What do you think?
Rate this book


248 pages, Paperback
First published October 16, 2015
Kathy's [Acker] unwashed Gaultier dress sits on my dresser, exuding flakes of energy. I keep trying to figure out a way to talk about it. I compare the dress to a doll, I sexualize it, I have sex and think about it. I write: Kathy's Gaultier dress sits on my dress, me on my bed writing and grunting. It's as if the dress has consciousness, is waiting for something, as I come I hear something coming from the dresser, something faint, a rustle, a breath. I write: Kathy's dress sits atop my dresser, a dress that would fit a really small woman or a really big doll, we all want to turn the dead into dolls who do our bidding. I write: Kathy's dress sits atop my dresser and I want to turn this dress into a doll, it would resonate with voodoo, would resonate with Kathy's stolen doll fucking passage, but the dress refuses to budget in that direction - the dress has presence, an aura, it sits there haughty as a popular girl who refuses to talk to me - stubbornly inanimate. Then I find my notes from Alicia Cohen's talk on orphic poetry at Small Press Traffic. My journal is dated March 24, in green ink. Beneath that is written: Levinas - the philosopher never attempts to reveal/penetrate/grasp otherness. Then more fragments about how orphic poetry implies an openness to listening, to what speaks through you. The point is to greet rather than capture and contain the self. I write in the margin in black: This sounds so Kathy. At this point everything's starting to sound like Kathy. How stupid of me to try to push Kathy's dress into some clever "meaning" rather than allowing it to speak on its own terms. To enter the dream beneath the seeming concreteness of reality, one must be vigilant. It's like watching digital TV and waiting for those places where the image suddenly pixilates, disrupting the predictable narrative flow. You never know when it will happen.This bit about re-writing the details of Kathy's dress reminds me of something I just quoted earlier in a review of Megan Stielstra's The Wrong Way to Save Your Life: Essays, as suggested by Frank Kafka - about writing, re-writing, and re-writing numerous times until you get to the very heart of the matter. One of those things we think we know but whenever it comes up in exactly those words, it's eye-opening all over again.
(p142-3, "Digging Through Kathy Acker's Stuff")