I wanted to really like this book, and while I did enjoy reading it, it just missed so much.
First impressions was that it could have benefited from better editing, not in a grammatical sense but in where to put different elements of the story. Like many similar type books it goes back and forth between current event storytelling and informative statistics and history. The problem I had was that these transitions were not always smooth - we're talking about cooking right now, now we're talking about the history of this, now a flashback from that year in Nicaragua, now back to the present. The transitions jarred me and it always took several paragraphs to reorient myself, something that has not been a problem when reading these types of books in the past.
The order in which the chapters are in is also something that seems strange. I understand it was how it actually unfolded chronologically, but I think creative license could have been used to put it in a more coherent order. At least, I found it odd to consider the process of "stuff" or refrigeration before looking into the process of dairy or meat.
Overall, this book also wasn't what I thought it would be. It focused, as the book went on, less about the unprocessed and more on food systems and history. These things would be fine to include, but I just found it very strange that so much attention was spent on dairies and the ethics of buying milk from large scale operations, and how that is "processed," yet never once did the author talk about how cheese is made outside of the fact that pre-shredded cheese has additives to prevent caking. Cheese is made much differently industrially now than historically, and most would probably not pass the unprocessed test if it had been looked into with any depth, but perhaps this oversight was an excuse to be able to keep eating the cheese. That certainly seemed to be what happened when wine was looked into - I assumed it was unprocessed for six months, then I found out maybe not, but I'm a broke grad student that can't afford the local stuff that isn't, so screw it, I'll still drink it anyway. The author goes in turn from being overzealous in some things (eschewing store wheat for grinding local heritage wheat berries in her kitchen) to nonchalance on the others (drinking cheap processed wine instead of drinking the unprocessed wine less often).
I think these cop outs, which happened with several foods, were a reflection of the author's privileged life, and how she's willing to sacrifice only so much in the name of this project. She starts to possibly get it at the end, though her stubborn purchase of coffee during the SNAP challenge right after she sees someone not be able to buy a loaf of bread shows maybe she doesn't quite get it enough.
The information in the book was good though, especially if you are new to the subject matter. (This may be part of what I didn't like, since a lot of it is information I have read before and I wasn't expecting the rehashing on CAFOs when reading a memoir on eating unprocessed.) I did appreciate the little tips on how to unprocess yourself at the end of each chapter, many of which would be useful for those trying to make these changes. I also appreciated the author's honesty with how her year went, even if it included divulging really stupid moments on her part. While I was shocked that she thought 110 degree water would be water barely cooled from a 212 degree boiling, I have to give her kudos for including that and other failures, allowing the embarrassing moments in to show the struggles of the year.
It wasn't a bad book, and I probably would have given it a 3 if I hadn't read other books that had done this type of format so much better before. I really wish a harder editor would have helped shaped it more, because the writing itself is good and the content has potential, it just missed a bit on the delivery for me.