A tale of friendship, death, and survival, this is the first group biography of the men who survived the Terra Nova expedition
In February 1912, Harry Pennell and his Terra Nova shipmates returned to Antarctica expecting to celebrate Scott’s conquest of the Pole. Forced by ice to leave before their leader returned, they sailed to New Zealand to discover Amundsen had reached the Pole in December 1911. Returning to Antarctica in January 1913, they learned the tragic news that Scott’s party died on their return from the Pole. Back in New Zealand, Pennell secretly cabled London with the news, while in England a cycle of medal ceremonies and memorial services were soon overshadowed by the outbreak of war—a war that would soon include Pennell and his shipmates. Of the eight men photographed on board the Terra Nova in Antarctica in early 1912, four would die in conflict. Amongst the battles and bad news, however, there were reunions, romances, weddings, births, and tales of survival against all odds.
A trove of delightful inside information that was new to me. Unfortunately when the author relies solely on her memory and simply "knows" an item to be true, she makes more a few factual errors. One of the more exasperating, particularly as the assertion is made repeatedly, is Cherry-Garrard's being referred to as a trained biologist with a degree in that field (the Oxford educated Cherry-Garrard, Wilson's "adaptable helper", read Modern History and Classics). Happily, all the "good stuff" is fully sourced. Those with a solid grounding in the subject, and thus unlikely to be misinformed by the author's occasional small slip, will find this book most worthwhile.
Lots of fascinating information about the post-Antarctic lives and careers of members of Scott's 'Terra Nova' expedition. In particular, Strathie discusses their participation in the First World War - in which several of them died, and many served with distinction in fields as far-flung as Gallipoli, Murmansk and the Western Front.
However, the whole is somehow less than the sum of its - albeit interesting - parts, as the author tries to marshal a narrative with dozens of disparate characters over the period of a decade. To be fair, I am not sure it would have been possible, given the source material, to have pulled it together much more tightly.
This book was as emotionless as a bullet-pointed timeline. There was no depth of information--too many names and only surface-scratching details. Subject matter transitions within chapters were sloppy, if existent at all. And there were several typos! The editor did no favors for this author.