Open Letter to the Author(s) Alex Rutherford -
"Dear Writer(s),
I've never been a big fan of Aurangzeb, him being a character that history has muddled in so much of confusion and contradiction - that it is indeed difficult to honestly make head or tail of him. You could however, call me something of a fan of this Empire of The Mughal series, it has taught me a great great great deal in a very entertaining, engaging and emotionally moving manner. However, just as with the character of Aurangzeb, i'm at odds with what I think of this last book, It is written just as engagingly as its predecessors, yet the self-evidenced BIAS that the book seems to struggle with, is rather unbecoming - in my humble opinion.
While I loved the book, I was also thoroughly disappointed by the near one-sidedness it seemed to display, by omitting honest details that argued the positive side of Aurangzeb out - deliberately, scantily mentioning them in the book's historical notes (which also suggests that anti-Aurangzeb historical accounts were more relied on), indicating the bias. I was thoroughly afraid of this while reading the Serpent's Tooth, when in passing - the famous incident where Aurangzeb dismounted and began to pray mid-battle, was coloured also with bias - stating it as reckless and endangering his men's lives...when there are contrary accounts, that this fearlessness demoralized the enemy. Quoting the Akham-E-Alamgiri -
"During this campaign Aurangzib did an act which made his fame ring throughout the Islamic
world. While the Mughal army was fighting desperately with the vast legions of Abdul Aziz
Khan, king of Bukhara, the time for the evening prayer (zuhar) arrived. Disregarding the
prohibitions of his officers, Aurangzib dismounted from his elephant, knelt down on the
ground, and deliberately and peacefully went through all the ceremonies of the prayer, in full
view of both the armies. Abdul Aziz on hearing of it cried out, 'To fight with such a man is to
court one's own ruin' and suspended the battle"
- And then with this book - with all due respect, I seem to find a link that everytime Aurangzeb did something good which was inspired by Islam - the bias seemed to jump in. If he hand-wrote the copies of the Quran or stitched caps to sell in the markets - he did it to assuage his guilt. If he re-instated the Jiziyah, there was a rush to state there was an earthquake - but no explanation of what the Jiziyah actually means, what percentage it was, also - how many other taxes Aurangzeb abolished at the peril of the Mughal Empire's depleting treasury. You state he abandoned music, but fail to state that court musicians and courtiers were removed - so that he could save Tax Money, instead of spending it on self-entertainment, unlike previous Mughal rulers (who were lacking thoroughly in such areas of character), this being an interesting contrast to Shah Jahan's project to build an incredibly expensive monument to his wife, on the back of his subjects hard-earned money - paid in taxes. Most strikingly, the book belittles or disregards Aurangzeb's attempts to humble himself and not appear like a god-like figure, as the other Mughal and other historical rulers tried. I believe these should have necessarily been dwelled upon - being unique contrasts seen in an emperor.
That being said - I agreed with book's percpective on more than several instances, i,e. Aurangzeb's apparent alienation of people, especially his Hindu subjects and his children, also the continued mistreatment of prisoners and the mutilation of the dead - which I don't think are condoned by Islamic rulings, as Aurangzeb should have known (even if all rulers at the time, regardless of religion, didn't care about this). Also the arrogance with which he is said to have dealt with Shivaji was unbecoming and again not in line with the teachings of the prophet - which again Aurangzeb should have known. The imprisonment of Zebunnissa was underwritten, she is an interesting character and the book disregards that she was Aurangzeb's favourite, who used to argue with him and who he pardoned many times, before harshly imprisoning her, who was a great and rebellious poetess. This almost surprised me as much as the disappointing omission of the famous Birbal, from Akbar's book.
Actual exciting historical incidences the book could have included to make for a grander read -
- A really witty and provocative letter, filled with sarcasm, which Shivaji wrote to Aurangzeb - the letters claims weren't entirely true, but witty and eloquent at the very least. Also, i'd love to read more of Aurangzeb's view of him.
- Aurangzeb gloriously kicking the Britishers' backside and bringing them to heel, when they tried putting their plots into place prematurely. Also, a more detailed account of how the famous pirate Henry Every - hijacked the largest ship of that time which belonged to the Mughals, which was bound for Mecca - filled with pilgrims.
-The book unfairly portrays the Mughal Empire during Aurangzeb's rule as an empire that wasn't doing very well, and while it's true Aurangzeb spent most of his times in futile wars, the book jumps the years where the Mughal Empire during his reign was probably accounted as the most powerful kingdom on earth, and most richest, and how keeping order in such a gigantic empire - was almost an inhuman task for one man to manage (despite Aurangzeb still attempting to unwisely micro-manage everything).
Finally -
I thank you for an amazing series that I enjoyed every bit of. More than anything it made me realize how contrary to my Indian belief, the Moghul's weren't Muslim conquerors as much as they were Timuri conquerors, and how Islam was secondary for them (except of course Aurangzeb). In India, it is important to understand this, as most people like to point out the Mughals as an example of Islam being spread by the sword. I would love to read a similar series by you - Alex Rutherford - of the Ottoman Empire, the period during which the sciences, arts and technology blossomed under Islamic rule and patronage, while Europe slumbered in the Dark Ages (another forgotten and misunderstood time in history).
Thank you for these books! I shall treasure them as fantastic inspirations for inspiring a more inquiring approach with history!
Keep writing.
Saad