Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Confirmation Mess: Cleaning Up The Federal Appointments Process

Rate this book
Stephen L. Carter tells what's wrong with our confirmation process, explains how it got that way, and suggests what we can do to fix it. Using the most recent confirmation battles as examples, Carter argues that our confirmation process will continue to be bloody until we develop a more balanced attitude toward public service and the Supreme Court by coming to recognize that human beings have flaws, commit sins, and can be redeemed.

272 pages, Paperback

First published January 28, 1981

1 person is currently reading
39 people want to read

About the author

Stephen L. Carter

27 books457 followers
Stephen L. Carter is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law at Yale where he has taught since 1982. He has published seven critically acclaimed nonfiction books on topics ranging from affirmative action to religion and politics. His first novel, The Emperor of Ocean Park (2002), was an immediate national best seller. His latest novel is New England White (Knopf, 2007). A recipient of the NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Literature-Fiction, he lives near New Haven, Connecticut."

Also writes under the pen name A.L Shields.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (6%)
4 stars
5 (31%)
3 stars
8 (50%)
2 stars
2 (12%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Sheldon Lehman.
338 reviews
September 23, 2012
Again, this book was written some years ago, but the points made are scaringly appropro for today. Some really good ideas.
144 reviews4 followers
April 22, 2017
I'm generally a big fan of Professor Carter's work. This was...disappointing. Perhaps I had too high of expectations. I knew this book would be dated, he discussed the issue when problems with partisanship and hard-edged ideology were just beginning, things have gotten much worse, but I expected him to take step back and look at the more underlying ideological and social reasons for these political problems. He really didn't go as deep as I'd hoped.

That said, it's still an interesting look at what was going on at the time and what people were thinking, and in some ways it served as a warning beacon. If seen as such, it's still worthwhile.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.