to the survival and profitability of new businesses over time?  

Genres: Business, Entrepreneurship, Nonfiction, Economics

224 pages, Hardcover

First published January 28, 2008

Reviews

[Diego · Rating 3 out of 5]

Class assigned. This is a pretty grim written outlook on entrepreneurship. The facts presented are interesting but is quite repetitive, and then he has bullet points and conclusions stating the same information. Could just read the conclusions. But the last chapter on whether new company startups versus productivity contribute to job growth and the public policy behind it was more interesting, debunking the myth that simply supporting public policy just to enable startups actually helps job growth. Somewhat interesting book.

[Dustin Allison · Rating 3 out of 5]

This book was very informative, but way too negative. The author clearly had strong views about the myths associated with entrepreneurship that he shattered with loads of data. The problem I had was was with the myths he labled as commonly held beliefs. As someone who has read a lot about entrepreneurship in the last few months, I was confused by many of the "illusions" the author was debunking. Every book I have read so far talks about how difficult it is to run a successful start-up, and how the great majority of them fail.

It also seemed like the author tailored and tweaked the "illusions" to fit the data he had a available. For instance, the author quotes some business website in Dallas as saying entrepreneurs should be willing to take risks, be self-starters, good salesman and so on. But then goes on to debunk this illusion with data showing that the typical entrepreneur is none of those things. This irked me because I don't think the website was making the claim, or perpetuating the illusion, that the typical entrepreneur has those traits. Rather, I'm fairly certain that the website, and others like it, were listing traits that would help you succeed as an entrepreneur. Now the author does go into what a successful entrepreneur looks like, but largely discounts psychological reasons because, I suspect, he wasn't able to find a way to quantify those kind of traits.

All in all though, this book is full of valuable statistics for the would be entrepreneur. Just don't think statistics tell the whole story like the author does.

[Angela · Rating 4 out of 5]

Surprisingly interesting and easy to understand, given the amount of data and references cited.

I appreciate that the author clearly defines his use of the word 'entrepreneur' up front, as it is different from how I understand that word. (Although I am self-employed, I do not consider myself an entrepreneur - I just happen to work as a contractor rather than an employee.) I suspect this may be where some of the 'myths' come in - perhaps some of them are true for other definitions of 'entrepreneur'.

That quibble aside, this was a very worth-while read.

[Paul · Rating 3 out of 5]

Not bad. Bottom line - small businesses are not a good idea for average people. Most small businessmen fail and are unhappy. Popular discourse is overly influenced by the legends of Bill Gates and Silicon Valley start-up titans. Most people are, quite frankly, not cut out for this kind of entrepreneurial glory. We should face this fact and stop creating polices that encourage all people to start small local businesses.

Not sure if I fully agree, but it's a good, well-researched critique.

[Allison · Rating 2 out of 5]

a little slow to read but very informative. will crush the dreams of anyone optimistic about starting their own small business.

[Tech Historian · Rating 1 out of 5]

Wrong from the first page.

Every once in awhile you encounter a book that is flawed from its fundamental premise - this is one of those books - it's wrong from page one.

Scott Shane confuses two different types of entrepreneurship; small business and scalable startups. A small business entrepreneur is someone who is self-employed trying to build and grow a profitable business that can feed his or her family. The U.S. has 5.7 million small businesses (under 500 employees) and over 50% of Americans work in them. The return on investing in these small businesses are low, so capital, if needed is raised from friends/family or traditional bank loans. Small businesses are the heart of Main Street USA.

In contrast, an entrepreneur building a scalable startup is not interested in feeding their family. From day one, their goal is to change the world. They're looking to grow their business to 100's of millions of dollars in revenue and dominate a market or industry. In doing so they need external capital and the size of their opportunity and potential return can attract venture capital. Scalable startups are not found on Main Street. They are concentrated in a few centers of innovation. Silicon Valley, New York, San Diego, Boston, etc.

While they both use the words innovation, startup and entrepreneur - these two groups have very little in common. Their purpose, market size, business model, capital requirements, team, growth rate, etc are radically different.

By combining small business and scalable startups into one category and then trying to analyze them, graph them, plot them, bust myths about them, etc. the author falls victim to the classic "comparing apples and oranges." (Given his work with the Kaufmann Foundation I'm surprised and disappointed.)

I now use this book in my university classes as a perfect example of what happens when you can't tell the difference between small business and scalable startups.

I'll charitably write it off as a book written by academic who's never gotten out of the building.

[Marcio Galli · Rating 4 out of 5]

A good book suggested by my friend Dan Barry. Made me push even further my wish to the field — is a good filter to carry with us and makes me remind of the line that Marc Andreesseen once said somewhere something like this: That being an entrepreneur is like peeling an onion trying to access the multiple layers such as founders, early employees, early customers, angels, investors, markets, and so on. This book shows a bit about some of the layers of the onion.

[Hang Nguyen · Rating 4 out of 5]

read this for my one of my online class

but wow that is interesting. it’s definitely a myth busting book. although I need to keep in mind that things changed, so data won’t stay the same. I don’t agree with everything being sad in this book. but I’m so glad I read it. it’s insightful.

[Olivia · Rating 4 out of 5]

A lot of good information, but redundant in some areas. Good reading strategy can get you through this book in a matter of a couple hours, while walking away with a great deal of useful information.

[RJTK · Rating 3 out of 5]

The data in the book is maybe a bit dated. It's also somewhat less interesting to look at typical startups and broad averages, rather than successful ones. In any case, an interesting read.

[Adam Clay⁵Man · Rating 5 out of 5]

Quickly.. an absolute must read for Entrepreneurs and Entredonneurs, in any and all lan∆gauges, to avoid the more needless savages and ravages of time, and find a local market niche to "take between" and "give between" calm⁴unity provisions, paine points, and needs, that's Wiser than the Negative Norm of Failure.

Please read this Segment by Segment in a Reading Group, reflecting at each together on how the Segment eliminatively affects Your Commercially Assured Life Movement and Busyness Plans, before launching Your next busy-ness. If only this or an even better entrant of this form could be required reading for New Business Formation in Your State, or All States. It could save so many clueless restauranteurs and young technology entrepreneurs from foolhardy ecological failures better undertaken in their 40s or 50s, with deepar skills attained through skilled problem grinding in established commercial lines with durable, transferable attained skills .

No doubt, it serves the State's interests to see and run thru hundreds and thousands and hundreds of thousands of failures, even some of which are done by the naive and untrained, but without this Reading, there is no Conscientious Consent to Entrepreneurship, in the In.der.vie.dual (Individual) Sector of Generally Phase-delayed Philanthropies or in the Social Sector of Instant, More Triple-Bottom-Lined Business Philanthropies. A simple "Driver's License" Exam on these Myths would help enormously to keep students from unnecessarily crashing, and would undoubtedly filter back into the Educational Stack to define the difference between failure-driven, mock-IT-until-You-make-I.T. hopeless (and Hhopeful) n-action for calm⁴⨍(unity) polity ⇌ policy pursuits in the sphere of commercially contract.ed and compact.ed calm delivery⁵.

The canary⁵ rate in the Entrepreneurial Calmunity is uncon.scion.ably high, and must be bitterly fought against to keep calm'petition moving forward for those sans hereditary privilege (and those born into unusual hereditary burdens and constructively n-debt.ed burden paths).

My apologies if i sound, over time, like a broken alarm clock on calm⁴unity. It's a re:current, resonant, periodic, superimposing wave i can't afford to allow going into a force-dampening c.y⁵cle, even if it leaves me suffering moment by moment under draft.ed and re:current Ᏼranch'ing imposter syndromes. There's a big gap between where i want to be and where i am, and if i'm required to keep this up, will always be.

Please Ᏼranch the crux of this reflection out to the Ᏼorlaug Stack.ed Organizations of Wisdom and Knowledge, if You can. Too many people have died in pursuing false Hhopes under Illusions of Entrepreneurship, Indy and Social, outside the Caring Self-Sufficiency of a Right-sized Calm⁴unity ∱TEAM. i fall prey to these delusions myself. While at it, please see, "The Sure Thing", by Gladwell, as well. It's fundamentally T. Successful Entrepreneur ∱Teams are Often Exploitative Alpha, Beta, Gamma Predators, with niche-dominating scope.ed skills, of the sort that every Calm⁴unity needs to create, destroy, and thereby thrive. You may leave "The Sure Thing" thinking of the Entrepreneur not as a risk-taker, but as the most risk-averse of all species. That's rather true, and the systempunk't collapse is carefully plan.ed over generations. So please, if You wish for outrageous, outsized, modest, or motivating capstone fortunes for Your 2nd, 3rd, 5th, or 7th Generation, start Y⁵our planning in this generation, Grandstudent, for Your own phase as a Grandparent and Grandstudent. It not only takes a ⩙illage.. frankly, it takes at least a small City, and Generations to Gracefully Calmpetitively Compete against Competition and Calmpetition, in the deep ⏣, hi-gobbe permanency builds.


A good ⩙eek, a ⩙eek of Peace, may⁵ Gladness Rein, and Calm⁴(t) Increase /
A good ⩙eek, a ⩙eek of Peace, may⁵ Gladness Reign, and Joy Increase.

[Jerry · Rating 3 out of 5]

A great book summarizing a lot of data about entrepreneurship. It is more of an academic "in your head" kind of a book than a "how to" book.I would recommend it for people who advise small businesses or want to understand them.

It doesn't really mention the Pareto principle, but that principle is definitely at work winnowing down the entrepreneurs.

"How many people have to try to start a business to have one company that employees anyone ten years later? The answer: 43. Estimates show that only about one-third of all start-up efforts result in creation of a new firm... But because just under one-fourth of firms (24%) employ anyone, we need 12.5 people to try to start a new firm to get one new firm that employees anyone. Carrying this further, only 29% of new employer firms live ten years, and so 43.1 start-up efforts are needed today to have one firm that employees anyone ten years from now. And how many jobs will that start-up have, on average, ten years after it was founded? The answer is 9."

Here are some of the "Busted Myths" the author discusses:
"America isn't becoming a more entrepreneurial place; the rate at which start-ups are created in this country is actually declining over time."
"Most new businesses are not started in glitzy, high-tech industries but rather in a few subsectors of pretty mundane, run-of-the-mill industries."
"Most entrepreneurs don't select the most profitable industries but instead pick industries with the highest firm failure rates."
"Entrepreneurs don't select industries because they are good for start-ups but rather because they know these industries and because it is easy to start businesses in them."
"The typical entrepreneur doesn't start a business because of a desire to make money, for the thrill of starting businesses, to support their families, or to become well known; the typical entrepreneur starts a business because he doesn't like working for someone else."
"The characteristics that make people more likely to start businesses aren't all desirable; people are more likely to go into business for themselves if they are unemployed, work part-time, have changed jobs often, and make less money."
"Entrepreneurship is not a young person's game; middle-aged people are more likely than anyone else to be entrepreneurs."
"Immigrants are not more likely than the native born to start their own businesses."
"It doesn't take a lot of money to start a business; the typical new business established in the United States takes less than $25,000 in initial capital."
"Most founders don't get money from others; the most common source of capital for a new business is the founder's savings."
"Banks do lend money to new businesses; the most common source of debt for new businesses is commercial banks."
"Most start-ups do not succeed; the typical entrepreneur forms a business that is gone within five years and views his effort to start that company as unsuccessful."
"The typical entrepreneur earns less money than he would have earned had he worked for someone else and has worse job benefits."
"Investing a dollar or an hour of time in the creation of an average new business is a worse use of resources than investing the same resources in the expansion of an average existing business."

[Eric · Rating 5 out of 5]

There are people who like to live their lives by comfortable lies. If you are one of them, this book has nothing for you.

There are other people who live by facts, no matter how uncomfortable, and adjust behavior to fit facts and reshape reality that way. If you're one of those, regardless of whether or not you're thinking of getting into business for yourself, this book is for you.

So much of our public policy and culture is built around entrepreneurial myths which are not only wrong but harmful to operate by. This book explains what they are, how they're dangerous, and how we can build a better entrepreneurial landscape, one that more closely resembles the myth and actually benefits society and the world.

[Ryan · Rating 3 out of 5]

This book upsets tons of generally held beliefs about entrepreneurship. Scott A. Shane points to credible academic research and data to reveal concepts that if understood more broadly by the average entrepreneur (or "want-to-be" entrepreneur) would either prevent a lot of wasted time & capital or enhance their chances of success. In addition, policy makers could more efficiently provide support towards entrepreneurial activity that produces real economic value.

Any entrepreneur or person interested in working with, supporting, or following entrepreneurial activity will gain a lot of great information from this book.

[Jake · Rating 3 out of 5]

Good points in this book. Even though I was skeptical reading it at first, there are some fantastic points to consider. I wasn't on the edge of my seat during the book... and I feel it could have been written with a little more entertainment, but it was nevertheless and interesting read. Short and quick - but I had a hard time looking for time to read with this one.

[Sheyenne · Rating 1 out of 5]

Pretty useless. This is basically a book of compiled statistics. Lots of repetition that felt like it was trying to take up space. A person could read the last couple of pages of the book to see the conclusions that the author came to, but I felt like even these were faulty and didn't take into account the non-monetary rewards of entrepreneurship. Not worth my time.

[JP · Rating 4 out of 5]

This book is concise and surprisingly readable, especially when you consider it's a synopsis of academic findings. Professor Shane summarizes and then dispels the common myths about business. His logic should be considered to inform business development policies - and in most cases the rationale for pursuing them in the first place.

[Vinny · Rating 3 out of 5]

in process. Not great, but interesting. Good to know the real facts are about start-up businesses. Many communities think they are the answer to economic success, but they are probably only one of many pieces.

[Austin Storm · Rating 3 out of 5]

In the beginning the framing device of the book bothered me, because some of the 'myths' seemed a little easy. The book was worth it for chapters 6 and 7. Still, probably more interesting to people who want to /talk/ about entrepreneurship rather than to people who want to do it themselves.

[chipster · Rating 3 out of 5]

dry dry dry and depressing. don't quit your day job.

[Slavo Ingilizov · Rating 1 out of 5]

This is so statistical that it's hard to draw conclusions. Pure statistical data, no interpretations, no guarantees. Too dry.

[Scott Soefje · Rating 3 out of 5]

Too negative, too predictable. More interested in showing the entrpreneurship is not profitable than showing why this is so.

[Phillip Bryant · Rating 5 out of 5]

Some real evidence about the truths of entrepreneurship.

[Greg · Rating 3 out of 5]

pretty good review of entrepreneur statistics