Well, the first third of the book involves long, ponderous descriptions of visuals and very little character development, so little character development that when a girlfriend dies horribly, my response was a casual "How unfortunate". When they didn't find any signs of her body after the intense inferno, my response was "She's not dead".
The descriptive visuals were not only ponderous, he later explained things twice.. the historical description of one of the sectors of an enclave in or near Cairo (once was enough) was repeated in the later half of the book. He mentioned twice (once in the beginning and once in the end) that the book "The English Patient" was what brought him to Egypt as if we hadn't already read that.
Now, I know I nitpick, but when my major response to a read is to nitpick it to death, that usually means the plot and characters were not as noteworthy as they should have been. It was way too predictable
Grammar was almost always correct. If that's the best I can say about a book, it's really not that good. I award it two stars for Good Grammar. sheeesh