"Anomalies can be difficult to unravel; however, a few observations are merited. As a general and logical matter, younger people's dearth of life experiences and their quixotic idealism make them especially vulnerable to simplistic appeals and emotional manipulation for utopia's grandiosity and social causes, which are proclaimed achievable only through top-down governmental designs and social engineering and, concurrently, the detachment from and deconstruction of societal traditions, customs, and values, for which they have little or modest conception and investment. Consequently, while in the main and abstractly the rising generation may be distrustful of authority and people, younger people are also especially susceptible to seduction by demagogic politicians, propagandizing academics, charismatic cultural idols, and other authority and popular figures propounding splendid notions of aggressive government activism for and through such corresponding militant causes as "social justice," "environmental justice," "income equality," and other corollaries of radical egalitarianism."
"On February 25, 2015, Boston University professor of economics Dr. Laurence J. Kotlikoff testified before the Senate Budget Committee about "America's fiscal insolvency and its generational consequences," He flatly stated that "Our country is broke. It's not broke in 75 years or 50 years or 25 years or 10 years. It's broke today. Indeed, it may well be in worse fiscal shape than any developed country, including Greece."
"When confronted with this debt debacle, the statists' usual and deceitful bromide is a demagoggic appeal to income redistribution- that is, to demand higher taxes on "the rich" or a "more progressive" income tax where "everyone pays their fair share. The fact is that if the federal government confiscated every penny produced by the private economy for the next decade, assuming a yearly average GDP of $20 trillion (today, it is $17.4 trillion annually), in the eleventh year the aggregate national debt would still amount to trillions of dollars. In addition, the federal government's own statistics, as analyzed by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, belie the class warfare, redistributionist agitprop. In the 2014 tax year, the top 20 percent of earners paid 84 percent of individual federal income taxes. Indeed, the top 1 percent of earners paid nearly half of the federal income tax. The bottom 40 percent of earners paid no federal income taxes. Even more, they receive federal government subsidies, including the Earned Income Tax Credit, amounting to tens of billions of dollars."
"George Washington urged his fellow citizens to "avoid...the accumulation of debt not only by shunning occasions of expense but by vigorous exertions to discharge the debts, not throwing upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear."
"Imagine the disorder and dislocation, including cost increases, supply shortages, and instability, if the federal government were in charge of supervising the production and delivery of a load of bread. It has been tried by many totalitarian regimes with terrible consequences. Yet the health-care system, which the federal government increasingly monopolizes, is far more complicated and intricate than the numerous processes involved in putting bread on the family table."
"Over forty-years ago, philosopher and author Ayn Rand, in her book Return of the Primitive--The Anti-Industrial Revolution, wrote presciently that the statists had changed their line of attack. "Instead of their old promises that collectivism would create universal abundance and their denunciations of capitalism for creating poverty, they are now denouncing capitalism for creating abundance. Instead of promising comfort and security for everyone, they are now denouncing people for being comfortable and secure.' She continued: 'The demand to 'restrict' technology is the demand to restrict man's mind. It is nature- reality- that makes both these goals impossible to achieve. Technology can be destroyed and the mind can be paralyzed, but neither can be restricted. Whether and wherever such restrictions are attempted, it is the mind-not the state-that withers away.' To restrict technology would require omniscience- a total knowledge of all the possible effects and consequences of a given development for all the potential innovators of the future."