Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Strange World of David Lynch: Transcendental Irony from Eraserhead to Mulholland Drive

Rate this book
Anyone who has sat through the dark and grainy world of Eraserhead knows that David Lynch's fi lms pull us into a strange world where reality turns upside down and sideways. His fi lms are carnivals that allow us to transcend our ordinary lives and to reverse the meanings we live with in our daily lives. Nowhere is this demonstrated better than in the opening scene of Blue Velvet when our worlds are literally turned on their ears.

Lynch endlessly vacillates between Hollywood conventions and avant-garde experimentation, placing viewers in the awkward position of not knowing when the image is serious and when it's in jest, when meaning is lucid or when it's lost. His vexed style in this way places form and content in a perpetually self-consuming dialogue. But what do Lynch's fi lms have to do with religion? Wilson aims to answer that question in his new book, The Strange World of David Lynch.

To say that irony (especially of the kind found in Lynch's fi lms) generates religious experience is to suggest religious can be founded on nihilism. Moreover, in claiming Lynch's fi lms are religious, one must assume that extremely violent and lurid sexual films are somehow expressions of energies of peace, tranquility, and love. Wilson illuminates not only Lynch's fi lm but also the study of religion and fi lm by showing that the most profound cinematic experiences of religion have very little to do with traditional belief systems. His book offers fresh ways of connecting the cinematic image to the sacred experience.



Anyone who has sat through the dark and grainy world of Eraserhead knows that David Lynch's fi lms pull us into a strange world where reality turns upside down and sideways. His fi lms are carnivals that allow us to transcend our ordinary lives and to reverse the meanings we live with in our daily lives. Nowhere is this demonstrated better than in the opening scene of Blue Velvet when our worlds are literally turned on their ears.

Lynch endlessly vacillates between Hollywood conventions and avant-garde experimentation, placing viewers in the awkward position of not knowing when the image is serious and when it's in jest, when meaning is lucid or when it's lost. His vexed style in this way places form and content in a perpetually self-consuming dialogue. But what do Lynch's fi lms have to do with religion? Wilson aims to answer that question in his new book, The Strange World of David Lynch.

To say that irony (especially of the kind found in Lynch's fi lms) generates religious experience is to suggest religious can be founded on nihilism. Moreover, in claiming Lynch's fi lms are religious, one must assume that extremely violent and lurid sexual films are somehow expressions of energies of peace, tranquility, and love. Wilson illuminates not only Lynch's fi lm but also the study of religion and fi lm by showing that the most profound cinematic experiences of religion have very little to do with traditional belief systems. His book offers fresh ways of connecting the cinematic image to the sacred experience.

192 pages, Paperback

First published May 31, 2007

1 person is currently reading
76 people want to read

About the author

Eric G. Wilson

24 books23 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (11%)
4 stars
11 (32%)
3 stars
11 (32%)
2 stars
7 (20%)
1 star
1 (2%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Nathanael Booth.
108 reviews12 followers
September 14, 2010
Alternately illuminating and maddening. Wilson tries too hard to prove his point that Lynch is essentially a Gnostic filmmaker, which leads to him badly misreading Eraserhead and giving Wild at Heart far more credit than it deserves. Truth is, I spent most of my reading-time pushing back against Wilson’s idea of Gnosticism, which seems basically a-historical and fuzzy—he calls it an “existentialist interpretation” of Gnosticism, but he doesn’t seem to engage critically with Gnosticism at all. He seems to be of the “if it’s Gnostic, it’s peachy” camp. All the same, his comments can be helpful, and he does engage with a pretty broad range of Lynch-related literature. His chapter on Mulholland Drive is especially good. His concept of Transcendental Irony sounds a lot like the “commedic” view, the juxtaposition of extreme seriousness and extreme hilarity—which was in many ways a precursor to camp. In all, an interesting read, but not as helpful as I would have liked.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.