Got this as a Christmas gift because it had a catchy, funny title, and I'm a lawyer. Since I'm making my way through Genesis, I figured it fit to read a book about Abraham.
The first half of the book discusses the biblical story of Abraham. Dershowitz focuses on the text of Genesis as well as the tradition of Jewish "Midrash," which are ancient commentaries on the text that seem to add significant extra-textual storytelling. For example, Dershowitz relies heavily on a Midrash regarding Abraham's upbringing, where Abraham is supposed to have worked for his father in a shop that sold idols. Abraham smashes all of the idols while his father is away, and then tells his father that the largest idol caused the destruction. His father says that the idol could not have done such a thing, at which point Abraham turns the table and points out the foolishness of worshipping powerless idols. This Midrash is taken to explain why God chose Abraham. I was unfamiliar with this tradition, so I am not sure how Midrash are typically used in the Jewish faith, but a Catholic analog might be the belief in the Assumption of Mary, which is nowhere directly discussed in the text of the New Testament.
Looking at the text and Midrash, Dershowitz draws out a few main "sides" of Abraham: idol-smasher, defender of the innocent (when he negotiates with God over the destruction of Sodom), rescuer of brethren (when he rescues Lot), shrewd negotiator (when he buys land for Sarah's burial), and someone who is foolishly complicit with immorality (when he follows God's command in the binding of Isaac). I don't know any Jewish theology, so can't evaluate whether Dershowitz's views align with that tradition—although my guess is not, as he confesses his agnosticism—but from a Christian perspective, the extended discussion of the Akedah is fairly heretical. Dershowitz repeatedly accuses God of evil and maligns Abraham for failing to stand up to him, as he had regarding the destruction of Sodom. I became so frustrated here that I put the book down and revisited one of my absolute favorites on the topic, Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling.
The second half of the book is almost a complete non-sequitur, where Dershowitz spends 1-3 pages profiling various Jewish persons throughout history. He attempts to tie each of these persons in some way through a ridiculously strained connection to Abraham. For example, he recites a few Jewish lawyers who have championed human rights issues, including (oh so modestly) himself, and compares this to Abraham defending the innocents in Sodom. He discusses a few Jews who were complicit in the rise of Naziism or Stalinist Russia and compares them to Abraham the binder of Isaac. Etc. etc. etc. The entire section feels cursory and tacked on, with only the thinnest thread justifying its inclusion in a book supposedly about Abraham.
As a final complaint, the book is written like a law review article with copious, substantive notes. I'm used to that kind of writing, so don't mind the practice, but infuriatingly all of the notes are *end notes.* With 5-10 notes per page, some merely citations, others paragraphs-long side discussions, flipping back and forth between the main text and the end of the book was extremely tedious. But at least my effort was rewarded with a 3-page endnote rant complaining about people lauding St. Thomas More's courage, thus confirming my low opinion of Dershowitz's moral instincts.