3.0 out of 5 - Fair Gothic Re-Imagining of Romeo & Jules.
This was an interesting, dark read that took Romeo & Juliet to a gothic late-1800s urban setting; and it was fun to see how J.I. Radke built the parallels and watch how it played out, while getting involved in the tension and romance along the way.
Radke's indeed built an imaginative, gritty alt universe, if somewhat limited in setting. The action was confined to just a few neighborhoods and houses in a much different Victorian New London. But what puzzled me was how this was labeled steampunk. It was not. It was AU/gothic/urban fantasy set in Victorian times, but that didn't make it SP. There was no paranormal that made it gaslamp; and there was no super-science, steam or other mechanizations/inventions that made it steampunk.
Sometimes I get into where the title came from. In this case, it also revealed the themes and clues. When Levi (the Romeo) graduated from his family's militia training, he got a gun with ROOK on the handle, and he was also called the ROMANTIC. Those indeed were themes that paralleled the play. And the MCs' names were also telling. Cain, while he was an only son, had his own vengeance to carry out. And Levi, also known in the the Bible as the apostle Matthew, had his own alt "name" when he went undercover.
Like in R&J, there were two feuding households, but the younger Cain was already the head of one, and the older Levi was the heir of the other, meeting Cain at his masquerade ball, and both fell for each other. But this was darker and more violent than R&J. The households operated more like the mafia, getting into crime, drugs and gangs harassing the other family. And in this case, one family (Levi's) was doing all the harassing, making the other more the victims.
So that's where I started having issues. I had no sympathy for Levi's mafia wanna-bes. I don't like to read about the mafia, and I didn't like this family. But I guess the senseless violence built on that in R&J; though here, much more violent. I also thought the MCs were quite immature for their age. It was understandable from such teenagers as Shakespeare's Romeo (16) and Juliet (13). But not from streetwise 25 and 20 yo's. So that led to some childish thinking and behaviors and unrealistic scenarios that ultimately led to the outcome I suspected. But even then, at the end, I really didn't feel the motivation that would take me where the MCs went.
Still, it had its moments of action, romance and self-discovery, that any gay can relate to, like when Levi realized:
"Living for himself was all he wanted and had ever wanted! Through this character he’d played for Cain, he had stumbled upon warped self-discovery in the pit of cold, heartless violence that had become his life but with Cain, he’d actually just been himself."