Alternately illuminating and maddening. Wilson tries too hard to prove his point that Lynch is essentially a Gnostic filmmaker, which leads to him badly misreading Eraserhead and giving Wild at Heart far more credit than it deserves. Truth is, I spent most of my reading-time pushing back against Wilson’s idea of Gnosticism, which seems basically a-historical and fuzzy—he calls it an “existentialist interpretation” of Gnosticism, but he doesn’t seem to engage critically with Gnosticism at all. He seems to be of the “if it’s Gnostic, it’s peachy” camp. All the same, his comments can be helpful, and he does engage with a pretty broad range of Lynch-related literature. His chapter on Mulholland Drive is especially good. His concept of Transcendental Irony sounds a lot like the “commedic” view, the juxtaposition of extreme seriousness and extreme hilarity—which was in many ways a precursor to camp. In all, an interesting read, but not as helpful as I would have liked.