Why I read it: This week, I've been looking for things to listen to during my long work hours, and these are full cast radio plays of Poirot's best-known cases. I love full cast plays.
Thoughts: I really wish someone would do full cast readings of the full novels, because these abridged adaptations were really fun, really good. The only two downsides are (1) that they're the biggest stories, the ones with, I think, the most adaptations; and (2) that they're not placed in chronological order (I think if they were chronological, The Mysterious Affair at Styles would've been first in the running order). Anyway, here are some short reviews on the stories themselves:
The ABC Murders: I have never liked this one, I don't know why. It feels overwrought, somehow, and I've never actually seen/heard an adaptation I actually liked, and this was no exception.
After the Funeral: the twist/denouement of this one was kind of meh. In Romanian, I would say "e cusut cu ață albă" -- it's weak, unconvincing, doesn't ring true. I really enjoyed the characters, though, so I wouldn't mind reading the full length story and seeing if the twist fits better within it.
Death on the Nile: the Peter Ustinov 1978 film adaptation of this is one of my all-time favourite movies. The star cast, the drama and tension... perfect. This radio play adaptation... is okay. It's fun! It's unexpectedly fun, considering how many moving parts there are to the story. Definitely going to listen to the full length novel for this one (weirdly enough, I don't think I've ever read it before).
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd: I was jotting down one-sentence reviews as I was finishing each of the stories, and the note on this one says "it's okay, but I don't really care - wait, did Poirot really advise suicide to the murderer?", which I thought was a weirdly cavalier attitude towards guilt and justice. And the second one in a row to do that, too -- Death on the Nile ends with a murder-suicide and Poirot's reaction is basically "that was the best ending", which made me laugh. I did like, however, that the narrator was thoroughly unreliable.
Murder on the Orient Express: a classic for a reason, I guess. Too many characters, however, and I'm not sure I really felt the full impact of the story here, the way I felt it when I actually read it for the first time.
The Mysterious Affair at Styles: I think this is the one where I began to realise how soft-hearted Poirot really is, and how much he loves to advise people (especially young people) in matters of romance. Otherwise, a rather forgettable mystery.
Peril at End House: actually really interesting! Poirot being taken in by a young woman, concerning himself with her welfare, only to discover that she took advantage of his soft heart! That was a great twist. Also another one that ends with Poirot going "if she knows what's good for her, she'll off herself".
Three Act Tragedy: another sort of forgettable one, I think, and the twist was maybe too similar to The ABC Murders? I also didn't really feel fully "with" the characters at any point because they were all kind of unsympathetic, so it was a bit of a bummer ending to the collection.
Would I read a sequel or the author's other works: I'm already listening to the second collection, aptly titled More of Poirot's Finest Cases. As far as reading more Christie goes... hell yeah, I would read more Christie. I actually think the first book I ever re-read was And Then There Were None.
Would I recommend this: Absolutely, as long as you don't mind that they're basically just the big ones, and that they're pretty heavily abridged in some cases.