Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Teaching Students with Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, OWL LD, and Dyscalculia: Lessons from Science and Teaching

Rate this book
How can teachers provide effective instruction for students with learning disabilities while meeting the needs of all students? The second edition of this accessible text gives K–12 educators research-based answers, straight from two highly respected voices in the field. The first teacher training text to cover all four learning disabilities that require differentiated instruction—dysgraphia, dyslexia, dyscalculia, and oral and written language learning disability (OWL LD)—this book prepares educators to deliver explicit and engaging instruction customized to the needs of their students. Critical insights from diverse fields blend with lessons learned from actual teaching experience, making this an ideal preservice text and a great in-service professional development tool.


THE BOOK TEACHERS NEED TO
strengthen instruction with current research findings from many fields—including genetics, neuroscience, linguistics, and education
help all students (including students with specific learning disabilities) develop oral and written language skills and proficiency with math concepts and problem solving
use differentiated instruction to organize their classrooms, routines, and lesson plans
uncover both the why and the how of differentiated instruction, so they can adapt their teaching techniques as needed
meet Common Core State Standards while addressing the learning needs of individual students
apply a specific instructional framework that helps students overcome working memory inefficiencies and related problems
create a positive learning environment that promotes intellectual engagement and social emotional development


WHAT'S NEW: A timely new chapter on using technology for accommodations and explicit instruction * Research Lessons that demystify new findings * Teaching Tips featuring educators’ voices of experience * more on in-service preparation for educators on interdisciplinary school teams * guidelines on addressing current challenges in the field * coverage of specific learning disabilities related to math * recommended practices for meeting Common Core State Standards *

320 pages, Paperback

First published April 5, 2009

22 people are currently reading
155 people want to read

About the author

Virginia W. Berninger

20 books2 followers
Virginia Wise Berninger, PhD (Ginger) is a Professor of Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington, former Program Coordinator of APA-accredited and NASP- approved School Psychology Program, and Principal Investigator of NIH Center Grant on Defining and Treating Specific Learning Disabilities awarded December 15, 2011 for five years. She has been on the University of Washington faculty since 1989, and is also a Research Affiliate (1994-present) and Coordinator Research Specialization for Learning Disabilities (2000-present), Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC).

Professor Berninger is a licensed psychologist and former teacher (general education, special education, and reading specialist) with extensive experience in school-related assessment, consultation, and research. She is the Principal Investigator and Director of the NICHD-funded, University of Washington Multidisciplinary Learning Disability Center and Center for Oral and Written Language Learners (OWLs). During her 30 years of research on normal reading, writing, and math development and learning disabilities in reading, writing, and math, she has authored, co-authored, or edited over 200 research publications, including 12 books.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
23 (40%)
4 stars
17 (29%)
3 stars
10 (17%)
2 stars
6 (10%)
1 star
1 (1%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for Lars Guthrie.
546 reviews192 followers
October 15, 2009
My sister and I read this as part of our informal book club. We read books that connect to our work: tutoring kids and particularly kids who have difficulties with, and different ways of, learning. We're going to be seeing Berninger and Wolf make a presentation this weekend.

I had difficulties reading 'Teaching Students,' but there are many good reasons to do so and I will undoubtedly be returning to it as a resource. I've been interested in Berninger's work for a while, especially her investigation into handwriting and its possible importance in literacy. She and Wolf are respected and well known in their field.

'Teaching Students' contains many bits of information and insight which furthered my own knowledge or crystallized my thinking. For example, Berninger and Wolf clearly frame the central thesis of Venezky's 'The American Way of Spelling,' a book I struggled to get through.

My own framing of that thesis had been a little murky and now I can proudly tell you that Venezky's main idea is that our spelling represents our speech and because of that is predictable, although not at a single-letter level and not with one-to-one sound-to-symbol relationships, 'but rather alternations.' (I love that word!) A beautiful distillation.

Another jewel of vocabulary used by Beringer and Wolf that made sense to me was 'habituate,' in the psychological sense of reducing response through repetition. How often educators label a lack of response as learning laziness or inattention, rather than examining the teaching and following the principle Berninger and Wolf lay out: that 'short duration, constant change that introduces novelty, and predictable routine across lessons can help students attend, engage, and self-regulate their learning.'

The Venn-diagram, three-circle graphic for the processes involved in learning to read and write, that Berninger supplies from her 'Process Assessment of the Learner' is a wonderful model to which I know I will return. I also like the pyramid hierarchy for three levels of diagnosis (dysgraphia, dyslexia and oral and written language learning disability, or OWL LD) for reading and writing problems.

I got a ton of ideas for my work from the chapter called 'Teaching Oral Language,' and because of this work, I'm about to read Roald Dahl's 'The Vicar of Nibbleswicke,' and there are a number of other books referenced in 'Teaching Students' that I'm sure to read in the future.

Even with all of those bright spots, reading 'Teaching Students' is like slogging up an unnecessarily muddy road. The authors use a stilted tone (they refer to themselves as 'the first author' and 'the second author') and I found myself habituating as I trudged through convoluted passages filled with academic hot air and repetition. One chapter begins:

'Teaching is what teachers do--what they say and write verbally and communicate nonverbally and how they structure learning activities and situations for teacher-directed explicit instruction and student-guided learning and discovery. Learning is what students do....'

And so on. Empty verbiage.

I find myself frustrated with a convention used by many of the people who write about teaching reading and writing to children that Berninger and Wolf employ over and over again--making a supposed scientific research-based statement of accepted theory (often starting with the words, 'Research shows...') followed by a parenthetical laundry-listing of sources and dates. I long for works that would really get into that research as books about neuroscience do.

For that matter, Richard Nesbit in his 'Intelligence and How to Get It' posits that much of what is called 'research' in education is shoddy and sloppy. But there seems to be little crossover between investigations of teaching by educators I respect, like Berninger and Wolf, Marcia Henry and Louisa Moats, and the new wave of neuroscience researchers led by people like Nesbit, Antonio Damasio, and even entrepreneurs like FastForWord's Michael Merzenich. How come?

Overall, too much work for too few results.
Profile Image for Kimberly.
494 reviews12 followers
November 5, 2013
This book was so useful, I don't think I stopped taking notes. Should have bought it instead of borrowing from the library. Only reason it doesn't get all 5 stars from me is because I need vital information/images/examples from the workbook that goes with it, which my library does not have.
47 reviews3 followers
April 27, 2024
This book gave our family the words "ear reading" to describe listening to audiobooks. That phrase has been a game changer especially for those who may say that listening to audiobooks is cheating.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.