Edited
You can see what enraged me, below.
The book is a very interesting & easy read, lovely for people who are interested in the "character" of a place, in lore & legend. However, it becomes more ordinary in the part after 1980. I wonder if it is because it is the part that I am personally familiar with?
...
Great read, but ?? misogynistic?
I was seriously enjoying this very fluid, nostalgic, but factual, unbiased account of the many periods of Bangalore ...
Then in pg 96 comes "slowly out of circulation, like an overused mistress". I was shocked. It conjured images of a 35 something woman, dying of AIDS. Is this book so old?I thought? Was it common & ordinary to be callous towards sex workers in everyday parlance when it was written?
Anyway, I read on.
Pg 110, "But girls in dress were considered to be game for fun, , a misconception which persists, though everyone is now wearing stretch jeans & short tops. That they are game for good fun may not be a misconception."
This is just preceded by the description of an incident where English soldiers try to molest author's aunts.
I am very grossed out.
I might not finish the book, even though I was liking it a lot.