I hated this book and skimmed much of the second half.
The plot in a nutshell: Out of misplaced sense of obligation, the hero marries an uncouth spinster, jilting his fiancée, shaming and humiliating her and ruining her future because he has already taken her virginity. But hey, it’s okay, as he eventually falls in love with his wife and the jilted fiancée turns out to be a bitch anyway.
The story combines two elements I dislike in romance—unrealistic premise and betrayal.
The heroine nurses a crowd of prospectors through illness and they want to reward her. She decides she wants a baby—not a husband, just a baby. The story is set during a period when illegitimate children were outcasts in society and brought great shame to the mother. On top of that, we are led to believe that the heroine is almost destitute, unable to provide for a child. I have no sympathy for a woman who puts her maternal yearnings above the welfare of the child she plans to have. Moreover, the heroine does not appear to have any maternal instincts anyway-there are orphans in the mining camp but she has taken no interest in them. The whole situation is unrealistic, a contrived vehicle to create conflict.
However, if the heroine really wanted a baby, surely in a territory with a huge shortage of women she could find any number of men to have sex with her, including volunteering in a whorehouse if she cannot be bothered with the social aspects of finding a man to bed her.
But, as the plot goes, one of the prospectors has to impregnate her. There are no volunteers. For the sake of decency the impregnation is upgraded to marriage. Again, there are no volunteers. Due to the lack of single women in the West many lonely men scrimp and save to pay the passage for a mail order bride from the East where there is a surplus of unattached females. However, in this story the single men prefer to remain lonely and celibate. Another strike against credibility.
The men draw lots to pick a bridegroom. Despite his imminent wedding to his fiancée, the hero does not exclude himself from the draw, and he gets picked for the duty. He says he doesn’t want to marry the heroine, the heroine says she doesn’t want to marry anyone at all. Both are extremely strong-willed people but somehow they allow themselves to be pushed into saying the required words in the hasty wedding ceremony and end up husband and wife.
The next day they regret the whole thing and decide to divorce, but just to create another contrived twist to the plot, a few days later they have sex—not because of lust, but to try to take care of the impregnation business. Of course, this means the marriage has been consummated and can no longer be annulled. I cannot believe that neither of them thought about this before they jumped into bed.
They still plan to divorce, and yet the hero takes the heroine home to live with his family, introducing her to all and sundry as his wife, at which point he finally gets round to telling his fiancée that she’s been dumped.
The hero is not blind to what he is doing. He broods over the fact that he is tarnishing his honour, shaming and humiliating the woman he loves, ruining her future and creating a scandal that will blight his family and hers for decades to come. But he goes ahead and does it anyway, and instead of trying to limit the damage by going to live somewhere else, he settles on his family's ranch in the town where his fiancée lives, thus ensuring that all their friends and neighbours get to witness the scandal as it unfolds. However, in terms of loss of honour he draws a line at allowing his wife to buy her own dresses, as it would be dishonourable for a man not to be able to support his wife.
The dumped fiancée, who is pregnant, is expected to be nice about it all. She is expected to treat the wife with courtesy. It is not the wife’s fault that the hero drew the lot, they tell her. Nobody suggests that the heroine, who knew the hero was engaged, could have said, sorry, I’ll pass on this one as he is already taken and can you please pick an unattached man for me.
The fiancée is portrayed as a caricature of a spoiled, self-centered bitch. Her hatred of the wife is so fierce, she comes across as hysterical. She is self-absorbed to the extent of appearing delusional. She has secrets to protect, and yet, instead of going away to have the baby—which would protect her secrets—she agrees to save her reputation by marrying the hero’s brother, which forces her to live in the same house as the heroine and is guaranteed to expose her guilty secret. What kind of an idiot would do this–instead of choosing the easy way out by going away to have the baby, she decides to hang around to ensure her misery and ruination?
It’s annoying when characters act in a completely illogical manner for the sake of creating plot twists, and I hate it when the happiness of the central couple is achieved at the expense of someone else’s destruction. Society beauties getting their come-uppance and gutter-girls triumphing over them seem to be a trend for this author. Although I enjoy the writing style, I won’t be reading any more of her books