The cover and title, which both suggest a fluffy chick-lit book, didn't attract me to this (I'm really annoyed that I now have to have those hated pastel colours messing up my 2011 Reading Challenge page); but I'd gathered from several sources that it was actually a gripping thriller, and from all I'd heard and read about it, I was intrigued enough to pick it up when I spotted it in the library. The Ice Cream Girls - the title referring to a nickname bestowed upon the main characters by the tabloid press - tells the story of Serena and Poppy, two girls involved in the torture and murder of a teacher who had manipulated, seduced and abused them as young teenagers. In the present day, Poppy, who was convicted, has just been released from prison, while Serena, who walked free, has built a happy life with her husband Evan and two children. The twist is that Poppy is convinced of her own innocence and determined to see justice done, while Serena appears to be dogged by guilt and is constantly paranoid that the evils of her past will catch up with her. In flashbacks, we slowly discover what really happened between Serena, Poppy and the teacher - the detestable Marcus, who maintained an abusive relationship with both girls - to lead to the murder in 1988. Meanwhile, back in the present day, Poppy searches for Serena and vows to confront her about the crime.
The book is a page-turner, but the writing isn't good; there are lots of sentences that just sound clumsy, or appear to have words or punctuation missing. The mystery/thriller element is compelling, but the book often gets much too bogged down in the interactions between various family members rather than focusing on the main subject, which can be frustrating. However, Koomson has done a wonderful (if that word's appropriate) job of replicating both the behaviour of an abuser and the mindset of the victim. The author has obviously done some serious, committed research on the subject, because in parts it's one of the most realistic depictions of an abusive relationship I've ever encountered. The fact that the girls realise their involvement with Marcus is destructive and are aware that he is the one in the wrong, but still continue tolerating his abuse and feel trapped by their feelings and the isolation he has imposed on them, is particularly striking.
What I didn't find so realistic was the fact that Marcus was able to carry on physically abusing the girls so severely while they were still living at home with their families. We learn that Marcus beats Serena and Poppy so badly that he regularly has to take them to hospital - wouldn't their parents have been informed, since they were 15 at the time? Wouldn't their families (who are portrayed as caring and protective) have noticed the injuries, the constant pain; wouldn't they at least have noticed the girls were away from home so often? And, given the extent of the abuse, wouldn't there have been plenty of physical evidence against Marcus when it came to the trial? As well as eyewitnesses who would have seen him taking them into the hospitals, doctors and nurses who might have wondered why these middle-class teenage girls were covered in bruises and cuts... and if Marlene was seeking a restraining order against him, would this not have been at least brought up in court, even if she refused to testify? It's not the extent of the abuse I find unrealistic, nor the fact that neither Serena nor Poppy walks away - sadly, these details are all too believable - but the idea that everyone would automatically believe two underage girls had 'seduced' and killed a man who was rarely allowed to see his own son, apparently without even asking why they had so many mysterious broken bones and scars. Even if the girls held back on telling the whole truth out of residual love for Marcus, their parents and defence lawyers would surely have been able to piece together a damning case against him without very much difficulty at all. Poppy even mentions that during her prison sentence she received letters from six other girls who had been abused by Marcus. Why wouldn't these girls have come forward, or been sought out by the police/the girls' solicitors? What about all the sexy underwear and clothes he was constantly buying them - he must have been into shops to get them, had receipts - wouldn't that have cast a bit of a different light on the 'they seduced him' story? I could go on.
I'm not a great lover of this genre - the chick/family-lit meets crime thriller sort of thing - and I always seem to end up giving them 3 stars at the most, yet I keep reading them anyway. What can I say? Maybe this is the true definition of a 'guilty pleasure'. I really don't think the plot of this book is up to much at all (there were numerous other plot holes as well as what I've outlined above), but I think it deserves recognition for the author's obvious commitment to her subject matter and the fact that, through writing this book, she is clearly trying to help raise awareness of abusive relationships and domestic violence. Koomson impresses on her readers the importance of 'spotting the signs' through both the narrative itself (towards the end, present-day Serena reaches out to help a neighbour she suspects is a victim) and an author's note at the end. I find this very commendable, particularly in a book aimed at the chick-lit market - even if I didn't love the book itself.