Fatal Judgment by Irene Hannon
Genre: Drama, mystery, suspense
Format: Kindle
Published: 2011
Timeframe: Present Day
Location: St. Loius, MO
Main Characters:
Liz Michaels: Main Character, judge whose sister was just killed
Jake Taylor: US Marshal protecting Liz
Cole Taylor: Jake’s brother, St. Louis PD detective
Alison: Jake’s sister
I was a bit leery of getting into a suspense book right after the easy, sweet western romance I just finished. I have to say, Fatal Judgment went quick and was pretty good. But I have to look at it as a secular book, because if I read it as a Christian book, I’d be disappointed… explanation at the end.
It was indeed suspenseful in a number of parts. Couldn’t put it down. And the author did a great job with characters and research in a number of areas, and it was well written! (I had to smile at all the references to Blackberries, but it was written in 2010 and published January 2011. Funny how seven years makes such a difference.)
As for the plot… It begins with Federal Judge Liz Michaels in the hospital praying her sister will survive the gunshot wound to the back of her head. US Marshal Jake Taylor has just been assigned protection duty for the judge. He knows her, and doesn’t like her, so this was going to be an unpleasant assignment.
Taking her to a safe house for a while and spending time with her, along with other law enforcement personnel, Jake gets to know the real Liz Michaels, not the uncaring wife of his best friend he believed her to be.
But a killer must be found. They believe it’s the husband because he was abusive to Liz’s sister and she was in the process of leaving him. But we learn there’s a lot more behind the shooting, and boy does the suspense notch up.
I can’t decide if the author is against the second amendment so I’m vacillating on how I will rate this. One of the characters is a wacko member an anti-government group, going off the deep end and becoming violent. It either paints the use of guns in a bad light, or the use of guns in the hands of wackos in a bad light. I’m not a fan of guns, but I do believe a person has the right to bear arms to protect themselves, so I believe in the second amendment. I’m not a fan of wackos using guns, so that’s my dilemma. Is the author making a point, or is it just a way to have a suspenseful plot using the fringe element from a group that only wants to make an issue relevant, and really means no harm?
Within the book there is an attraction between two people. One is a dedicated Christian who, despite the awful death of her husband, is still trusting God and believes He works all things together to those who love Him. The other also had a tragic death of a spouse and decided he was unhappy with God, questioning His sovereign will. Becoming friends with such a person and having a mission to help him back into a right relationship with God is acceptable. But falling in love with him without regard to his position in Christ is not. So, this is another reason I’m having a hard time with a rating.
Now, if I was to forget the fact that this is labeled as Christian Fiction, and just saw it as a secular book, it would be pretty good. Very well done, and one I stayed up until 1am reading. I’m just disappointed when authors veer away from God’s perfect will for Christians.
Ah well, I’m going to go with 4-stars because of how entertaining it was, despite my personal preference of what should be said in a Christian book. (Normally I’m not as gracious.)