My first outstanding read of 2018. Prepare your buckles for some serious swashing (or your swashes for some buckling?) with this book. The author, Fitzroy Maclean, was a British diplomat, member of parliament and soldier, and was widely speculated to have been one of the primary models for Ian Fleming's James Bond. Eastern Approaches is the memoir of his early professional life, of first being posted as a member of the British foreign service to Moscow in the late 1930's, and subsequently of leaving the diplomatic service and serving in the Royal Army during World War II.
His Moscow posting gives Maclean the opportunity to indulge his interest in travel and exploration, as he dodges Russian secret police to travel through Soviet Central Asia, Afghanistan and Iran. He describes the people, places and history of the areas he travels through, interspersed with a steady series of amusing anecdotes about the vicissitudes of travel in interwar Russia. Maclean has a wonderful facility for description of people and places, and he humanizes his stories with characters you would recognize from your everyday life - the harried bureaucrat, the jolly chef, the dumbfounded security guard. It all has the feel of an It Happened One Night screwball comedy.
But wry, amusing travelogues aren't the only high point of the book. Midway through the Moscow portion of Eastern Approaches Maclean shifts into telling the story of the Great Soviet Purge of 1936 to 38, for which he had a ringside seat. The Purge was Stalin's effort to consolidate power by trying and executing several of the most senior Soviet leaders in a proceeding that had the whole world watching and gossiping. Maclean, who attended the trials as a British diplomat, recounts several scenes, including the testimony of key witnesses and the defendants, with a clarity and gift for reportage that kept my interest and fascination even eighty years later. And he fits the trials themselves neatly into a broader contextual understanding of the political climate of the USSR. When I finished reading that eighty-or-so-page section, I felt like I had a much deeper understanding of what it was like to be in Moscow during that time.
And all of that is just the opening act! The second part of Maclean's book takes place in North Africa during the early days of World War II. Upon the outbreak of hostilities, Maclean left the diplomatic service, and joined the army. By hook and by crook he managed to get himself attached to a special forces command stationed in Alexandria, Egypt, and spent the next couple of years conducting desert raids on the Italian Fascists in Libya and Western Egypt. He was then given command of the UK's mission to the Partisans, a communist insurgency fighting against the Italian/German occupation of Yugoslavia (remember, by mid-1941 the Germans were invading the Soviet Union and Stalin was one of the Big Three of the Allied Powers).
The last 40 percent of the book concerns Maclean's adventures with the Partisans, where he served as the UK's official liaison officer to Tito, the head of the Partisans and, after the end of the war, the leader of communist Yugoslavia for almost 40 years. Maclean recounts the hardships of living for months in enemy-held territory, of orchestrating raids and attacks on German troops, supply lines, etc., of directing the delivery of badly needed Allied supplies to the Partisan units.
Even more interesting to me than the military exploits was his recounting of the political maneuvering that took place behind all this military action, between Tito's Partisans and the competing rebel movements, between these movements and the hereditary monarchy in exile in London, and between all these parties and the Allied powers. As PM Churchill's personal representative to the Partisans, Maclean had relatively unfettered access to the highest levels of decision making in the UK government, and recounts several anecdotes of his interactions with the prime minister. It probably didn't hurt that Churchill's son was an officer attached to Maclean's mission.
Maclean's fine eye for person, place and anecdote continues to show in this last section as well. He was clearly smitten with the Balkans, and talks glowingly of the people, the food, and the geography. He expertly balances the themes of travelogue, personal memoir, political analysis and adventure tale.
OK, pretty glowing review so far. Here are the things I didn't like:
1. As fine as Maclean's writing is, he makes little effort to dig below the level of caricature when describing other people. It's actually fascinating that the people whose characters get by far the deepest treatment are a few senior Soviet officials under trial in the Great Purge, and General Tito. Maclean obviously sees his life, and history more broadly, as the story of Great Men (and yes, virtually all the people in Maclean's book are men). Apart from these few, Maclean makes little effort to write his associates as anything but side characters in The Adventures of Fitzroy Maclean. Granted, given that he's already spreading his narrative over so many kinds of writing, maybe it's too much to ask that he spend time writing deep portraits of those who shared the experiences he writes about. But it still feels a little hollow.
2. War sounds pretty damn fun in this book, which is always something I have mixed feelings about. Maclean doesn't shy away from talking about death as it occurs during his adventures, but it always feels a little removed from the actual experience of it. One very telling (to me, anyway) sign is this: Maclean never notes at any point that he has taken direct action in combat. He never alludes to himself aiming a weapon and pulling a trigger. 90 percent of the images of danger are amusing, not terrifying, as when the Bosnian guards who see Maclean's approaching boat repeatedly misinterpret their signals and spray them with machine-gun fire, without effect. His dry, reserved British humor at events like this is fun, but it's also deceiving. If someone shot my boat up with a machine gun I'd almost certainly crap my pants.
3. Maclean's life is a garden party at the Ambassador's residence to which white, aristocratic men are almost exclusively invited. Women, when they appear at all, are noted for either the novelty of women doing, you know, actual things other than cooking and making children - that jeep driver was a WAC sergeant! the Partisan sentry holding a rifle slung over her pretty shoulder was a woman! - or they make it into the narrative due to their beguiling looks, charming banter or curvy build. I mean, this guy was the prototype for James Bond, so you pretty much know what you're getting ahead of time, but still... Additionally, the racism implicit in the book is pretty tough, though I think well within the center of white Western views at the time it was written - it's not so much that he writes bad things about non-Caucasian people, but that he references them the same way that one might expect to see a bird or a piece of livestock described. If the Europeans who people Maclean's stories are caricatures, the non-Europeans are stick-figures. Not to say that it's totally unproblematic in this respect either, but I think T.E. Lawrence's Seven Pillars of Wisdom presents a clear contrast, in the way he is careful to illustrate the deep common humanity of the Arabs (though not the Turks!) who form a part of his adventure tales. The same cannot be said of Eastern Approaches.
OK in spite of those problems, I still had a great time reading this book and would highly recommend it to anyone who loves tales of adventure and political history.