An innovative and illuminating look at how the evolution of the human species has been shaped by the world around us, from anatomy and physiology, to cultural diversity and population density.
Where did the human species originate? Why are tropical peoples much more diverse than those at polar latitudes? Why can only Japanese peoples digest seaweed? How are darker skin, sunlight, and fertility related? Did Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens ever interbreed? In Humankind, U. C. Davis professor Alexander Harcourt answers these questions and more, as he explains how the expansion of the human species around the globe and our interaction with our environment explains much about why humans differ from one region of the world to another, not only biologically, but culturally.
What effects have other species had on the distribution of humans around the world, and we, in turn, on their distribution? And how have human populations affected each other’s geography, even existence? For the first time in a single book, Alexander Harcourt brings these topics together to help us understand why we are, what we are, where we are. It turns out that when one looks at humanity's expansion around the world, and in the biological explanations for our geographic diversity, we humans are often just another primate. Humanity's distribution around the world and the type of organism we are today has been shaped by the same biogeographical forces that shape other species.
My mother recommended this survey of "human biogeography." She is not an academic, but has been an avid reader and a curious person for over seven decades.
I wasn't sure that I wanted to read it, as I have read some other bits of 'human prehistory' before. But of course I want to feel closer to my mother so I determined to at least try it. I found that it did get off to a slow start. I also found the blurb a bit misleading. But I did finish it, and I am glad I did.
The bits I marked: 1. "In a book that celebrates diversity by trying to understand it, the concept of 'race' has no place." 2. "We are all African." This is the title of chapter 2, which outlines so many details of so many stages of migration I just couldn't master it, and finally just 'read' it w/out absorbing it, and moved on to the next chapter. But again, the point is that there is no "African race" or anything like it. 3. "We landed on New Zealand... just seven hundred years ago." 4. "The philosopher of science David Lee Hull... reports Thomas (Henry) Huxley's contention that scientists should be strangled when they reach sixty years of age so they do not hinder the progress of science." 5. "In the same paper that produced "Eve," Rebecca Cann and her co-authors also showed that the peoples of Africa are more genetically variable than are the people of any other region. 6. "None of us lack African genes, but plenty of us lack Australian, Asian, or American genes." 7. "[T]he distribution of gene types in Europe looks like a map of European countries. With different gene types in different colors, and no country borders drawn, there is Portugal to the left of Spain... and so on." 8. The Discovery of France: A Historical Geography from the Revolution to the First World War by Graham Robb lists all these words for "yes" in the major dialects of the country (please forgive lack of diacritical marks): O, Oc, Si, Bai, Ya, Win, Oui, Oyi, Awe, Jo, Ja, Oua. 9. "In sum, the extraordinary biodiversity of the tropics is matched by the extraordinary cultural diversity." That's from a section that enhanced both my understanding of the whole "rainforest as treasure-house" concept and clarified that humans are really animals.
Note: these are just the bits that interested me enough to report here. In no way are they to be considered any sort of 'executive summary' or even fair sample of Harcourt's book as a whole.
Includes index, notes, sources, illustrations, and photos.
I anxiously awaited the release of this book as I am fascinated with evolution and anthropology. I thought it was well-researched and provided a detailed, mostly unbiased explanation of how we became what we are today. I learned a lot from this book and accumulated a bag full of "did ya knows?" to add to conversation. The most interesting chapter for me was "Variety is the Spice of Life", which offers theories on why we look different depending on where our ancestors came from. However, the book read too much like a textbook for me to become fully immersed in it. I found it monotonous at times and was bored by the excessive qualifiers and exceptions.
Camels in Asia are different than camels in northern Africa. So, why do some people have a problem with the idea that humans from the Arctic are different than humans from Tonga? The author is a "bio-geographer" (did you know there was such a thing?) and he's concerned that real issues, such as medical differences, between people of different races are ignored in service of avoiding racism. He explains some of the biological differences in different races and nationalities. (People in Africa, for example, have evolved strategies for avoiding malaria which their descendants who have lived in America for generations have lost.) He also discusses the latest ideas on how and when humanity spread throughout the world.
I can't slog my way any further in this book. While the author makes some interesting points, those are too few and far between to keep my interest when I could be reading something MUCH more fun.
I was excited to read this, because the tag line is absolutely intriguing, and while there are fantastic nuggets of information in here, for me, it was kind of a slog. I am a reader without an anthropological background and there was a lot of just infodumping of places and timelines and names that I could not keep up with. The structure only made it more inaccessible; the chapters are incredibly long, without natural breaking points or organization, and the kind of rambling way the information was presented and referenced made it hard to find a place to pause to take in what I'd just read. It more or less feels like a transcript of a lecture, rather than an attempt to engage a broader target audience.
Those gripes aside, there is a lot of genuinely interesting information in this book that I will come back to and reference in the future, and it's prompted me to think about people and the world in a way I hadn't before. I just wish it was presented in a more thoughtful, concise manner.
What can be more fascinating about humans than the way we got to where we are? Yes, to talk about that subject means following our evolutionary paths, our genetics, behavior, and a great deal of piecing together a history of crossing landscapes. Harcourt tries his best to take us along these several paths across time and space. The book has has a huge scope and much is crammed into its pages. There is no current challenger in the field of biogeography and I hope Harcourt writes an update. And in the new book I hope he will put A LOT more graphics. A few photos didnt satisfy me and what is biogeography without landscapes? Landscapes require MAPS. I wanted more maps, lots more maps. Next time? Meanwhile, a good update on how humans spread around the world, diversity and more.
A great update on the status of human and other hominid genome sequencing, as well as a fascinating history of how we have interacted with our environment, shaping it as it shapes us. An enjoyable read. It's a difficult task to take on, explaining several fields of science simultaneously in a conversational tone, but this book achieves it. As a scientist, I thought the narrative screamed for charts and maps, but that might not be for everyone. The book ventures into a challenging area - explaining the history of Homo sapiens and some of the ways we differ from each other. Overall, very informative. A great work of accessible science.
The book was interesting but very slow reading as it is a dense compendium of biology and anthropology and how the human race diversified over the millennia. The author obviously did a huge amount of research for this book. One of the things that slowed me down was the many sections on the differences of opinion among other scientists about how we developed and ranged around the world. All in all he gave a very even account of how we got to be who we are and where we are...his words.
I have also read few similar books of this subjects, but this one gave us a more possible ideas about humankind moving away from Africa due to climate changes, we are not sure if we are the 100% cause of many big sizes animals to go extincted, because there are not only just 1 time climate changes, but certain big animals lived through them. Our moving with the getting warm/getting cold of climate also made us move our agriculture with us, means we need to destroy local environment from forest to farmlands. Direct eating them as food or indirectly decreased their numbers due to destroying their habitation could both accelerate the extinction.
A wonderfullly intriguing and enlightening comprehensive picture about how and why our species' phenotypes diverge from each other due to biogeographical evolutionary pressures. p.39 "We humans are all so obviously and so recently of African origin regardless of our skin color, we almost all so obviously originated somewhere other than where we are now, and we are almost all of us such a mixture of peoples from different regions that to define any one of us as being of a particular race is, scientifically, an utterly empty statement -unless we are all defined as Africans."
A fascinating examination of how we (humankind) became who/what we are. Harcourt, professor emeritus of anthropology at the University of California, Davis, traces the journey of the human species out of Africa and describes the biological and geographical forces which have shaped the beast into what it is today in all its glorious variety. In the process he never shirks from noting differences of opinion or separating theory from established fact. His explanations of how environment, biology and even culture have shaped the differences between members of the same species across the world are lucid and backed by the latest scientific thought. Evolution is an ongoing process and more changes lie ahead. In an epilogue, while ending on an optimistic note, Harcourt warns we are not eternal. We are the surviving branch of a much larger tree of ancestors gone extinct. "Now in a world in which our technology allows exploitation on a massive scale," he writes, "that same greed makes us fat, and it makes us lethal--to ourselves as well as to the world."
UC Davis professor Harcourt examines how humanity's interaction with the environment helps explain the biological and cultural differences between human populations. He discusses a number of fascinating topics, and, as this book was published this year in 2015, gives us the latest research and theories.