What do you think?
Rate this book


216 pages, Hardcover
First published January 12, 2016
"Each genetic lineage is estimated to provide less than 1 percent of one’s total ancestry. Put another way, these analyses follow ancestry of a single individual back ten generations and more than one thousand ancestors, yet matrilineage and patrilineage testing only offer information about a portion of these. If we think of one’s ancestry as an upside-down triangle, these forms of ancestry tracing follow the lines to the left and right of the triangle point, but offer no details about the shape’s filling."
"... contemporary racial politics have begun to move into the terra nova—if not the terra firma—of genetic genealogy.
“I don’t think it’s necessary for all of us to become involved in [African] politics because if you don’t live there, I don’t think you know what’s going on in their politics. The other complication is that in Africa, ethnicity is a serious issue. Now, I took the [African ancestry] test and was half Zeframani and Tikar from Cameroon. I know what that means historically, but I don’t have the same feelings as a Tikar about his or her place in society… We’re cousins, we’re not brothers and sisters… Even when you’ve got proof, it would take you some time to adjust to the fact that this is your relative now; you’re cousins… The feeling of kinship doesn’t normally follow. It takes time to establish… You can establish kinship with anyone… But it’s going to take some time; it’s going to take some work.” (204)
“I think I’ve been to like twenty-eight countries... And I don’t try to pretend that I’m African. I’m a descendant, but I’m not an African, I am an American. You know, I get along much better, the people who come and pretend that they’re exactly the same; they have a problem, because you’re not.” (204)
“While attention on genetics is today understandably focused on the potential for its medical application, it is by attending to the social life of DNA that we can appreciate—and truly assess—our collective condition. Reconciliation projects spurred by DNA testing may be starting points for such dialogues, but we cannot rely on science to propel social change.” (219)