This is a book which serves the main purpose for teaching young children about the senses. The title was so cute, I couldn't resist, and I would definitely say it works for the two to four year age group. Any children older than that would have a difficult time staying interested. There is no storyline, and the book only focuses on each of the senses, one-at-a-time. The book starts off with one of the senses in bold at the top of the page followed by some small illustrations with some things that young children often associate with that sense. For example, the first sense in bold says "HEAR," and is followed by "I hear the birdie," with a little girl pointing to a bird in a tree. The next example is a little boy who sees a bee and it says "I hear the bee. Uh-oh!" and then illustrates and lists several more examples for "hear" for the next four to five pages. The next sense is "SMELL." The first example on this page is a picture of a girl, standing at a sink and says "I smell the soap." None of the examples relate to one another and examples are different for each sense. I have a problem with this because of the title, but I'll discuss that later. So moving on, the only mention of a pickle, as in the title, was on the very last page. The last page describes a pickle according to all of the senses, which by the way, seems more like an add-on, as if the author forgot she entitled the book "I Hear a Pickle," and had to tie it in somewhere. So my criticisms are: one- there is no storyline and therefore, this book is not suitable for all ages and will bore older children, and two and three- the title had been forgotten. For the second criticism, none of the examples relate to each other and are completely random. That's an author's choice, I know, but if the title promised the author would stick to one object, than this should have been carried out throughout the book. For the third criticism, the pickle, as a title, was supposed to be the main object/character/conflict/something! Otherwise, it looks like the author forgot and had to add that in, or as though the author started writing the book without a direction and decided to just end it somewhere quick. So again, young children, two to four years of age, will not notice the critiques I have discussed here, and may very well enjoy the book, but for those reasons I discussed, I do not recommend teachers read this in your elementary classrooms.